"Pretty Close to a Must-Have": Balancing Usability Desire and Security Concern in Biometric Adoption

Flynn Wolf, Ravi Kuber, Adam J. Aviv
{"title":"\"Pretty Close to a Must-Have\": Balancing Usability Desire and Security Concern in Biometric Adoption","authors":"Flynn Wolf, Ravi Kuber, Adam J. Aviv","doi":"10.1145/3290605.3300381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report on a qualitative inquiry among security-expert and non-expert mobile device users about the adoption of biometric authentication using semi-structured interviews(n=38, 19/19 expert/non-expert). Security experts more readily adopted biometrics than non-experts but also harbored greater distrust towards its use for sensitive transactions,feared biometric signature compromise, and in some cases distrusted newer facial recognition methods. Both groups harbored misconceptions, such as misunderstanding of the functional role of biometrics in authentication, and were about equally likely to have stopped using biometrics due to usability. Implications include the need for tailored training for security-informed advocates, better design for device sharing and co-registration, and consideration for usability needs in work environments. Refinement of these features would remove perceived obstacles to ubiquitous computing among the growing population of mobile technology users sensitized to security risk.","PeriodicalId":20454,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

We report on a qualitative inquiry among security-expert and non-expert mobile device users about the adoption of biometric authentication using semi-structured interviews(n=38, 19/19 expert/non-expert). Security experts more readily adopted biometrics than non-experts but also harbored greater distrust towards its use for sensitive transactions,feared biometric signature compromise, and in some cases distrusted newer facial recognition methods. Both groups harbored misconceptions, such as misunderstanding of the functional role of biometrics in authentication, and were about equally likely to have stopped using biometrics due to usability. Implications include the need for tailored training for security-informed advocates, better design for device sharing and co-registration, and consideration for usability needs in work environments. Refinement of these features would remove perceived obstacles to ubiquitous computing among the growing population of mobile technology users sensitized to security risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“非常接近必备”:平衡生物识别技术应用中的可用性需求和安全问题
我们报告了在安全专家和非专家移动设备用户中使用半结构化访谈(n= 38,19 /19专家/非专家)进行的关于采用生物识别认证的定性调查。安全专家比非专家更容易采用生物识别技术,但也对将其用于敏感交易抱有更大的不信任,担心生物识别签名会被泄露,在某些情况下,还不信任新的面部识别方法。这两组人都有误解,例如对生物识别技术在身份验证中的功能作用的误解,并且由于可用性而停止使用生物识别技术的可能性大致相同。这意味着需要为安全知识倡导者提供量身定制的培训,更好地设计设备共享和共同注册,以及考虑工作环境中的可用性需求。在对安全风险敏感的不断增长的移动技术用户中,对这些特性的改进将消除对无处不在的计算的感知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HAExplorer Influencers in Multiplayer Online Shooters: Evidence of Social Contagion in Playtime and Social Play SeeingVR Trigger-Action Programming for Personalising Humanoid Robot Behaviour "Pretty Close to a Must-Have": Balancing Usability Desire and Security Concern in Biometric Adoption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1