Issues in aligning assessments with the Common European Framework of Reference

Q2 Arts and Humanities Language Value Pub Date : 2014-06-05 DOI:10.6035/LANGUAGEV.2014.6.3
S. Papageorgiou
{"title":"Issues in aligning assessments with the Common European Framework of Reference","authors":"S. Papageorgiou","doi":"10.6035/LANGUAGEV.2014.6.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main aims of the Common European Framework of Reference is to help providers and users of assessments “describe the levels of proficiency required by existing standards, tests and examinations in order to facilitate comparisons between different systems of qualifications” (Council of Europe 2001: 21). Providers of language assessments both inside and outside Europe follow various methodologies to align their assessments with the CEFR levels, as several case studies show (Figueras and Noijons 2009; Martyniuk 2010). This paper discusses the use of the CEFR in the field of language assessment, focusing in particular on issues related to alignment. The paper presents the types of validity evidence that should be accumulated to support an alignment claim and concludes with directions for future research in order to further enhance our understanding of using the CEFR for the design of assessments and the interpretation of assessment results.","PeriodicalId":36244,"journal":{"name":"Language Value","volume":"6 1","pages":"15-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Value","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6035/LANGUAGEV.2014.6.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

One of the main aims of the Common European Framework of Reference is to help providers and users of assessments “describe the levels of proficiency required by existing standards, tests and examinations in order to facilitate comparisons between different systems of qualifications” (Council of Europe 2001: 21). Providers of language assessments both inside and outside Europe follow various methodologies to align their assessments with the CEFR levels, as several case studies show (Figueras and Noijons 2009; Martyniuk 2010). This paper discusses the use of the CEFR in the field of language assessment, focusing in particular on issues related to alignment. The paper presents the types of validity evidence that should be accumulated to support an alignment claim and concludes with directions for future research in order to further enhance our understanding of using the CEFR for the design of assessments and the interpretation of assessment results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使评估与欧洲共同参考框架保持一致的问题
《欧洲共同参考框架》的主要目标之一是帮助评估的提供者和使用者"说明现有标准、测试和考试所要求的熟练程度,以便在不同的资格制度之间进行比较"(欧洲委员会2001年:21)。正如几个案例研究所显示的那样,欧洲内外的语言评估提供商采用各种方法使其评估与CEFR水平保持一致(Figueras and Noijons 2009;Martyniuk 2010)。本文讨论了CEFR在语言评估领域的应用,特别关注与一致性相关的问题。本文提出了支持一致性声明需要积累的有效性证据类型,并总结了未来的研究方向,以进一步提高我们对使用CEFR设计评估和解释评估结果的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Value
Language Value Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pediatric Gender Identity: Gender-affirming care for Transgender & Gender Diverse Youth Eficàcia del model d'aprenentatge basat en projectes en llengua anglesa en educació superior: Un cas pràctic al grau de Turisme Objectius de desenvolupament sostenible i competències transversals mitjançant intercanvi virtual L2/3 English Language Proficiency and Career Opportunities: Perceptions of Indonesian University Graduates Recursos de valoración en textos promocionales hablados: Principiantes frente a profesionales del marketing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1