{"title":"Towards a New Paradigm for Development: Strategies, Policies and Processes","authors":"J. Stiglitz","doi":"10.7916/D8MC98VB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an address to the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Helsinki at the beginning of this year, I argued that we needed to go beyond the Washington consensus: there were broader objectives to development than were embodied in that consensus, the set of policy recommendations upon which it focused was certainly not sufficient for development, and indeed some of the most successful developers had paid little heed to its dictums. That consensus all too often confused means with ends: it took privatization and trade liberalization as ends in themselves, rather than as means to more sustainable, equitable, and democratic growth. I talked there about many of the ways in which the Washington consensus had gone astray. It focused too much on price stability, rather than growth and the stability of output. It failed to recognize that strengthening financial institutions is every bit as important to economic stability as controlling budget deficits and increasing the money supply. It focused on privatization, but paid too little attention to the institutional infrastructure that is required to make markets work, and especially to the importance of competition. In today’s lecture, I want to go beyond these by now well-documented failures of the Washington consensus to begin providing the foundations of an alternative paradigm,","PeriodicalId":39357,"journal":{"name":"Applied Econometrics and International Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Econometrics and International Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8MC98VB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120
Abstract
In an address to the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Helsinki at the beginning of this year, I argued that we needed to go beyond the Washington consensus: there were broader objectives to development than were embodied in that consensus, the set of policy recommendations upon which it focused was certainly not sufficient for development, and indeed some of the most successful developers had paid little heed to its dictums. That consensus all too often confused means with ends: it took privatization and trade liberalization as ends in themselves, rather than as means to more sustainable, equitable, and democratic growth. I talked there about many of the ways in which the Washington consensus had gone astray. It focused too much on price stability, rather than growth and the stability of output. It failed to recognize that strengthening financial institutions is every bit as important to economic stability as controlling budget deficits and increasing the money supply. It focused on privatization, but paid too little attention to the institutional infrastructure that is required to make markets work, and especially to the importance of competition. In today’s lecture, I want to go beyond these by now well-documented failures of the Washington consensus to begin providing the foundations of an alternative paradigm,
期刊介绍:
This journal is scheduled to finish publication in year 2020, after reaching its goals.AEID is a refereed and printed journal in English, published for the period 2001-2020, included in Econ-Lit, SCOPUS, IBSS, SSRN and other selected indexes of Economics research. The emphasis is on economic development with and international and quantitative approach, and the main aim is to foster international cooperation to development.