A Novel Workflow for Oil Production Forecasting using Ensemble-Based Decline Curve Analysis

Siavash Hakim Elahi
{"title":"A Novel Workflow for Oil Production Forecasting using Ensemble-Based Decline Curve Analysis","authors":"Siavash Hakim Elahi","doi":"10.2118/195916-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the absence of well-developed calibrated geologic and simulation models, empirical approaches such as decline curve analysis (DCA) are normally used for production forecasting and reserve estimation. DCA is computationally more efficient compared to simulation models when the active well base exceeds hundreds of wells. However, the underlying assumption for conventional DCA is no change in well operation settings. Moreover, the common approach for production forecasting consists of manual outlier detection and removal, interpretation of missing measurements and data fitting using different models for each well. Therefore, the process of conventional DCA is subjective due to the lack of a standard workflow for preprocessing and data cleansing. The common practice for doing DCA has three main steps: 1. Finding the most representative period in the history of well, 2. Detecting the initial rate (start point) of forecast, 3. Selecting the type of decline and fitting the appropriate model to data points. The solutions to these problems could vary from engineer to engineer and it can be time consuming to analyze all wells manually. To address these issues, we developed a novel workflow based on stochastic methods for detecting various well interventions including change in artificial lift, pump changes and acid treatment, and for forecasting oil production rate more accurately in the presence of uncertainty. The novelty of the proposed ensemble-based approach is forecasting conditioned on various well interventions. Furthermore, the proposed unsupervised stochastic anomaly detection method will detect various well works (or events) in the case of missing records of time and type of events. In this paper, we designed two experiments to test the proposed workflow for oil production rate forecasting and evaluation of acid treatments.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"199 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195916-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the absence of well-developed calibrated geologic and simulation models, empirical approaches such as decline curve analysis (DCA) are normally used for production forecasting and reserve estimation. DCA is computationally more efficient compared to simulation models when the active well base exceeds hundreds of wells. However, the underlying assumption for conventional DCA is no change in well operation settings. Moreover, the common approach for production forecasting consists of manual outlier detection and removal, interpretation of missing measurements and data fitting using different models for each well. Therefore, the process of conventional DCA is subjective due to the lack of a standard workflow for preprocessing and data cleansing. The common practice for doing DCA has three main steps: 1. Finding the most representative period in the history of well, 2. Detecting the initial rate (start point) of forecast, 3. Selecting the type of decline and fitting the appropriate model to data points. The solutions to these problems could vary from engineer to engineer and it can be time consuming to analyze all wells manually. To address these issues, we developed a novel workflow based on stochastic methods for detecting various well interventions including change in artificial lift, pump changes and acid treatment, and for forecasting oil production rate more accurately in the presence of uncertainty. The novelty of the proposed ensemble-based approach is forecasting conditioned on various well interventions. Furthermore, the proposed unsupervised stochastic anomaly detection method will detect various well works (or events) in the case of missing records of time and type of events. In this paper, we designed two experiments to test the proposed workflow for oil production rate forecasting and evaluation of acid treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于集成递减曲线分析的石油产量预测新工作流程
在缺乏成熟的校准地质和模拟模型的情况下,通常采用递减曲线分析(DCA)等经验方法进行产量预测和储量估计。当活跃井群超过数百口井时,与模拟模型相比,DCA的计算效率更高。然而,传统DCA的基本假设是井的操作环境没有变化。此外,产量预测的常用方法包括人工异常值检测和去除、对缺失测量数据的解释以及对每口井使用不同模型的数据拟合。因此,由于缺乏标准的预处理和数据清理工作流程,传统的DCA过程是主观的。执行DCA的常见做法有三个主要步骤:1。找到历史上最具代表性的时期井,2。检测预测的初始速率(起始点);选择下降的类型并将适当的模型拟合到数据点。这些问题的解决方案可能因工程师而异,而且手动分析所有井可能非常耗时。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一种基于随机方法的新工作流程,用于检测各种井干预措施,包括人工举升、泵更换和酸处理的变化,并在存在不确定性的情况下更准确地预测产油量。该方法的新颖之处在于,它可以根据不同的油井干预进行预测。此外,所提出的无监督随机异常检测方法将在缺少时间和事件类型记录的情况下检测各种井工程(或事件)。在本文中,我们设计了两个实验来测试所提出的产油速度预测和酸处理评价工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification of Autonomous Inflow Control Valve Flow Performance Within Heavy Oil-SAGD Thermal Flow Loop Reactive vs Proactive Intelligent Well Injection Evaluation for EOR in a Stratified GOM Deepwater Wilcox Reservoir using Integrated Simulation-Surface Network Modeling A Novel Workflow for Oil Production Forecasting using Ensemble-Based Decline Curve Analysis An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict the Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoir Rocks Characterization of Organic Pores within High-Maturation Shale Gas Reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1