Dignity during work-integrated learning: Piloting an online learning resource for placement students and supervisors.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2023.2272775
Mahbub Sarkar, Corinne Davis, Olivia King, Kadheeja Wahid, Charlotte E Rees
{"title":"Dignity during work-integrated learning: Piloting an online learning resource for placement students and supervisors.","authors":"Mahbub Sarkar, Corinne Davis, Olivia King, Kadheeja Wahid, Charlotte E Rees","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2023.2272775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>What was the educational challenge?</b>Medical student abuse within work-integrated learning (WIL) is well-reported, with negative consequences for wellbeing, motivation, and learning. Conversely, workplace dignity, described as respecting the worth of others and self, has positive impacts on wellbeing, learning, and relationships for WIL students and supervisors. Stakeholders often struggle to articulate what workplace dignity means, and can downplay or do nothing in the face of WIL indignities.<b>What was the solution and how was this implemented?</b>We created an innovative research-informed online learning resource about WIL dignity to improve stakeholders' understandings and help them get the best from WIL placements ensuring these are dignified, safe, and educationally productive. The resource included three topics: (a) workplace dignity and why it matters; (b) upholding dignity; and (c) strengthening dignity.<b>What lessons were learned?</b>We conducted a pilot qualitative evaluation involving 13 semi-structured interviews with students and supervisors to elicit their views and experiences of the resource. Our key findings across three overarching categories were: (1) perceived benefits (motivations to complete the resource; content of the resource; online pedagogies); (2) potential applications of learning (reinforcing existing knowledge; developing new knowledge; promoting reflection; changing workplace practices); and (3) suggested improvements (barriers to resource use; resource content; online pedagogies; timing of resource implementation; embedding the resource in broader learning).<b>What are the next steps?</b>Although we identified numerous perceived benefits, and applications of learning, the findings suggested opportunities for further development, especially improving the resource's social interactivity. We recommend that further resource implementation includes student-educator and student-peer interactivity to maximise learning, and longitudinal evaluation of the resource.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"179-182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2272775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What was the educational challenge?Medical student abuse within work-integrated learning (WIL) is well-reported, with negative consequences for wellbeing, motivation, and learning. Conversely, workplace dignity, described as respecting the worth of others and self, has positive impacts on wellbeing, learning, and relationships for WIL students and supervisors. Stakeholders often struggle to articulate what workplace dignity means, and can downplay or do nothing in the face of WIL indignities.What was the solution and how was this implemented?We created an innovative research-informed online learning resource about WIL dignity to improve stakeholders' understandings and help them get the best from WIL placements ensuring these are dignified, safe, and educationally productive. The resource included three topics: (a) workplace dignity and why it matters; (b) upholding dignity; and (c) strengthening dignity.What lessons were learned?We conducted a pilot qualitative evaluation involving 13 semi-structured interviews with students and supervisors to elicit their views and experiences of the resource. Our key findings across three overarching categories were: (1) perceived benefits (motivations to complete the resource; content of the resource; online pedagogies); (2) potential applications of learning (reinforcing existing knowledge; developing new knowledge; promoting reflection; changing workplace practices); and (3) suggested improvements (barriers to resource use; resource content; online pedagogies; timing of resource implementation; embedding the resource in broader learning).What are the next steps?Although we identified numerous perceived benefits, and applications of learning, the findings suggested opportunities for further development, especially improving the resource's social interactivity. We recommend that further resource implementation includes student-educator and student-peer interactivity to maximise learning, and longitudinal evaluation of the resource.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作中的尊严综合学习:为实习学生和主管试行在线学习资源。
教育方面的挑战是什么?医学生在工作综合学习(WIL)中受到虐待的报道很多,对健康、动机和学习都有负面影响。相反,工作场所的尊严,被描述为尊重他人和自我的价值,对WIL学生和主管的幸福感、学习和关系有积极影响。利益相关者往往难以阐明工作场所尊严的含义,面对WIL的侮辱,他们可以轻描淡写或无所作为。解决方案是什么?是如何实现的?我们创建了一个创新的基于研究的关于WIL尊严的在线学习资源,以提高利益相关者的理解,并帮助他们从WIL安置中获得最佳效果,确保这些安置是有尊严的、安全的,并在教育上富有成效。该资源包括三个主题:(a)工作场所的尊严及其重要性;(b) 维护尊严;以及(c)加强尊严。吸取了什么教训?我们进行了一项试点定性评估,包括对学生和主管的13次半结构化访谈,以了解他们对该资源的看法和经验。我们在三个总体类别中的主要发现是:(1)感知利益(完成资源的动机;资源的内容;在线教学法);(2) 学习的潜在应用(强化现有知识;发展新知识;促进反思;改变工作场所的做法);以及(3)建议的改进措施(资源使用的障碍;资源内容;在线教学法;资源实施的时机;将资源融入更广泛的学习)。下一步是什么?尽管我们发现了学习的许多可感知的好处和应用,但这些发现为进一步发展提供了机会,尤其是改善资源的社会互动性。我们建议进一步的资源实施包括学生教育者和学生同伴互动,以最大限度地提高学习效果,并对资源进行纵向评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Edgar Dale's Pyramid of Learning in medical education: Is it still a scientific myth after Ken Masters' research? To use or not to use: ERIC database for medical education research. "They already trusted us a lot": Allied health students' experiences of an innovative hospital, service-focussed placement model. Response to: 'When reality no longer meets the curriculum, what needs to adapt?' The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: A quasi-experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1