Association Between Body Fat and Body Mass Index from Incomplete Longitudinal Proportion Data: Findings from the Fels Study

Xin Tong, Seohyun Kim, D. Bandyopadhyay, Shumei S. Sun
{"title":"Association Between Body Fat and Body Mass Index from Incomplete Longitudinal Proportion Data: Findings from the Fels Study","authors":"Xin Tong, Seohyun Kim, D. Bandyopadhyay, Shumei S. Sun","doi":"10.6339/23-jds1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obesity rates continue to exhibit an upward trajectory, particularly in the US, and is the underlying cause of several comorbidities, including but not limited to high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and cancers. To monitor obesity, body mass index (BMI) and proportion body fat (PBF) are two commonly used measurements. Although BMI and PBF changes over time in an individual’s lifespan and their relationship may also change dynamically, existing work has mostly remained cross-sectional, or separately modeling BMI and PBF. A combined longitudinal assessment is expected to be more effective in unravelling their complex interplay. To mitigate this, we consider Bayesian cross-domain latent growth curve models within a structural equation modeling framework, which simultaneously handles issues such as individually varying time metrics, proportion data, and potential missing not at random data for joint assessment of the longitudinal changes of BMI and PBF. Through simulation studies, we observe that our proposed models and estimation method yielded parameter estimates with small bias and mean squared error in general, however, a mis-specified missing data mechanism may cause inaccurate and inefficient parameter estimates. Furthermore, we demonstrate application of our method to a motivating longitudinal obesity study, controlling for both time-invariant (such as, sex), and time-varying (such as diastolic and systolic blood pressure, biceps skinfold, bioelectrical impedance, and waist circumference) covariates in separate models. Under time-invariance, we observe that the initial BMI level and the rate of change in BMI influenced PBF. However, in presence of time-varying covariates, only the initial BMI level influenced the initial PBF. The added-on selection model estimation indicated that observations with higher PBF values were less likely to be missing.","PeriodicalId":73699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of data science : JDS","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of data science : JDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6339/23-jds1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obesity rates continue to exhibit an upward trajectory, particularly in the US, and is the underlying cause of several comorbidities, including but not limited to high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and cancers. To monitor obesity, body mass index (BMI) and proportion body fat (PBF) are two commonly used measurements. Although BMI and PBF changes over time in an individual’s lifespan and their relationship may also change dynamically, existing work has mostly remained cross-sectional, or separately modeling BMI and PBF. A combined longitudinal assessment is expected to be more effective in unravelling their complex interplay. To mitigate this, we consider Bayesian cross-domain latent growth curve models within a structural equation modeling framework, which simultaneously handles issues such as individually varying time metrics, proportion data, and potential missing not at random data for joint assessment of the longitudinal changes of BMI and PBF. Through simulation studies, we observe that our proposed models and estimation method yielded parameter estimates with small bias and mean squared error in general, however, a mis-specified missing data mechanism may cause inaccurate and inefficient parameter estimates. Furthermore, we demonstrate application of our method to a motivating longitudinal obesity study, controlling for both time-invariant (such as, sex), and time-varying (such as diastolic and systolic blood pressure, biceps skinfold, bioelectrical impedance, and waist circumference) covariates in separate models. Under time-invariance, we observe that the initial BMI level and the rate of change in BMI influenced PBF. However, in presence of time-varying covariates, only the initial BMI level influenced the initial PBF. The added-on selection model estimation indicated that observations with higher PBF values were less likely to be missing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自不完整纵向比例数据的体脂和体重指数之间的关系:来自费尔斯研究的发现
肥胖率继续呈上升趋势,特别是在美国,并且是几种合并症的潜在原因,包括但不限于高血压、高胆固醇、糖尿病、心脏病、中风和癌症。为了监测肥胖,身体质量指数(BMI)和身体脂肪比例(PBF)是两种常用的测量方法。虽然BMI和PBF在个体的一生中会随着时间的推移而变化,它们之间的关系也可能动态变化,但现有的研究大多是横向的,或者是单独对BMI和PBF进行建模。综合的纵向评估有望更有效地揭示它们复杂的相互作用。为了缓解这一问题,我们在结构方程建模框架内考虑贝叶斯跨域潜在增长曲线模型,该模型同时处理诸如单独变化的时间指标、比例数据和潜在的非随机数据缺失等问题,以联合评估BMI和PBF的纵向变化。通过仿真研究,我们发现我们所提出的模型和估计方法得到的参数估计总体上具有较小的偏差和均方误差,然而,错误指定的缺失数据机制可能导致参数估计不准确和低效。此外,我们展示了我们的方法在纵向肥胖研究中的应用,在不同的模型中控制了时不变(如性别)和时变(如舒张压和收缩压、二头肌皮褶、生物电阻抗和腰围)协变量。在时不变条件下,我们观察到初始BMI水平和BMI变化率影响PBF。然而,当存在时变协变量时,只有初始BMI水平影响初始PBF。附加选择模型估计表明,PBF值较高的观测值不太可能丢失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Shape-restricted Single-index Hazard Models. Central Posterior Envelopes for Bayesian Functional Principal Component Analysis. Optimal Physician Shared-Patient Networks and the Diffusion of Medical Technologies. Generating General Preferential Attachment Networks with R Package wdnet Identification of Optimal Combined Moderators for Time to Relapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1