Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization.

IF 4.3 3区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Journal of Machine Learning Research Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Wei Wang, Matthew Stephens
{"title":"Empirical Bayes Matrix Factorization.","authors":"Wei Wang, Matthew Stephens","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Matrix factorization methods, which include Factor analysis (FA) and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), are widely used for inferring and summarizing structure in multivariate data. Many such methods use a penalty or prior distribution to achieve sparse representations (\"Sparse FA/PCA\"), and a key question is how much sparsity to induce. Here we introduce a general Empirical Bayes approach to matrix factorization (EBMF), whose key feature is that it estimates the appropriate amount of sparsity by estimating prior distributions from the observed data. The approach is very flexible: it allows for a wide range of different prior families and allows that each component of the matrix factorization may exhibit a different amount of sparsity. The key to this flexibility is the use of a variational approximation, which we show effectively reduces fitting the EBMF model to solving a simpler problem, the so-called \"normal means\" problem. We demonstrate the benefits of EBMF with sparse priors through both numerical comparisons with competing methods and through analysis of data from the GTEx (Genotype Tissue Expression) project on genetic associations across 44 human tissues. In numerical comparisons EBMF often provides more accurate inferences than other methods. In the GTEx data, EBMF identifies interpretable structure that agrees with known relationships among human tissues. Software implementing our approach is available at https://github.com/stephenslab/flashr.</p>","PeriodicalId":50161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Machine Learning Research","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Machine Learning Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Matrix factorization methods, which include Factor analysis (FA) and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), are widely used for inferring and summarizing structure in multivariate data. Many such methods use a penalty or prior distribution to achieve sparse representations ("Sparse FA/PCA"), and a key question is how much sparsity to induce. Here we introduce a general Empirical Bayes approach to matrix factorization (EBMF), whose key feature is that it estimates the appropriate amount of sparsity by estimating prior distributions from the observed data. The approach is very flexible: it allows for a wide range of different prior families and allows that each component of the matrix factorization may exhibit a different amount of sparsity. The key to this flexibility is the use of a variational approximation, which we show effectively reduces fitting the EBMF model to solving a simpler problem, the so-called "normal means" problem. We demonstrate the benefits of EBMF with sparse priors through both numerical comparisons with competing methods and through analysis of data from the GTEx (Genotype Tissue Expression) project on genetic associations across 44 human tissues. In numerical comparisons EBMF often provides more accurate inferences than other methods. In the GTEx data, EBMF identifies interpretable structure that agrees with known relationships among human tissues. Software implementing our approach is available at https://github.com/stephenslab/flashr.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经验贝叶斯矩阵分解。
矩阵分解方法,包括因子分析(FA)和主成分分析(PCA),被广泛用于推断和总结多元数据中的结构。许多这样的方法使用惩罚或先验分布来实现稀疏表示(“稀疏FA/PCA”),关键问题是诱导多少稀疏性。在这里,我们介绍了一种用于矩阵分解(EBMF)的通用经验贝叶斯方法,其关键特征是通过从观测数据中估计先验分布来估计适当的稀疏性。该方法非常灵活:它允许广泛的不同先验族,并允许矩阵分解的每个分量可能表现出不同的稀疏性。这种灵活性的关键是使用变分近似,我们证明了变分近似有效地减少了EBMF模型的拟合,从而解决了一个更简单的问题,即所谓的“正态均值”问题。我们通过与竞争方法的数值比较以及对GTEx(基因型组织表达)项目中44个人类组织的遗传关联数据的分析,证明了稀疏先验的EBMF的优势。在数值比较中,EBMF通常比其他方法提供更准确的推断。在GTEx数据中,EBMF确定了与人类组织之间的已知关系一致的可解释结构。实现我们方法的软件可在https://github.com/stephenslab/flashr.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Machine Learning Research
Journal of Machine Learning Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) provides an international forum for the electronic and paper publication of high-quality scholarly articles in all areas of machine learning. All published papers are freely available online. JMLR has a commitment to rigorous yet rapid reviewing. JMLR seeks previously unpublished papers on machine learning that contain: new principled algorithms with sound empirical validation, and with justification of theoretical, psychological, or biological nature; experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insight into the design and behavior of learning in intelligent systems; accounts of applications of existing techniques that shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of the methods; formalization of new learning tasks (e.g., in the context of new applications) and of methods for assessing performance on those tasks; development of new analytical frameworks that advance theoretical studies of practical learning methods; computational models of data from natural learning systems at the behavioral or neural level; or extremely well-written surveys of existing work.
期刊最新文献
Convergence for nonconvex ADMM, with applications to CT imaging. Effect-Invariant Mechanisms for Policy Generalization. Nonparametric Regression for 3D Point Cloud Learning. Batch Normalization Preconditioning for Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics Why Self-Attention is Natural for Sequence-to-Sequence Problems? A Perspective from Symmetries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1