COVID-19 and Pandemic Preparedness: Foresight Narratives and Public Sector Responses

IF 0.6 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Journal of Futures Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.6531/jfs.202109_26(1).0001
I. Milojević
{"title":"COVID-19 and Pandemic Preparedness: Foresight Narratives and Public Sector Responses","authors":"I. Milojević","doi":"10.6531/jfs.202109_26(1).0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of the COVID-19 pandemic is a novel global challenge being addressed in real time. While some countries and regions of the world have had more recent experience managing similar viruses (such as SARS), all have had to deal with the new corona virus and the novel challenges that it presents. Public policy responses are rapidly changing, sometimes daily. This article focuses on how foresight narratives have impacted policymaking as related to the COVID-19 pandemic. More specifically, it provides an overview of the use of foresight within the public sector prior to the pandemic. It also investigates the key narratives in circulation during the implementation of governments' strategic objectives and the realization of visions of a 'pandemic-free' society. The approach used here is that of narrative foresight which predominantly focuses on the stories that individuals, organizations, states and civilizations tell themselves about the future. In addition to the overarching narratives, the article also investigates more specifically the most commonly used metaphors prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal of the article is to ascertain which lessons we can learn in terms of successes and failures of narrative foresight in action', so as to be able to utilise this knowledge for future global problems. Finally, the article argues that many current metaphors and narratives are linked to 'futures fallacies' - detrimental thinking patterns about the future. It then concludes by briefly investigating alternative narratives and metaphors which are more likely to facilitate the desired future of adequate pandemic preparedness.","PeriodicalId":44849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Futures Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Futures Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6531/jfs.202109_26(1).0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The management of the COVID-19 pandemic is a novel global challenge being addressed in real time. While some countries and regions of the world have had more recent experience managing similar viruses (such as SARS), all have had to deal with the new corona virus and the novel challenges that it presents. Public policy responses are rapidly changing, sometimes daily. This article focuses on how foresight narratives have impacted policymaking as related to the COVID-19 pandemic. More specifically, it provides an overview of the use of foresight within the public sector prior to the pandemic. It also investigates the key narratives in circulation during the implementation of governments' strategic objectives and the realization of visions of a 'pandemic-free' society. The approach used here is that of narrative foresight which predominantly focuses on the stories that individuals, organizations, states and civilizations tell themselves about the future. In addition to the overarching narratives, the article also investigates more specifically the most commonly used metaphors prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal of the article is to ascertain which lessons we can learn in terms of successes and failures of narrative foresight in action', so as to be able to utilise this knowledge for future global problems. Finally, the article argues that many current metaphors and narratives are linked to 'futures fallacies' - detrimental thinking patterns about the future. It then concludes by briefly investigating alternative narratives and metaphors which are more likely to facilitate the desired future of adequate pandemic preparedness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病和大流行防范:前瞻性叙述和公共部门应对
COVID-19大流行的管理是实时应对的一项新的全球挑战。虽然世界上一些国家和地区最近有了管理类似病毒(如SARS)的经验,但所有国家和地区都必须应对新的冠状病毒及其带来的新挑战。公共政策的反应正在迅速变化,有时每天都在变化。本文重点关注与COVID-19大流行相关的前瞻性叙事如何影响政策制定。更具体地说,它概述了在大流行之前公共部门使用预见的情况。报告还调查了在执行政府战略目标和实现"无大流行病"社会愿景期间流传的主要说法。这里使用的方法是叙事预见,主要关注个人、组织、国家和文明对自己讲述的关于未来的故事。除了总体叙述外,本文还更具体地调查了COVID-19大流行之前和期间最常用的隐喻。本文的目的是确定我们可以从“行动中的叙事远见”的成功和失败中吸取哪些教训,以便能够利用这些知识解决未来的全球问题。最后,文章认为,许多当前的隐喻和叙述都与“未来谬误”——关于未来的有害思维模式——有关。然后,它简要地调查了更有可能促进充分流行病防范的理想未来的替代叙述和比喻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Futures Studies
Journal of Futures Studies REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Futures Studies is a globally-oriented, trans-disciplinary referred journal. Its mission is to develop high-quality, futures-oriented research and thinking based on the evolving knowledge base of Futures Studies. Articles accepted for publication are expected to show an in-depth understanding of the field"s dimensions, content, research perspectives and methods.
期刊最新文献
Somewhere Between a Rock and an Outer Space: Regenerating Apocalyptic Education. Towards Sustainable Island Futures: Design for Ocean Wave Energy Exploring Digital Transformation in Higher Education and Research via Scenarios Data-Driven Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future: A Novel Model of Urbanism and Its Core Dimensions, Strategies, and Solutions COVID-19 and Pandemic Preparedness: Foresight Narratives and Public Sector Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1