Identification of Optimal Combined Moderators for Time to Relapse

Bang Wang, Yu Cheng, M. Levine
{"title":"Identification of Optimal Combined Moderators for Time to Relapse","authors":"Bang Wang, Yu Cheng, M. Levine","doi":"10.6339/23-jds1107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying treatment effect modifiers (i.e., moderators) plays an essential role in improving treatment efficacy when substantial treatment heterogeneity exists. However, studies are often underpowered for detecting treatment effect modifiers, and exploratory analyses that examine one moderator per statistical model often yield spurious interactions. Therefore, in this work, we focus on creating an intuitive and readily implementable framework to facilitate the discovery of treatment effect modifiers and to make treatment recommendations for time-to-event outcomes. To minimize the impact of a misspecified main effect and avoid complex modeling, we construct the framework by matching the treated with the controls and modeling the conditional average treatment effect via regressing the difference in the observed outcomes of a matched pair on the averaged moderators. Inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting is used to handle censored observations. As matching is the foundation of the proposed methods, we explore different matching metrics and recommend the use of Mahalanobis distance when both continuous and categorical moderators are present. After matching, the proposed framework can be flexibly combined with popular variable selection and prediction methods such as linear regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), and random forest to create different combinations of potential moderators. The optimal combination is determined by the out-of-bag prediction error and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in making correct treatment recommendations. We compare the performance of various combined moderators through extensive simulations and the analysis of real trial data. Our approach can be easily implemented using existing R packages, resulting in a straightforward optimal combined moderator to make treatment recommendations.","PeriodicalId":73699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of data science : JDS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of data science : JDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6339/23-jds1107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying treatment effect modifiers (i.e., moderators) plays an essential role in improving treatment efficacy when substantial treatment heterogeneity exists. However, studies are often underpowered for detecting treatment effect modifiers, and exploratory analyses that examine one moderator per statistical model often yield spurious interactions. Therefore, in this work, we focus on creating an intuitive and readily implementable framework to facilitate the discovery of treatment effect modifiers and to make treatment recommendations for time-to-event outcomes. To minimize the impact of a misspecified main effect and avoid complex modeling, we construct the framework by matching the treated with the controls and modeling the conditional average treatment effect via regressing the difference in the observed outcomes of a matched pair on the averaged moderators. Inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting is used to handle censored observations. As matching is the foundation of the proposed methods, we explore different matching metrics and recommend the use of Mahalanobis distance when both continuous and categorical moderators are present. After matching, the proposed framework can be flexibly combined with popular variable selection and prediction methods such as linear regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), and random forest to create different combinations of potential moderators. The optimal combination is determined by the out-of-bag prediction error and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in making correct treatment recommendations. We compare the performance of various combined moderators through extensive simulations and the analysis of real trial data. Our approach can be easily implemented using existing R packages, resulting in a straightforward optimal combined moderator to make treatment recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复吸时间最优组合调节因子的识别
当治疗异质性存在时,识别治疗效果调节剂(即调节因子)在提高治疗疗效方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,在检测治疗效果调节剂方面的研究往往力度不足,并且每个统计模型检查一个调节剂的探索性分析经常产生虚假的相互作用。因此,在这项工作中,我们专注于创建一个直观且易于实施的框架,以促进治疗效果调节剂的发现,并针对事件发生时间提出治疗建议。为了最小化指定错误的主效应的影响并避免复杂的建模,我们通过将被处理组与对照组匹配,并通过回归匹配对平均调节因子的观察结果的差异来建模条件平均处理效应,从而构建了框架。采用反截后概率加权法处理截后观测值。由于匹配是所提出方法的基础,我们探索了不同的匹配度量,并建议在存在连续调节因子和分类调节因子时使用马氏距离。匹配后,该框架可灵活结合线性回归、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(Lasso)、随机森林等常用的变量选择和预测方法,创建不同组合的潜在调节因子。最优组合是由出袋预测误差和受试者工作特性曲线下面积决定的,从而给出正确的治疗建议。我们通过广泛的模拟和对真实试验数据的分析,比较了各种组合调节剂的性能。我们的方法可以很容易地使用现有的R包实现,从而产生一个直接的最佳组合缓和剂来提出治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Shape-restricted Single-index Hazard Models. Central Posterior Envelopes for Bayesian Functional Principal Component Analysis. Optimal Physician Shared-Patient Networks and the Diffusion of Medical Technologies. Generating General Preferential Attachment Networks with R Package wdnet Identification of Optimal Combined Moderators for Time to Relapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1