Mask wearing during neuropsychological assessment negatively impacts performance on verbal tests in older patients.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1037/pas0001261
Amber Thomas, Daniel Tranel
{"title":"Mask wearing during neuropsychological assessment negatively impacts performance on verbal tests in older patients.","authors":"Amber Thomas, Daniel Tranel","doi":"10.1037/pas0001261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Face masks are recommended to minimize the spread of COVID-19 and are required in many health care settings. Although masks have documented health advantages, they also negatively impact communication, an essential element of clinical neuropsychological assessment. Using a large clinical data set from a major academic medical center, we investigated the effect of mask wearing on neuropsychological test performance. Specifically, we examined performance on eight standard, widely used neuropsychological tests between a prepandemic (unmasked) and postpandemic (masked) group, composed of 754 and 837 adult patients, respectively. We compared performance on verbally mediated versus visually mediated tests, hypothesizing that the postpandemic group, compared to the prepandemic group, would perform significantly lower on the verbally mediated tests but not on the visually mediated tests. In partial support of the hypothesis, we found that the postpandemic group performed significantly worse on the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT; <i>p</i> = .001). Secondary analyses showed that age moderated the mask-related effect (<i>p</i> = .038), whereby patients 65 and older had significantly worse performance on Digit Span (<i>p</i> = .0027) and the AVLT (<i>p</i> = .0002) with masks on, while patients younger than 65 showed no significant differences. There were no significant differences on any visually mediated tests. These findings suggest that mask wearing during neuropsychological assessment compromises performance on verbally mediated tests in older patients. These findings are particularly relevant for neuropsychologists practicing in geriatric settings. Neuropsychologists performing assessments with masks should be aware that masks may artificially deflate patient scores for reasons unrelated to cognition or clinical condition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Face masks are recommended to minimize the spread of COVID-19 and are required in many health care settings. Although masks have documented health advantages, they also negatively impact communication, an essential element of clinical neuropsychological assessment. Using a large clinical data set from a major academic medical center, we investigated the effect of mask wearing on neuropsychological test performance. Specifically, we examined performance on eight standard, widely used neuropsychological tests between a prepandemic (unmasked) and postpandemic (masked) group, composed of 754 and 837 adult patients, respectively. We compared performance on verbally mediated versus visually mediated tests, hypothesizing that the postpandemic group, compared to the prepandemic group, would perform significantly lower on the verbally mediated tests but not on the visually mediated tests. In partial support of the hypothesis, we found that the postpandemic group performed significantly worse on the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT; p = .001). Secondary analyses showed that age moderated the mask-related effect (p = .038), whereby patients 65 and older had significantly worse performance on Digit Span (p = .0027) and the AVLT (p = .0002) with masks on, while patients younger than 65 showed no significant differences. There were no significant differences on any visually mediated tests. These findings suggest that mask wearing during neuropsychological assessment compromises performance on verbally mediated tests in older patients. These findings are particularly relevant for neuropsychologists practicing in geriatric settings. Neuropsychologists performing assessments with masks should be aware that masks may artificially deflate patient scores for reasons unrelated to cognition or clinical condition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经心理评估期间戴口罩对老年患者的言语测试表现产生负面影响。
建议戴口罩以最大限度地减少新冠肺炎的传播,许多医疗机构都需要戴口罩。尽管口罩有记录在案的健康优势,但它们也会对沟通产生负面影响,而沟通是临床神经心理评估的一个基本要素。使用一个主要学术医学中心的大量临床数据集,我们调查了戴口罩对神经心理测试成绩的影响。具体而言,我们检查了疫情前(未戴口罩)和疫情后(戴口罩)两组患者在八项标准的、广泛使用的神经心理学测试中的表现,这两组患者分别由754名和837名成年患者组成。我们比较了言语介导和视觉介导测试的表现,假设与疫情前组相比,疫情后组在言语介导测试中的表现明显较低,但在视觉介导的测试中则不然。在部分支持该假设的情况下,我们发现疫情后组在听觉言语学习测试(AVLT;p=0.001)中的表现明显较差。二次分析显示,年龄调节了口罩相关效应(p=0.038),因此65岁及以上的患者在戴口罩的情况下在数字跨度(p=0.0027)和AVLT(p=0.0002)上的表现明显较差,而年龄小于65岁的患者则无显著差异。在任何视觉介导的测试中都没有显著差异。这些发现表明,在神经心理评估中戴口罩会影响老年患者在言语介导测试中的表现。这些发现与在老年医学环境中执业的神经心理学家特别相关。使用口罩进行评估的神经心理学家应该意识到,由于与认知或临床状况无关的原因,口罩可能会人为降低患者评分。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
期刊最新文献
Identifying analogue samples of individuals with clinically significant social anxiety: Updating and combining cutoff scores on the Social Phobia Inventory and Sheehan Disability Scale. Measurement invariance of the higher-order model of Preschool Anxiety Scale (PAS) across child age, gender, parental anxiety, and pandemic period in England. Reexamining gender differences and the transdiagnostic boundaries of various conceptualizations of perseverative cognition. The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) self-report version: Factor structure, measurement invariance, and predictive validity in justice-involved male adolescents. Latent structure and measurement invariance of the Depression Self-Rating Scale for Children across sex and age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1