Wind Resource Assessment in Building Environment: Benchmarking of Numerical Approaches and Validation with Wind Tunnel Data

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Wind and Structures Pub Date : 2022-10-27 DOI:10.3390/wind2040035
Costa Paula, Cataldo José, Mazaira Leorlen, González Daniel, Costa Alexandre, Simões Teresa
{"title":"Wind Resource Assessment in Building Environment: Benchmarking of Numerical Approaches and Validation with Wind Tunnel Data","authors":"Costa Paula, Cataldo José, Mazaira Leorlen, González Daniel, Costa Alexandre, Simões Teresa","doi":"10.3390/wind2040035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the framework of the wind energy network for distributed generation in urban environments for most South American countries, wind resource assessment studies have been carried out in activities to establish a suitable methodology to assess the wind potential in urban environments. Some methodologies are already published in research studies, and the wind tunnel is the most accurate solution to obtain insight into the wind resource when measurements are unavailable, which is the most frequent case. Nevertheless, besides its validity, one cannot disregard the high cost of producing a scaled urban model and access to a wind tunnel. In this sense, this paper compares results from a wind tunnel experiment and different numerical modeling approaches. Two commercial models (WindSim and Wasp Engineering) and one open-source CFD code (OpenFOAM) are used. The results from the modeling simulation concluded that CFD models could achieve lower deviations for the mean wind speed and turbulence intensity when compared with non-CFD models. With such results, CFD modeling is a promising tool for reliably evaluating wind potential in urban environments.","PeriodicalId":51210,"journal":{"name":"Wind and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/wind2040035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the framework of the wind energy network for distributed generation in urban environments for most South American countries, wind resource assessment studies have been carried out in activities to establish a suitable methodology to assess the wind potential in urban environments. Some methodologies are already published in research studies, and the wind tunnel is the most accurate solution to obtain insight into the wind resource when measurements are unavailable, which is the most frequent case. Nevertheless, besides its validity, one cannot disregard the high cost of producing a scaled urban model and access to a wind tunnel. In this sense, this paper compares results from a wind tunnel experiment and different numerical modeling approaches. Two commercial models (WindSim and Wasp Engineering) and one open-source CFD code (OpenFOAM) are used. The results from the modeling simulation concluded that CFD models could achieve lower deviations for the mean wind speed and turbulence intensity when compared with non-CFD models. With such results, CFD modeling is a promising tool for reliably evaluating wind potential in urban environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑环境中的风资源评估:数值方法的标杆与风洞数据的验证
在大多数南美国家城市环境中分布式发电的风能网的框架内,已在活动中进行了风资源评价研究,以确定一种适当的方法来评价城市环境中的风力潜力。一些方法已经在研究中发表,风洞是最准确的解决方案,当无法获得测量时,这是最常见的情况。然而,除了它的有效性之外,人们不能忽视制作缩放城市模型和进入风洞的高成本。在这个意义上,本文比较了风洞实验和不同数值模拟方法的结果。使用两个商业模型(WindSim和Wasp Engineering)和一个开源CFD代码(OpenFOAM)。模拟结果表明,与非CFD模型相比,CFD模型对平均风速和湍流强度的偏差更小。有了这样的结果,CFD建模是一种很有前途的工具,可以可靠地评估城市环境中的风力潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wind and Structures
Wind and Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The WIND AND STRUCTURES, An International Journal, aims at: - Major publication channel for research in the general area of wind and structural engineering, - Wider distribution at more affordable subscription rates; - Faster reviewing and publication for manuscripts submitted. The main theme of the Journal is the wind effects on structures. Areas covered by the journal include: Wind loads and structural response, Bluff-body aerodynamics, Computational method, Wind tunnel modeling, Local wind environment, Codes and regulations, Wind effects on large scale structures.
期刊最新文献
Challenges and Perspectives of Wind Energy Technology Responses of a Modular Floating Wind TLP of MarsVAWT Supporting a 10 MW Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Wind Power Forecasting in a Semi-Arid Region Based on Machine Learning Error Correction Scaling Challenges for Conical Plain Bearings as Wind Turbine Main Bearings Numerical Modeling and Application of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine Arrays in Large Wind Farms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1