Alexey Ruchay , Vitaly Kober , Konstantin Dorofeev , Vladimir Kolpakov , Kinispay Dzhulamanov , Vsevolod Kalschikov , Hao Guo
{"title":"Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for predicting live weight of Hereford cows","authors":"Alexey Ruchay , Vitaly Kober , Konstantin Dorofeev , Vladimir Kolpakov , Kinispay Dzhulamanov , Vsevolod Kalschikov , Hao Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2022.106837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Body weight prediction of livestock helps us to control the health of animals, efficiently conduct genetic selection, and estimate the optimal slaughter time. Precise and expensive industrial scales are used to measure live weight on large farms. A more affordable alternative is weight estimation by indirect methods, based on morphometric measurements of livestock, followed by the use of regression equations relating such measurements to body weight. Manual measurements on animals with a tape measure require trained workers and are stressful for both the worker and animal. Nowadays, machine learning technologies are being used to accurately predict body weight. This paper provides a comparative analysis of various machine learning methods for estimating the live weight of Hereford cows in terms of the coefficient of determination, root mean squared error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. We show that machine learning algorithms perform better than common linear regression algorithms. Specifically, the ExtraTreesRegressor algorithm yields the highest prediction quality of the live weight of Hereford cows in terms of <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> among the tested machine learning algorithms. Potential applicability of these methods in the livestock industry is also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 106837"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169922001545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Body weight prediction of livestock helps us to control the health of animals, efficiently conduct genetic selection, and estimate the optimal slaughter time. Precise and expensive industrial scales are used to measure live weight on large farms. A more affordable alternative is weight estimation by indirect methods, based on morphometric measurements of livestock, followed by the use of regression equations relating such measurements to body weight. Manual measurements on animals with a tape measure require trained workers and are stressful for both the worker and animal. Nowadays, machine learning technologies are being used to accurately predict body weight. This paper provides a comparative analysis of various machine learning methods for estimating the live weight of Hereford cows in terms of the coefficient of determination, root mean squared error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. We show that machine learning algorithms perform better than common linear regression algorithms. Specifically, the ExtraTreesRegressor algorithm yields the highest prediction quality of the live weight of Hereford cows in terms of among the tested machine learning algorithms. Potential applicability of these methods in the livestock industry is also discussed.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.