Bladder Repair With Irrigation and Debridement and Open Reduction Internal Fixation of the Anterior Pelvic Ring Is Safe and Decreases Risk of Infection in Pelvic Ring Injuries With Extraperitoneal Bladder Ruptures.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002720
Augustine M Saiz, Edmond O'Donnell, Patrick Kellam, Courtney Cleary, Ximia Moore, Blake J Schultz, Ryan Mayer, Adeet Amin, Joshua Gary, Stephen J Warner, Milton L Routt, Jonathan G Eastman
{"title":"Bladder Repair With Irrigation and Debridement and Open Reduction Internal Fixation of the Anterior Pelvic Ring Is Safe and Decreases Risk of Infection in Pelvic Ring Injuries With Extraperitoneal Bladder Ruptures.","authors":"Augustine M Saiz, Edmond O'Donnell, Patrick Kellam, Courtney Cleary, Ximia Moore, Blake J Schultz, Ryan Mayer, Adeet Amin, Joshua Gary, Stephen J Warner, Milton L Routt, Jonathan G Eastman","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the incidence of infection in nonoperative versus operative management of extraperitoneal bladder ruptures in patients with pelvic ring injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 2 prospectively collected trauma registries.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two Level 1 trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients with operative pelvic ring injuries, 68 (6%) had extraperitoneal bladder ruptures.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence and associated risk factors of deep pelvic infection requiring return to OR for surgical debridement. Secondary outcomes included quality of reduction, other complications, and radiographic union. Comparisons were made based on the status of any associated bladder injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1127 patients with operative pelvic ring injuries, 68 patients had extraperitoneal bladder ruptures, 55 had bladder repair and 13 did not. Of those 13 without repair, none had ORIF of the anterior pelvic ring. Patients without bladder repair had an increased odds of infection 17-fold compared to patients who did have a repair performed (OR 16.9, 95% CI 1.75 - 164, P = 0.01). Other associated factors for deep pelvic infection included use of suprapubic catheter ( p < 0.02) and a closed reduction of the anterior ring ( p < 0.01). Patients undergoing anterior ring ORIF and bladder repair had improved reductions and no increased infection risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Operative repair of extraperitoneal bladder ruptures decreases risk of infection in patients with pelvic ring injuries. Additionally, ORIF of the anterior pelvic ring does not increase the risk of infection and results in better reductions compared to closed reduction. Treatment algorithms for these combined injuries should consider recommending early bladder repair and anterior pelvic ORIF.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"72-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the incidence of infection in nonoperative versus operative management of extraperitoneal bladder ruptures in patients with pelvic ring injuries.

Methods:

Design: A retrospective cohort study of 2 prospectively collected trauma registries.

Setting: Two Level 1 trauma centers.

Patient selection criteria: Patients with operative pelvic ring injuries, 68 (6%) had extraperitoneal bladder ruptures.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was the incidence and associated risk factors of deep pelvic infection requiring return to OR for surgical debridement. Secondary outcomes included quality of reduction, other complications, and radiographic union. Comparisons were made based on the status of any associated bladder injury.

Results: Of 1127 patients with operative pelvic ring injuries, 68 patients had extraperitoneal bladder ruptures, 55 had bladder repair and 13 did not. Of those 13 without repair, none had ORIF of the anterior pelvic ring. Patients without bladder repair had an increased odds of infection 17-fold compared to patients who did have a repair performed (OR 16.9, 95% CI 1.75 - 164, P = 0.01). Other associated factors for deep pelvic infection included use of suprapubic catheter ( p < 0.02) and a closed reduction of the anterior ring ( p < 0.01). Patients undergoing anterior ring ORIF and bladder repair had improved reductions and no increased infection risk.

Conclusions: Operative repair of extraperitoneal bladder ruptures decreases risk of infection in patients with pelvic ring injuries. Additionally, ORIF of the anterior pelvic ring does not increase the risk of infection and results in better reductions compared to closed reduction. Treatment algorithms for these combined injuries should consider recommending early bladder repair and anterior pelvic ORIF.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲洗、清创和骨盆前环切开复位内固定的膀胱修复是安全的,并降低了腹膜外膀胱破裂的骨盆环损伤的感染风险。
目的:确定骨盆环损伤患者腹膜外膀胱破裂的非手术和手术治疗中感染的发生率。设置:两个一级创伤中心。设计:对两个前瞻性收集的创伤登记进行回顾性队列研究。患者/参与者:1127名骨盆环手术损伤患者中,68名(6%)腹膜外膀胱破裂。主要结果测量:主要结果是需要返回手术室进行清创术的盆腔深部感染的发生率和相关风险因素。次要结果包括复位质量、其他并发症和放射学结合。结果:68例腹膜外膀胱破裂的盆腔环损伤患者中,55例进行了膀胱修复,13例未进行膀胱修复。在13例未经修复的患者中,没有一例发生骨盆前环ORIF。与进行膀胱修复的患者相比,未进行膀胱修复患者的感染几率增加了17倍(OR 16.9,95%CI 1.75-164,P=0.01)。盆腔深部感染的其他相关因素包括使用耻骨上导管(P<0.02)和前环闭合复位(P<0.01)减少且不增加感染风险。结论:腹膜外膀胱破裂的手术修复可降低骨盆环损伤患者感染的风险。此外,与闭合复位相比,骨盆前环的ORIF不会增加感染风险,并能更好地复位。这些合并损伤的治疗算法应考虑建议早期膀胱修复和骨盆前ORIF。证据级别:治疗级别III。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of Expedited Time to Hip Fracture Surgery Differs Based on Patient Risk Profile. The Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy: A Safe Alternative Approach for Lateral Tibial Plateau Fractures. The Effects of a Stepped-Care Mental Health Program on Trauma Recidivism at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Tibial Malalignment is an Independent Predictor of Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1