The Logic of Learning

William E. Murnion
{"title":"The Logic of Learning","authors":"William E. Murnion","doi":"10.5840/PRA1986/1987123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". I use the term logical and relational learning (LRL) to re-fer to the sub- eld of machine learning and data mining that is concerned with learning in expressive logical or relational representations. It is the union of inductive logic programming, (statistical) relational learning and multi-relational data mining and constitutes a general class of techniques and methodology for learning from structured data (such as graphs, networks, relational databases) and background knowledge. During the course of its existence, logical and relational learning has changed dramatically. Whereas early work was mainly concerned with logical issues (and even program synthesis from examples), in the 90s its focus was on the discovery of new and interpretable knowledge from structured data, often in the form of rules or patterns. Since then the range of tasks to which log- ical and relational learning has been applied has signicantly broadened and now covers almost all machine learning problems and settings. Today, there ex- ist logical and relational learning methods for reinforcement learning, statistical learning, distance-and kernel-based learning in addition to traditional symbolic machine learning approaches. At the same time, logical and relational learning problems are appearing everywhere. Advances in intelligent systems are enabling the generation of high-level symbolic and structured data in a wide variety of domains, including the semantic web, robotics, vision, social networks, and the life sciences, which in turn raises new challenges and opportunities for logical and relational learning. In this talk, I will start by providing a gentle introduction to the field of logical and relational learning and then continue with an overview of the logical foundations for learning, which are concerned with various settings for learning (such as learning from entailment, from interpreta-tions and from proofs), with the logical inference rules and generality relationships used, and the effects they have on the properties of the search-space. More details can be found in","PeriodicalId":82315,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy research archives (Bowling Green, Ohio : 1982)","volume":"12 1","pages":"267-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5840/PRA1986/1987123","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy research archives (Bowling Green, Ohio : 1982)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/PRA1986/1987123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

. I use the term logical and relational learning (LRL) to re-fer to the sub- eld of machine learning and data mining that is concerned with learning in expressive logical or relational representations. It is the union of inductive logic programming, (statistical) relational learning and multi-relational data mining and constitutes a general class of techniques and methodology for learning from structured data (such as graphs, networks, relational databases) and background knowledge. During the course of its existence, logical and relational learning has changed dramatically. Whereas early work was mainly concerned with logical issues (and even program synthesis from examples), in the 90s its focus was on the discovery of new and interpretable knowledge from structured data, often in the form of rules or patterns. Since then the range of tasks to which log- ical and relational learning has been applied has signicantly broadened and now covers almost all machine learning problems and settings. Today, there ex- ist logical and relational learning methods for reinforcement learning, statistical learning, distance-and kernel-based learning in addition to traditional symbolic machine learning approaches. At the same time, logical and relational learning problems are appearing everywhere. Advances in intelligent systems are enabling the generation of high-level symbolic and structured data in a wide variety of domains, including the semantic web, robotics, vision, social networks, and the life sciences, which in turn raises new challenges and opportunities for logical and relational learning. In this talk, I will start by providing a gentle introduction to the field of logical and relational learning and then continue with an overview of the logical foundations for learning, which are concerned with various settings for learning (such as learning from entailment, from interpreta-tions and from proofs), with the logical inference rules and generality relationships used, and the effects they have on the properties of the search-space. More details can be found in
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习的逻辑
。我使用术语“逻辑和关系学习”(LRL)来指代机器学习和数据挖掘的子领域,它与表达逻辑或关系表示的学习有关。它是归纳逻辑编程、(统计)关系学习和多关系数据挖掘的结合,构成了从结构化数据(如图、网络、关系数据库)和背景知识中学习的一般技术和方法。在其存在的过程中,逻辑和关系学习发生了巨大的变化。早期的工作主要关注逻辑问题(甚至从例子中合成程序),而在90年代,它的重点是从结构化数据中发现新的和可解释的知识,通常以规则或模式的形式出现。从那时起,应用逻辑和关系学习的任务范围已经大大扩大,现在几乎涵盖了所有机器学习问题和设置。今天,除了传统的符号机器学习方法外,还有用于强化学习、统计学习、基于距离和核的学习的逻辑和关系学习方法。与此同时,逻辑和关系学习问题无处不在。智能系统的进步使得在各种领域生成高级符号和结构化数据成为可能,包括语义网、机器人、视觉、社交网络和生命科学,这反过来又为逻辑和关系学习提出了新的挑战和机遇。在这次演讲中,我将首先对逻辑和关系学习领域进行一个温和的介绍,然后继续概述学习的逻辑基础,这些基础涉及各种学习设置(例如从蕴涵中学习,从解释中学习和从证明中学习),使用逻辑推理规则和一般关系,以及它们对搜索空间属性的影响。更多细节可在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Selective Conscientious Objection Medieval Arabic Poetics: Poetic Syllogism and Community in Avicenna’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics Reichenbach and Smart on Temporal Discourse Ockham’s Razor and the Identity of Indiscernables A Critique of Kant’s Defense of Theistic Faith
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1