Evaluation of body weight–based dosing, alternative dosing regimens, and treatment interruptions for α1-proteinase inhibitors and implications on biochemical efficacy in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency
{"title":"Evaluation of body weight–based dosing, alternative dosing regimens, and treatment interruptions for α1-proteinase inhibitors and implications on biochemical efficacy in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency","authors":"Zhaoyang Li , Mitali Gaurav , Leman Yel","doi":"10.1016/j.pupt.2023.102265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The recommended standard dose for α<sub>1</sub>-proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) augmentation therapy is 60 mg/kg once-weekly (QW) intravenous (IV) infusions that aim to maintain systemic A1PI levels >11 μM, the biochemical efficacy threshold, in patients with α<sub>1</sub>-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). However, this standard dose may not be optimal for all patients. Body weight–based dosing, alternative dosing regimens, and treatment interruption periods were evaluated using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling and simulations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A nonlinear mixed-effects PopPK model with covariate effects was developed using data from 3 clinical studies investigating 60 mg/kg QW IV A1PI infusions in patients with AATD (n = 65) to evaluate A1PI pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics. Model-based simulations were conducted for predefined body weight categories, alternative dosing regimens (60–180 mg/kg QW or once every 2 weeks [Q2W]), and treatment interruption periods ranging from 3 to 14 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A1PI PK characteristics were well described by a 2-compartment turnover model with zero-order input and linear elimination. Body weight was a statistically significant determinant of variability in central volume of distribution. Model-based simulations suggested that patients with a higher body weight may attain the 11 μM threshold quicker than patients with a lower body weight and that QW dosing was better at maintaining A1PI levels >11 μM, even when higher Q2W doses were administered. Missing a dose for as few as 3 days could result in A1PI levels <11 μM.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Findings suggest that doses higher than 60 mg/kg administered QW might be more clinically beneficial in some patients with AATD, and that body weight should be considered in dose optimization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20799,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553923000779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The recommended standard dose for α1-proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) augmentation therapy is 60 mg/kg once-weekly (QW) intravenous (IV) infusions that aim to maintain systemic A1PI levels >11 μM, the biochemical efficacy threshold, in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). However, this standard dose may not be optimal for all patients. Body weight–based dosing, alternative dosing regimens, and treatment interruption periods were evaluated using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling and simulations.
Methods
A nonlinear mixed-effects PopPK model with covariate effects was developed using data from 3 clinical studies investigating 60 mg/kg QW IV A1PI infusions in patients with AATD (n = 65) to evaluate A1PI pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics. Model-based simulations were conducted for predefined body weight categories, alternative dosing regimens (60–180 mg/kg QW or once every 2 weeks [Q2W]), and treatment interruption periods ranging from 3 to 14 days.
Results
A1PI PK characteristics were well described by a 2-compartment turnover model with zero-order input and linear elimination. Body weight was a statistically significant determinant of variability in central volume of distribution. Model-based simulations suggested that patients with a higher body weight may attain the 11 μM threshold quicker than patients with a lower body weight and that QW dosing was better at maintaining A1PI levels >11 μM, even when higher Q2W doses were administered. Missing a dose for as few as 3 days could result in A1PI levels <11 μM.
Discussion
Findings suggest that doses higher than 60 mg/kg administered QW might be more clinically beneficial in some patients with AATD, and that body weight should be considered in dose optimization.
期刊介绍:
Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (formerly Pulmonary Pharmacology) is concerned with lung pharmacology from molecular to clinical aspects. The subject matter encompasses the major diseases of the lung including asthma, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary circulation, ARDS, carcinoma, bronchitis, emphysema and drug delivery. Laboratory and clinical research on man and animals will be considered including studies related to chemotherapy of cancer, tuberculosis and infection. In addition to original research papers the journal will include review articles and book reviews.
Research Areas Include:
• All major diseases of the lung
• Physiology
• Pathology
• Drug delivery
• Metabolism
• Pulmonary Toxicology.