Reading Interventions for Students in Grades 3-12 With Significant Word Reading Difficulties.

IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Learning Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1177/00222194231207556
Alexis N Boucher, Bethany H Bhat, Nathan H Clemens, Sharon Vaughn, Katherine O'Donnell
{"title":"Reading Interventions for Students in Grades 3-12 With Significant Word Reading Difficulties.","authors":"Alexis N Boucher, Bethany H Bhat, Nathan H Clemens, Sharon Vaughn, Katherine O'Donnell","doi":"10.1177/00222194231207556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most students with reading difficulties struggle to read words. We examined intervention effects for students with <i>significant</i> word reading difficulties (SWRD; standard score of 80 on at least one pretest measure of word reading), which includes individuals with or at risk for dyslexia. We investigated: (a) What are the effects of reading interventions for students in Grades 3-12 with SWRD? and (b) What intervention features (i.e., instructional components and elements of dosage) are related to improved reading outcomes for the target population? A meta-analysis of 22 studies and 208 effect sizes revealed a statistically significant, positive, mean effect (<i>g</i> = 0.14, standard error [<i>SE</i>] = 0.04, <i>p</i> = .01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.04, 0.23]) of interventions for the target population. Subset analyses revealed positive, statistically significant intervention effects on measures of pseudoword reading (<i>g</i> = 0.38, <i>SE</i> = 0.07, <i>p</i> = .0003, 95% CI [0.21, 0.54]) and pseudoword reading fluency (<i>g</i> = 0.29, <i>SE</i> = 0.09, <i>p</i> = .010, 95% CI [0.09, 0.49]). Moderator analyses yielded statistically significant, positive effects associated with increased total hours of intervention, β = 0.003, <i>SE</i> = 0.0009, <i>t</i>(8.31) = 3.58, <i>p</i> = .007. Overall, findings indicate a need for interventions that improve generalized real-world reading for the target population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"203-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194231207556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most students with reading difficulties struggle to read words. We examined intervention effects for students with significant word reading difficulties (SWRD; standard score of 80 on at least one pretest measure of word reading), which includes individuals with or at risk for dyslexia. We investigated: (a) What are the effects of reading interventions for students in Grades 3-12 with SWRD? and (b) What intervention features (i.e., instructional components and elements of dosage) are related to improved reading outcomes for the target population? A meta-analysis of 22 studies and 208 effect sizes revealed a statistically significant, positive, mean effect (g = 0.14, standard error [SE] = 0.04, p = .01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.04, 0.23]) of interventions for the target population. Subset analyses revealed positive, statistically significant intervention effects on measures of pseudoword reading (g = 0.38, SE = 0.07, p = .0003, 95% CI [0.21, 0.54]) and pseudoword reading fluency (g = 0.29, SE = 0.09, p = .010, 95% CI [0.09, 0.49]). Moderator analyses yielded statistically significant, positive effects associated with increased total hours of intervention, β = 0.003, SE = 0.0009, t(8.31) = 3.58, p = .007. Overall, findings indicate a need for interventions that improve generalized real-world reading for the target population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3-12年级单词阅读困难学生的阅读干预。
大多数有阅读困难的学生很难读懂单词。我们研究了对有严重单词阅读困难的学生的干预效果(SWRD;至少一项单词阅读前测试的标准分为80),其中包括有阅读障碍或有阅读障碍风险的人。我们调查了:(a)阅读干预对3-12年级SWRD学生的影响是什么?以及(b)哪些干预特征(即指导成分和剂量要素)与目标人群阅读结果的改善有关?一项对22项研究和208个效应大小的荟萃分析显示,目标人群的干预措施具有统计学意义的阳性平均效应(g=0.14,标准误差[SE]=0.04,p=0.01,95%置信区间[CI]:[0.042])。子集分析显示,对假字阅读(g=0.38,SE=0.07,p=.0003,95%CI[0.21,0.54])和假字阅读流畅度(g=0.29,SE=0.09,p=.010,95%CI[0.09,0.49],SE=0.0009,t(8.31)=3.58,p=.007。总体而言,研究结果表明,需要采取干预措施,提高目标人群的普遍现实世界阅读能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.
期刊最新文献
Derivational Morphology Training in French-Speaking 9- to 14- Year-Old Children and Adolescents With Developmental Dyslexia: Does It Improve Morphological Awareness, Reading, and Spelling Outcome Measures? Graph Out Loud: Pre-Service Teachers' Data Decisions and Interpretations of CBM Progress Graphs. What Environments Support Reading Growth Among Current Compared With Former Reading Intervention Recipients? A Multilevel Analysis of Students and Their Schools. Ongoing Teacher Support for Data-Based Individualization: A Meta-Analysis and Synthesis. The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Clarifying the Relationship Between Free Appropriate Public Education and Least Restrictive Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1