The effect of gender on motivation towards science learning: A meta-analysis study

Baysal Emre, Fatma Mutlu, Oğuzhan Nacaroğlu
{"title":"The effect of gender on motivation towards science learning: A meta-analysis study","authors":"Baysal Emre, Fatma Mutlu, Oğuzhan Nacaroğlu","doi":"10.5937/istrped2301001b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine the effect size of gender on motivation towards science learning by combining the results of studies, which were conducted to determine the effect of gender on motivation towards science learning, via the meta-analysis method. In this context, master's thesis, doctoral dissertations, and articles, which were conducted between 2010 and 2020, were suitable for the research problem, and had statistical data to be included in the meta-analysis study, were reviewed and examined in Turkish and English from national and international databases. As a result of the literature review, 2435 national and international studies were collected. Forty-nine studies, containing data suitable for coding protocol in accordance with the criteria determined by the researchers, were included in the meta-analysis. The sample size of 20.862 participants was obtained in the study (10.446 females and 10.416 males). The effect sizes and the combined effect sizes of the studies were calculated using \"Comprehensive Meta-Analysis v 2.0 (CMA).\" In the studies using the random effects model, the effect size of the gender variable on motivation towards science learning was determined to be 0.155 (95% CI, SE = 0.040). This value showed that the overall effect of the gender variable on motivation towards science learning was at an \"insignificant\" level in favor of the women. The results of the anova similarity analysis performed for the categorical moderators of publication type, scale type, and education level indicated that these moderators did not cause any statistically significant difference in the effect sizes. As a result of the meta-regression analysis performed for the publication year moderator - which was evaluated as a continuous variable - this moderator did not make any significant difference on the effect sizes of motivation towards science learning.","PeriodicalId":32439,"journal":{"name":"Research in English Language Pedagogy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in English Language Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2301001b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect size of gender on motivation towards science learning by combining the results of studies, which were conducted to determine the effect of gender on motivation towards science learning, via the meta-analysis method. In this context, master's thesis, doctoral dissertations, and articles, which were conducted between 2010 and 2020, were suitable for the research problem, and had statistical data to be included in the meta-analysis study, were reviewed and examined in Turkish and English from national and international databases. As a result of the literature review, 2435 national and international studies were collected. Forty-nine studies, containing data suitable for coding protocol in accordance with the criteria determined by the researchers, were included in the meta-analysis. The sample size of 20.862 participants was obtained in the study (10.446 females and 10.416 males). The effect sizes and the combined effect sizes of the studies were calculated using "Comprehensive Meta-Analysis v 2.0 (CMA)." In the studies using the random effects model, the effect size of the gender variable on motivation towards science learning was determined to be 0.155 (95% CI, SE = 0.040). This value showed that the overall effect of the gender variable on motivation towards science learning was at an "insignificant" level in favor of the women. The results of the anova similarity analysis performed for the categorical moderators of publication type, scale type, and education level indicated that these moderators did not cause any statistically significant difference in the effect sizes. As a result of the meta-regression analysis performed for the publication year moderator - which was evaluated as a continuous variable - this moderator did not make any significant difference on the effect sizes of motivation towards science learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别对科学学习动机的影响:一项元分析研究
本研究的目的是通过荟萃分析方法,结合性别对科学学习动机影响的研究结果,确定性别对科学学习动机的影响大小。在此背景下,2010年至2020年期间发表的硕士论文、博士论文和文章适合研究问题,并有统计数据纳入meta分析研究,并从国家和国际数据库中以土耳其语和英语进行了审查和检查。作为文献综述的结果,我们收集了2435项国内和国际研究。49项研究纳入meta分析,这些研究的数据符合研究人员确定的标准,适合编码方案。本研究共获得20.862人的样本量(女性10.446人,男性10.416人)。使用“综合Meta-Analysis v 2.0 (CMA)”计算研究的效应量和综合效应量。在使用随机效应模型的研究中,性别变量对科学学习动机的效应量被确定为0.155 (95% CI, SE = 0.040)。该值表明,性别变量对科学学习动机的总体影响处于有利于女性的“微不足道”水平。对出版类型、量表类型和教育水平的分类调节因子进行方差相似分析的结果表明,这些调节因子在效应量上没有引起统计学上显著的差异。作为对出版年份调节因子进行meta回归分析的结果——它被评估为一个连续变量——该调节因子对科学学习动机的效应大小没有任何显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of gender on motivation towards science learning: A meta-analysis study Digital literacy of teachers for using electronic textbooks in the teaching class of nature and society Student perceptions of values and limitations of distance teaching during the pandemic of COVID-19 Strukturisanje pravougaonika kod učenika mlađeg školskog uzrasta Uključenost roditelja u život i rad škole
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1