Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for predicting live weight of Hereford cows

IF 7.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2022.106837
Alexey Ruchay , Vitaly Kober , Konstantin Dorofeev , Vladimir Kolpakov , Kinispay Dzhulamanov , Vsevolod Kalschikov , Hao Guo
{"title":"Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for predicting live weight of Hereford cows","authors":"Alexey Ruchay ,&nbsp;Vitaly Kober ,&nbsp;Konstantin Dorofeev ,&nbsp;Vladimir Kolpakov ,&nbsp;Kinispay Dzhulamanov ,&nbsp;Vsevolod Kalschikov ,&nbsp;Hao Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2022.106837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Body weight prediction of livestock helps us to control the health of animals, efficiently conduct genetic selection, and estimate the optimal slaughter time. Precise and expensive industrial scales are used to measure live weight on large farms. A more affordable alternative is weight estimation by indirect methods, based on morphometric measurements of livestock, followed by the use of regression equations relating such measurements to body weight. Manual measurements on animals with a tape measure require trained workers and are stressful for both the worker and animal. Nowadays, machine learning technologies are being used to accurately predict body weight. This paper provides a comparative analysis of various machine learning methods for estimating the live weight of Hereford cows in terms of the coefficient of determination, root mean squared error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. We show that machine learning algorithms perform better than common linear regression algorithms. Specifically, the ExtraTreesRegressor algorithm yields the highest prediction quality of the live weight of Hereford cows in terms of <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> among the tested machine learning algorithms. Potential applicability of these methods in the livestock industry is also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 106837"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169922001545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Body weight prediction of livestock helps us to control the health of animals, efficiently conduct genetic selection, and estimate the optimal slaughter time. Precise and expensive industrial scales are used to measure live weight on large farms. A more affordable alternative is weight estimation by indirect methods, based on morphometric measurements of livestock, followed by the use of regression equations relating such measurements to body weight. Manual measurements on animals with a tape measure require trained workers and are stressful for both the worker and animal. Nowadays, machine learning technologies are being used to accurately predict body weight. This paper provides a comparative analysis of various machine learning methods for estimating the live weight of Hereford cows in terms of the coefficient of determination, root mean squared error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. We show that machine learning algorithms perform better than common linear regression algorithms. Specifically, the ExtraTreesRegressor algorithm yields the highest prediction quality of the live weight of Hereford cows in terms of R2 among the tested machine learning algorithms. Potential applicability of these methods in the livestock industry is also discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测赫里福德奶牛活重的机器学习算法的比较分析
牲畜的体重预测有助于我们控制动物的健康,有效地进行基因选择,并估计最佳屠宰时间。大型农场使用精密而昂贵的工业天平来测量活体重。一种更实惠的替代方法是基于牲畜形态计量测量的间接方法估计体重,然后使用将这些测量与体重相关的回归方程。用卷尺对动物进行手动测量需要经过培训的工人,这对工人和动物来说都是有压力的。如今,机器学习技术正被用来准确预测体重。本文从决定系数、均方根误差、平均绝对误差和平均绝对百分比误差的角度,对估计赫里福德奶牛活重的各种机器学习方法进行了比较分析。我们证明了机器学习算法比常见的线性回归算法性能更好。具体而言,在测试的机器学习算法中,ExtraTreesRegressor算法在R2方面产生了赫里福德奶牛活重的最高预测质量。还讨论了这些方法在畜牧业中的潜在适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Fusion of CREStereo and MobileViT-Pose for rapid measurement of cattle body size CustomBottleneck-VGGNet: Advanced tomato leaf disease identification for sustainable agriculture Yield estimation in precision viticulture by combining deep segmentation and depth-based clustering A hybrid remotely operated underwater vehicle for maintenance operations in aquaculture: Practical insights from Greek fish farms Study on seeding delay time and lag distance of automatic section control system for maize seeder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1