{"title":"New research genres and English prosody: an exploratory analysis of academic English intonation in Video Methods Articles in experimental biology","authors":"Ignacio Galve, Miguel A. Vela-Tafalla","doi":"10.6035/languagev.2020.12.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital multimedia environment where research communication develops nowadays has important consequences for EAP course design (Perez-Llantada 2016), since speaking and visuals are ever more decisive for communicative success (Crawford-Camiciottoli and Fortanet-Gomez 2015). However, intonation manuals have remained virtually unchanged for decades, reflecting a time of limited access to actual academic intonation in use. To countervail this situation, we draw on Hafner‘s (2018) multimodal analysis of experimental biology Video Methods Articles by examining the intonation used in an exploratory corpus of the Researcher‘s Introduction section, identified as the most hybrid in generic nature. Our analysis suggests that traditional Hallidayan intonation explained in handbooks like Hewings (2007) and Brazil (1994) fails to capture phenomena observed in our corpus. These intonational phenomena (mostly deviations from traditional tonicity) have been found to be consistent with genre- specific factors like communicative purpose and move structure. Consequently, a broader revision of academic intonation materials is proposed.","PeriodicalId":36244,"journal":{"name":"Language Value","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Value","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6035/languagev.2020.12.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The digital multimedia environment where research communication develops nowadays has important consequences for EAP course design (Perez-Llantada 2016), since speaking and visuals are ever more decisive for communicative success (Crawford-Camiciottoli and Fortanet-Gomez 2015). However, intonation manuals have remained virtually unchanged for decades, reflecting a time of limited access to actual academic intonation in use. To countervail this situation, we draw on Hafner‘s (2018) multimodal analysis of experimental biology Video Methods Articles by examining the intonation used in an exploratory corpus of the Researcher‘s Introduction section, identified as the most hybrid in generic nature. Our analysis suggests that traditional Hallidayan intonation explained in handbooks like Hewings (2007) and Brazil (1994) fails to capture phenomena observed in our corpus. These intonational phenomena (mostly deviations from traditional tonicity) have been found to be consistent with genre- specific factors like communicative purpose and move structure. Consequently, a broader revision of academic intonation materials is proposed.
如今研究交流发展的数字多媒体环境对EAP课程设计产生了重要影响(Perez-Llantada 2016),因为口语和视觉对交流成功起着越来越重要的作用(Crawford-Camiciottoli and Fortanet-Gomez 2015)。然而,语调手册几十年来几乎没有改变,反映了一段时间内对实际使用的学术语调的有限访问。为了抵消这种情况,我们借鉴了Hafner(2018)对实验生物学视频方法文章的多模态分析,通过检查研究人员介绍部分的探索性语料库中使用的语调,该语料库被确定为最混合的通用性质。我们的分析表明,Hewings(2007)和Brazil(1994)等手册中解释的传统哈利达扬语调未能捕捉到我们语料库中观察到的现象。这些语调现象(大多偏离传统语调)与交际目的和移动结构等体裁特定因素是一致的。因此,建议对学术语调材料进行更广泛的修订。