Evaluation of body weight–based dosing, alternative dosing regimens, and treatment interruptions for α1-proteinase inhibitors and implications on biochemical efficacy in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.pupt.2023.102265
Zhaoyang Li , Mitali Gaurav , Leman Yel
{"title":"Evaluation of body weight–based dosing, alternative dosing regimens, and treatment interruptions for α1-proteinase inhibitors and implications on biochemical efficacy in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency","authors":"Zhaoyang Li ,&nbsp;Mitali Gaurav ,&nbsp;Leman Yel","doi":"10.1016/j.pupt.2023.102265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The recommended standard dose for α<sub>1</sub>-proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) augmentation therapy is 60 mg/kg once-weekly (QW) intravenous (IV) infusions that aim to maintain systemic A1PI levels &gt;11 μM, the biochemical efficacy threshold, in patients with α<sub>1</sub>-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). However, this standard dose may not be optimal for all patients. Body weight–based dosing, alternative dosing regimens, and treatment interruption periods were evaluated using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling and simulations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A nonlinear mixed-effects PopPK model with covariate effects was developed using data from 3 clinical studies investigating 60 mg/kg QW IV A1PI infusions in patients with AATD (n = 65) to evaluate A1PI pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics. Model-based simulations were conducted for predefined body weight categories, alternative dosing regimens (60–180 mg/kg QW or once every 2 weeks [Q2W]), and treatment interruption periods ranging from 3 to 14 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A1PI PK characteristics were well described by a 2-compartment turnover model with zero-order input and linear elimination. Body weight was a statistically significant determinant of variability in central volume of distribution. Model-based simulations suggested that patients with a higher body weight may attain the 11 μM threshold quicker than patients with a lower body weight and that QW dosing was better at maintaining A1PI levels &gt;11 μM, even when higher Q2W doses were administered. Missing a dose for as few as 3 days could result in A1PI levels &lt;11 μM.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Findings suggest that doses higher than 60 mg/kg administered QW might be more clinically beneficial in some patients with AATD, and that body weight should be considered in dose optimization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20799,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553923000779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The recommended standard dose for α1-proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) augmentation therapy is 60 mg/kg once-weekly (QW) intravenous (IV) infusions that aim to maintain systemic A1PI levels >11 μM, the biochemical efficacy threshold, in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). However, this standard dose may not be optimal for all patients. Body weight–based dosing, alternative dosing regimens, and treatment interruption periods were evaluated using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling and simulations.

Methods

A nonlinear mixed-effects PopPK model with covariate effects was developed using data from 3 clinical studies investigating 60 mg/kg QW IV A1PI infusions in patients with AATD (n = 65) to evaluate A1PI pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics. Model-based simulations were conducted for predefined body weight categories, alternative dosing regimens (60–180 mg/kg QW or once every 2 weeks [Q2W]), and treatment interruption periods ranging from 3 to 14 days.

Results

A1PI PK characteristics were well described by a 2-compartment turnover model with zero-order input and linear elimination. Body weight was a statistically significant determinant of variability in central volume of distribution. Model-based simulations suggested that patients with a higher body weight may attain the 11 μM threshold quicker than patients with a lower body weight and that QW dosing was better at maintaining A1PI levels >11 μM, even when higher Q2W doses were administered. Missing a dose for as few as 3 days could result in A1PI levels <11 μM.

Discussion

Findings suggest that doses higher than 60 mg/kg administered QW might be more clinically beneficial in some patients with AATD, and that body weight should be considered in dose optimization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
α1-蛋白酶抑制剂基于体重给药、替代给药方案和治疗中断的评估,以及对α1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症患者生化疗效的影响。
引言:α1-蛋白酶抑制剂(A1PI)增强治疗的推荐标准剂量为60 mg/kg,每周一次(QW)静脉(IV)输注,目的是在α1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症(AATD)患者中保持全身A1PI水平>11μM,即生化疗效阈值。然而,这种标准剂量可能不是所有患者的最佳剂量。使用群体药代动力学(PopPK)建模和模拟评估基于体重的给药、替代给药方案和治疗中断期。方法:利用3项临床研究的数据,建立具有协变量效应的非线性混合效应PopPK模型,研究AATD患者(n=65)静脉输注60mg/kg QW A1PI的情况,以评估A1PI的药代动力学(PK)特征。对预定义的体重类别、替代给药方案(60-180 mg/kg QW或每2周一次[Q2W])和3至14天的治疗中断期进行了基于模型的模拟。结果:采用零订单输入和线性消去的两室周转模型,很好地描述了A1PI PK特征。体重是分布中心体积变异性的一个具有统计学意义的决定因素。基于模型的模拟表明,体重较高的患者可能比体重较低的患者更快地达到11μM的阈值,QW给药更能保持A1PI水平>11μM,即使给予更高的Q2W剂量。错过一个剂量长达3天可能会导致A1PI水平讨论:研究结果表明,QW给药剂量高于60 mg/kg可能对一些AATD患者更具临床益处,在剂量优化中应考虑体重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (formerly Pulmonary Pharmacology) is concerned with lung pharmacology from molecular to clinical aspects. The subject matter encompasses the major diseases of the lung including asthma, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary circulation, ARDS, carcinoma, bronchitis, emphysema and drug delivery. Laboratory and clinical research on man and animals will be considered including studies related to chemotherapy of cancer, tuberculosis and infection. In addition to original research papers the journal will include review articles and book reviews. Research Areas Include: • All major diseases of the lung • Physiology • Pathology • Drug delivery • Metabolism • Pulmonary Toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Triple inhaled therapy in asthma: beliefs, behaviours and doubts. Prevalence and clinical significance of pre- and post-bronchodilator airflow obstruction in COPD patients Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an immunomodulatory intervention in COVID-19-induced ARDS: Exploring clinical outcomes and transcriptomic signatures in a randomised controlled trial Interaction between fluticasone furoate and umeclidinium in passively sensitized isolated human airways Chest CT assess the impact of omalizumab treatment on airway remodeling in refractory asthma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1