{"title":"Diskursus Islam Nusantara dalam Representasi Media Massa","authors":"M. Fahmi","doi":"10.15642/JKI.2017.7.1.22-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to look at how the representation of the Islam Nusantara in the national media in Indonesia, namely Kompas and Republika. The method used in this study is critical discourse analysis, Theo van Leeuwen, which focuses on how actors are represented in media texts both in the inclusion and the exclusion strategies. This study concludes that, first, Kompas tends to support the Islamic discourse of Nusantara, while Republika tend to reject the discourse. Further, Kompas represents the ideology of pluralism and nationalism, whilts Republika tends to present a contestation between the pros and cons of Islam Nusantara. Those who disagree with Islam Nusantara more represent the ideology of scrituralism, whilst those who pros of it tend to reflect traditionalist ideology.","PeriodicalId":31785,"journal":{"name":"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/JKI.2017.7.1.22-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This study aims to look at how the representation of the Islam Nusantara in the national media in Indonesia, namely Kompas and Republika. The method used in this study is critical discourse analysis, Theo van Leeuwen, which focuses on how actors are represented in media texts both in the inclusion and the exclusion strategies. This study concludes that, first, Kompas tends to support the Islamic discourse of Nusantara, while Republika tend to reject the discourse. Further, Kompas represents the ideology of pluralism and nationalism, whilts Republika tends to present a contestation between the pros and cons of Islam Nusantara. Those who disagree with Islam Nusantara more represent the ideology of scrituralism, whilst those who pros of it tend to reflect traditionalist ideology.
本研究旨在探讨伊斯兰努桑塔拉在印尼国家媒体(即Kompas和Republika)中的代表性。本研究使用的方法是西奥·范·莱文(Theo van Leeuwen)的批判性话语分析方法,主要研究演员在媒体文本中的包容和排斥策略。本研究的结论是,首先,Kompas倾向于支持努沙塔拉的伊斯兰话语,而共和倾向于拒绝该话语。此外,《Kompas》代表了多元主义和民族主义的意识形态,而《republicka》则倾向于呈现伊斯兰努桑塔拉的正反之争。那些不同意伊斯兰努桑塔拉的人更多地代表了经书主义的意识形态,而那些支持它的人则倾向于反映传统主义的意识形态。