Validity and predictability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit for delirium among critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1111/nicc.12982
Yue Zhang, Dongmei Diao, Hao Zhang, Yongli Gao
{"title":"Validity and predictability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit for delirium among critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yue Zhang, Dongmei Diao, Hao Zhang, Yongli Gao","doi":"10.1111/nicc.12982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is the most common psychiatric diagnosis in the intensive care unit (ICU), and 55%-80% of delirium cases are unrecognized and undocumented the most popular validated instruments available to diagnose delirium for critically ill patients are the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). [Correction added on 16 October 2024, after first online publication: The Background section in Abstract has been added in this version.] AIM: To identify the validity and predictability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) for delirium in critically ill patients in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this systematic review, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE databases were searched for observational studies investigating delirium screening tools for ICU patients. In the meta-analysis, we combined the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve (AUC) of SROC to analysis the predictive value of CAM-ICU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.87) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97), respectively. The AUC point estimate of the SROC curve was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97). Race (Asian or Others) could affect the pooled sensitivity and specificity, and the analysis method (Patient- or Scan-based) and study design were not sources of heterogeneity for pooled sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAM-ICU is a valid and reliable tool for delirium prediction among ICU patients. When introducing CAM-ICU to assess delirium, it is necessary to localize its language and content to improve its predictive efficacy in different countries and different ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>In clinical practice, nurses can use CAM-ICU to evaluate delirium in critically ill patients in ICU. However, it is necessary to debug the language and content according to the application population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"1204-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium is the most common psychiatric diagnosis in the intensive care unit (ICU), and 55%-80% of delirium cases are unrecognized and undocumented the most popular validated instruments available to diagnose delirium for critically ill patients are the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). [Correction added on 16 October 2024, after first online publication: The Background section in Abstract has been added in this version.] AIM: To identify the validity and predictability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) for delirium in critically ill patients in the ICU.

Study design: In this systematic review, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE databases were searched for observational studies investigating delirium screening tools for ICU patients. In the meta-analysis, we combined the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve (AUC) of SROC to analysis the predictive value of CAM-ICU.

Results: Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.87) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97), respectively. The AUC point estimate of the SROC curve was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97). Race (Asian or Others) could affect the pooled sensitivity and specificity, and the analysis method (Patient- or Scan-based) and study design were not sources of heterogeneity for pooled sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions: The CAM-ICU is a valid and reliable tool for delirium prediction among ICU patients. When introducing CAM-ICU to assess delirium, it is necessary to localize its language and content to improve its predictive efficacy in different countries and different ethnic groups.

Relevance to clinical practice: In clinical practice, nurses can use CAM-ICU to evaluate delirium in critically ill patients in ICU. However, it is necessary to debug the language and content according to the application population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护室混乱评估方法对重症监护室危重患者谵妄的有效性和可预测性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:确定重症监护室(CAM-ICU)对ICU危重患者谵妄的困惑评估方法的有效性和可预测性。方法:在这篇系统综述中,检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央登记册和MEDLINE数据库,以寻找研究ICU患者谵妄筛查工具的观察性研究。在荟萃分析中,我们结合SROC的敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断优势比和曲线下面积(AUC)来分析CAM-ICU的预测价值。结果:29篇文章符合入选标准。合并的敏感性和特异性值分别为0.82(95%置信区间[CI]:0.75-0.87)和0.95(95%CI:0.93-0.97)。SROC曲线的AUC点估计值为0.96(95%可信区间:0.94-0.97)。种族(亚洲人或其他人)可能会影响合并的敏感性和特异性,分析方法(基于患者或扫描)和研究设计不是合并敏感性和特异性的异质性来源。结论:CAM-ICU是预测ICU患者谵妄的有效和可靠的工具。在引入CAM-ICU评估谵妄时,有必要对其语言和内容进行本地化,以提高其在不同国家和不同种族群体中的预测效力。与临床实践的相关性:在临床实践中,护士可以使用CAM-ICU来评估ICU危重患者的谵妄。但是,有必要根据应用程序的总体情况调试语言和内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
期刊最新文献
Burnout, collective efficacy and the social network of an intensive care unit. Relationship between ICU nurses' perception of patient safety, caring behaviour, professional self-efficacy and nursing deficits: A multiple mediation analysis. Patients' and family members' dyadic experience of post-operative delirium in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study. Difference between estimated and actual body weight in an intensive care unit-A service evaluation. Final-year nursing students' placement experiences in a critical care setting: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1