Calculation of maize evapotranspiration using evaporation and reference evapotranspiration methods

B. Pejić, K. Mačkić, I. Bajić, V. Sikora, D. Simić, Milena Jančić-Tovjanin, B. Gajić
{"title":"Calculation of maize evapotranspiration using evaporation and reference evapotranspiration methods","authors":"B. Pejić, K. Mačkić, I. Bajić, V. Sikora, D. Simić, Milena Jančić-Tovjanin, B. Gajić","doi":"10.5937/zembilj2002015p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of irrigation scheduling of maize was done by using evaporation from the free water surface (Eo) and correction coefficients (k) and reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and crop coefficients (kc). The field experiment was carried out in 2018 on the Experimental field of the Institute of field and vegetable crops in the Department of alternative crops in Bački Petrovac. Maize hybrid NS 6030 was used for the trials. The plants were irrigated by a drip system with a lateral in each row with drippers spaced every 0.33 m. The drippers had an average flow rate of 2.0 l h-1 under the pressure of 70 kPa. The differences in yield of maize in the irrigation conditions were not statistically significant compared to the variant without irrigation because the year was favorable for maize production. As well there was no difference among variants used for the calculation of maize evapotranspiration. Maize evapotranspiration in the growing season (ETm) were 502 mm and 429 mm by using ETo and kc and Eo and k. Monthly values of ETm during the growing season were consistent regardless of the calculation methods, except in July. Values of ETm in July of 151 mm and 107 mm calculated by using ETo and kc and Eo and k methods as well the daily values which are correlated with the monthly have to be checked in irrigation scheduling of maize in the following investigation period. If statistical significance in maize yield between different methods of calculation is determined, the procedure with a higher yield has to be accepted in the calculation of ETm in the climatic conditions of the Vojvodina region. Otherwise, if the differences in maize yield are not statistical significance a method of calculation by using Eo and k will be recommended, because the value of the lower daily water used on maize evapotranspiration may be considered more realistic.","PeriodicalId":33795,"journal":{"name":"Zemljiste i biljka","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zemljiste i biljka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zembilj2002015p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysis of irrigation scheduling of maize was done by using evaporation from the free water surface (Eo) and correction coefficients (k) and reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and crop coefficients (kc). The field experiment was carried out in 2018 on the Experimental field of the Institute of field and vegetable crops in the Department of alternative crops in Bački Petrovac. Maize hybrid NS 6030 was used for the trials. The plants were irrigated by a drip system with a lateral in each row with drippers spaced every 0.33 m. The drippers had an average flow rate of 2.0 l h-1 under the pressure of 70 kPa. The differences in yield of maize in the irrigation conditions were not statistically significant compared to the variant without irrigation because the year was favorable for maize production. As well there was no difference among variants used for the calculation of maize evapotranspiration. Maize evapotranspiration in the growing season (ETm) were 502 mm and 429 mm by using ETo and kc and Eo and k. Monthly values of ETm during the growing season were consistent regardless of the calculation methods, except in July. Values of ETm in July of 151 mm and 107 mm calculated by using ETo and kc and Eo and k methods as well the daily values which are correlated with the monthly have to be checked in irrigation scheduling of maize in the following investigation period. If statistical significance in maize yield between different methods of calculation is determined, the procedure with a higher yield has to be accepted in the calculation of ETm in the climatic conditions of the Vojvodina region. Otherwise, if the differences in maize yield are not statistical significance a method of calculation by using Eo and k will be recommended, because the value of the lower daily water used on maize evapotranspiration may be considered more realistic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用蒸发量法和参考蒸发量法计算玉米蒸散量
利用自由水面蒸发量(Eo)和校正系数(k)、参考蒸散量(ETo)和作物系数(kc)对玉米灌溉调度进行了分析。该大田试验于2018年在ba ki Petrovac替代作物部大田和蔬菜作物研究所的试验田进行。试验选用玉米杂交种NS 6030。植物采用滴灌系统进行灌溉,每排有一个横向的滴管,每隔0.33米。在70 kPa压力下,滴管平均流量为2.0 l h-1。由于年份是玉米生产的有利年份,灌溉条件下的玉米产量与不灌溉的玉米产量差异无统计学意义。在计算玉米蒸散量时,各变异间也没有差异。玉米生长季蒸散量(ETm)分别为502 mm和429 mm。除7月外,不同计算方法的月蒸散量基本一致。利用ETo和kc、Eo和k法计算出的7月份151 mm和107 mm的ETm值,以及与月相关的日值,在后续调查期的玉米灌溉调度中需要进行核对。如果确定不同计算方法之间玉米产量的统计显著性,则在伏伊伏丁那地区气候条件下,计算ETm时必须接受产量较高的方法。否则,如果玉米产量差异不具有统计学意义,则建议使用Eo和k计算方法,因为玉米蒸腾日用水量较低的值可能更现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The history, activities and future perspectives of the Serbian Soil Science Society Fertility and potentially toxic elements content in Mačva Contribution to the knowledge of the soils formed on limestones on the Ozren Mountain Microbiological and basic agrochemical properties of Fluvisols along the Western Morava basin Crops influence on Chernozem soil structure Influence of winter cover crops and different spring crops on soil structure indicators on
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1