This study investigates the causal relationship between financial development and economic growth in Sri Lanka over the period 1955 to 2005. After considering the time series characteristics of six measures of financial development, Johansen cointegration and the appropriate Error Correction Model are used to investigate the causal relationship between financial development and economic growth. The findings suggest that broad money causes economic growth with two-way causality. The major finding of this study does not strongly support the view that financial development boosts economic growth.
{"title":"Financial Development and Economic Growth in Sri Lanka","authors":"N. Perera, R. Paudel","doi":"10.15027/41408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15027/41408","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the causal relationship between financial development and economic growth in Sri Lanka over the period 1955 to 2005. After considering the time series characteristics of six measures of financial development, Johansen cointegration and the appropriate Error Correction Model are used to investigate the causal relationship between financial development and economic growth. The findings suggest that broad money causes economic growth with two-way causality. The major finding of this study does not strongly support the view that financial development boosts economic growth.","PeriodicalId":39357,"journal":{"name":"Applied Econometrics and International Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66746614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In an address to the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Helsinki at the beginning of this year, I argued that we needed to go beyond the Washington consensus: there were broader objectives to development than were embodied in that consensus, the set of policy recommendations upon which it focused was certainly not sufficient for development, and indeed some of the most successful developers had paid little heed to its dictums. That consensus all too often confused means with ends: it took privatization and trade liberalization as ends in themselves, rather than as means to more sustainable, equitable, and democratic growth. I talked there about many of the ways in which the Washington consensus had gone astray. It focused too much on price stability, rather than growth and the stability of output. It failed to recognize that strengthening financial institutions is every bit as important to economic stability as controlling budget deficits and increasing the money supply. It focused on privatization, but paid too little attention to the institutional infrastructure that is required to make markets work, and especially to the importance of competition. In today’s lecture, I want to go beyond these by now well-documented failures of the Washington consensus to begin providing the foundations of an alternative paradigm,
{"title":"Towards a New Paradigm for Development: Strategies, Policies and Processes","authors":"J. Stiglitz","doi":"10.7916/D8MC98VB","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8MC98VB","url":null,"abstract":"In an address to the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Helsinki at the beginning of this year, I argued that we needed to go beyond the Washington consensus: there were broader objectives to development than were embodied in that consensus, the set of policy recommendations upon which it focused was certainly not sufficient for development, and indeed some of the most successful developers had paid little heed to its dictums. That consensus all too often confused means with ends: it took privatization and trade liberalization as ends in themselves, rather than as means to more sustainable, equitable, and democratic growth. I talked there about many of the ways in which the Washington consensus had gone astray. It focused too much on price stability, rather than growth and the stability of output. It failed to recognize that strengthening financial institutions is every bit as important to economic stability as controlling budget deficits and increasing the money supply. It focused on privatization, but paid too little attention to the institutional infrastructure that is required to make markets work, and especially to the importance of competition. In today’s lecture, I want to go beyond these by now well-documented failures of the Washington consensus to begin providing the foundations of an alternative paradigm,","PeriodicalId":39357,"journal":{"name":"Applied Econometrics and International Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71366945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：