Unconventionally Green: Monetary Policy between Engagement and Conflicting Goals

IF 7.6 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Review of Economics and Statistics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1515/roe-2023-0024
Lena Liebich, Lukas Nöh, Felix Rutkowski, Milena Schwarz
{"title":"Unconventionally Green: Monetary Policy between Engagement and Conflicting Goals","authors":"Lena Liebich, Lukas Nöh, Felix Rutkowski, Milena Schwarz","doi":"10.1515/roe-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We study the potential role of the ECB in supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy by decarbonizing the corporate sector purchase programme (CSPP). We demonstrate that the carbon intensity of CSPP purchases is determined by three main factors: First, by the CSPP-eligibility criteria, as these tend to exclude bonds from low-emission sectors. Second, by the underlying structure of the bond market, as this tends to be skewed towards carbon-intensive sectors. Third, among the eligible bonds, the ECB tends to select those from relatively emission-intensive sectors. To decarbonize the CSPP, the ECB can theoretically act along these three lines: (i) adjust the CSPP-eligibility criteria to expand the range of eligible low-carbon assets, (ii), revise the principle of market neutrality to tilt the CSPP portfolio towards low-carbon companies, or, (iii), purchase so far neglected low-carbon bonds within the current eligibility and market neutrality framework. As all approaches have either very limited effects or are associated with significant theoretical and practical concerns, we conclude that their contribution to the success of active green monetary policy is not guaranteed, while at the same time risks arise for a monetary policy that targets price stability.","PeriodicalId":48456,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economics and Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2023-0024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We study the potential role of the ECB in supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy by decarbonizing the corporate sector purchase programme (CSPP). We demonstrate that the carbon intensity of CSPP purchases is determined by three main factors: First, by the CSPP-eligibility criteria, as these tend to exclude bonds from low-emission sectors. Second, by the underlying structure of the bond market, as this tends to be skewed towards carbon-intensive sectors. Third, among the eligible bonds, the ECB tends to select those from relatively emission-intensive sectors. To decarbonize the CSPP, the ECB can theoretically act along these three lines: (i) adjust the CSPP-eligibility criteria to expand the range of eligible low-carbon assets, (ii), revise the principle of market neutrality to tilt the CSPP portfolio towards low-carbon companies, or, (iii), purchase so far neglected low-carbon bonds within the current eligibility and market neutrality framework. As all approaches have either very limited effects or are associated with significant theoretical and practical concerns, we conclude that their contribution to the success of active green monetary policy is not guaranteed, while at the same time risks arise for a monetary policy that targets price stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非常规绿色:参与与目标冲突之间的货币政策
摘要:我们研究了欧洲央行通过企业部门采购计划(CSPP)脱碳在支持向低碳经济转型方面的潜在作用。我们证明,CSPP购买的碳强度由三个主要因素决定:首先,由CSPP资格标准决定,因为这些标准倾向于排除低排放部门的债券。其次是债券市场的基本结构,因为债券市场往往向碳密集型行业倾斜。第三,在符合条件的债券中,欧洲央行倾向于选择那些来自相对排放密集型行业的债券。为了使CSPP脱碳,欧洲央行理论上可以按照以下三条路线采取行动:(i)调整CSPP资格标准,扩大合格低碳资产的范围;(ii)修改市场中立原则,使CSPP投资组合向低碳公司倾斜;(iii)在当前的资格和市场中立框架内购买迄今为止被忽视的低碳债券。由于所有的方法要么效果非常有限,要么与重大的理论和实践问题有关,我们得出的结论是,它们对积极绿色货币政策成功的贡献并不能得到保证,同时,以价格稳定为目标的货币政策也存在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Review of Economics and Statistics is a 100-year-old general journal of applied (especially quantitative) economics. Edited at the Harvard Kennedy School, the Review has published some of the most important articles in empirical economics.
期刊最新文献
Review of Economics and Statistics 2024 Annual Report Family-Leave Mandates and Female Labor at U.S. Firms: Evidence from a Trade Shock Regulatory Incentives for Innovation: The FDA's Breakthrough Therapy Designation The Unobserved Returns to Entrepreneurship Biometric Monitoring, Service Delivery and Misreporting: Evidence from Healthcare in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1