Meddling with Justice: Competitive Politics, Impunity, and Distrusted Courts in Post-Orange Ukraine

Q2 Social Sciences Demokratizatsiya Pub Date : 2010-05-01 DOI:10.3200/DEMO.18.2.122-147

Alexei Trochev

引用次数: 32

Abstract

Contrary to the theories of judicial empowerment that argue that the presence of strong political opposition is necessary for the development of an independent judiciary, the increasing fragmentation of power in today’s Ukraine goes hand-in-hand with judicial disempowerment - dependent courts regularly provide important benefits to rival elites.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

干涉司法:后橙色乌克兰的竞争政治、有罪不罚和不信任法院

司法授权理论认为，强大的政治反对派的存在对于司法独立的发展是必要的，与此相反，在今天的乌克兰，权力的日益分裂与司法权力的剥夺是密切相关的——依赖的法院经常为敌对的精英提供重要的利益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Demokratizatsiya Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Occupying a unique niche among literary journals, ANQ is filled with short, incisive research-based articles about the literature of the English-speaking world and the language of literature. Contributors unravel obscure allusions, explain sources and analogues, and supply variant manuscript readings. Also included are Old English word studies, textual emendations, and rare correspondence from neglected archives. The journal is an essential source for professors and students, as well as archivists, bibliographers, biographers, editors, lexicographers, and textual scholars. With subjects from Chaucer and Milton to Fitzgerald and Welty, ANQ delves into the heart of literature.

期刊最新文献

Authoritarian Modernization in Russia The Rise and Decline of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia Struggling for Citizenship: Civic participation and the State in Russia Meddling with Justice: Competitive Politics, Impunity, and Distrusted Courts in Post-Orange Ukraine The Molotov-Ribbentrop Commission and Claims of Post-Soviet Secessionist Territories to Sovereignty