Irrigation scheduling strategies for pepper based on evaporation and reference evapotranspiration

B. Pejić, I. Bajić, K. Mačkić, D. Bugarski, S. Vlajić, A. Takač, M. Aksić
{"title":"Irrigation scheduling strategies for pepper based on evaporation and reference evapotranspiration","authors":"B. Pejić, I. Bajić, K. Mačkić, D. Bugarski, S. Vlajić, A. Takač, M. Aksić","doi":"10.5937/aaser2151069p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experiment with drip irrigated pepper was conducted at the Rimski Šančevi experimental field of the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad in 2019. The irrigation was scheduled on the basis of the water balance method. Two methods were used to compute the daily evapotranspiration of pepper (ETd): reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and evaporation from an open water surface (Eo). Crop coefficients (kc) and corrective coefficients (k) were used to convert ETo and Eo values into ETd. Kc and k were 0.3-0.4, 0.6-0.7, 0.9-1.1, 0.8-0.9 and 0.4, 0.7, 1.0 and 0.8 for initial stage, crop development, mid season, and late season, respectively. ETo was calculated by the Hargreaves equation. Eo values were measured by a Class-A pan located at a meteorological station near the experimental plot. Irrigation started when readily available water (RAW) in the 0.3 m soil layer was completely absorbed by plants. Differences in crop yield (Y) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) obtained using Eo (42.58 t ha-1, 15.20 kg m-3) and ETo (40.78 t ha-1, 14.56 kg m-3) were not statistically different. Evapotranspiration rate was 364.2 mm and 337.3 mm in Eo and ETo variant, respectively. The fact that the differences in Y and IWUE between different calculations of ETd were not statistically significant indicates that both methods can be recommended for irrigation scheduling programs for pepper in the climatic conditions of the Vojvodina region. However, priority should be given to ETo due to the easy accessibility and reliability of data.","PeriodicalId":31632,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agriculturae Serbica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agriculturae Serbica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/aaser2151069p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The experiment with drip irrigated pepper was conducted at the Rimski Šančevi experimental field of the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad in 2019. The irrigation was scheduled on the basis of the water balance method. Two methods were used to compute the daily evapotranspiration of pepper (ETd): reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and evaporation from an open water surface (Eo). Crop coefficients (kc) and corrective coefficients (k) were used to convert ETo and Eo values into ETd. Kc and k were 0.3-0.4, 0.6-0.7, 0.9-1.1, 0.8-0.9 and 0.4, 0.7, 1.0 and 0.8 for initial stage, crop development, mid season, and late season, respectively. ETo was calculated by the Hargreaves equation. Eo values were measured by a Class-A pan located at a meteorological station near the experimental plot. Irrigation started when readily available water (RAW) in the 0.3 m soil layer was completely absorbed by plants. Differences in crop yield (Y) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) obtained using Eo (42.58 t ha-1, 15.20 kg m-3) and ETo (40.78 t ha-1, 14.56 kg m-3) were not statistically different. Evapotranspiration rate was 364.2 mm and 337.3 mm in Eo and ETo variant, respectively. The fact that the differences in Y and IWUE between different calculations of ETd were not statistically significant indicates that both methods can be recommended for irrigation scheduling programs for pepper in the climatic conditions of the Vojvodina region. However, priority should be given to ETo due to the easy accessibility and reliability of data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于蒸发量和参考蒸散量的辣椒灌溉调度策略
滴灌辣椒试验于2019年在诺维萨德大田和蔬菜作物研究所的Rimski Šančevi试验田进行。根据水量平衡法进行灌溉调度。采用参考蒸散发(ETo)和开放水面蒸散发(Eo)两种方法计算辣椒的日蒸散发。利用作物系数(kc)和校正系数(k)将ETo和Eo值转换为ETd。初熟期、作物生育期、季中、晚熟期的Kc和k值分别为0.3 ~ 0.4、0.6 ~ 0.7、0.9 ~ 1.1、0.8 ~ 0.9和0.4、0.7、1.0和0.8。ETo由哈格里夫斯方程计算。Eo值由设在试验田附近气象站的a类平底锅测量。当0.3 m土层的有效水分(RAW)被植物完全吸收后,开始灌溉。Eo (42.58 t ha-1, 15.20 kg m-3)和ETo (40.78 t ha-1, 14.56 kg m-3)处理的作物产量(Y)和灌溉水分利用效率(IWUE)差异无统计学意义。Eo和ETo变异的蒸散速率分别为364.2 mm和337.3 mm。不同ETd计算方法的Y值和IWUE值差异无统计学意义,说明在伏伊伏丁那地区的气候条件下,这两种方法都可以作为辣椒灌溉调度方案的推荐方法。然而,由于数据的易访问性和可靠性,应优先考虑ETo。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of smallholder farmers' adaptation to climate extremes: Evidence from the Southern Province of Zambia Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) grown under the conditions of the life cycle of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) in order to achieve a stable seed yield Bioethanol production from potato peel waste using Saccharomyces cerevisiae Weed biological control with fungi-based bioherbicides Effect of iron application methods on grain yield and iron concentration of rice under different nitrogen levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1