Can Neural Networks Enhance Physics Simulations?

Cristian Avatavului, R. Ifrim, Mihai Voncila
{"title":"Can Neural Networks Enhance Physics Simulations?","authors":"Cristian Avatavului, R. Ifrim, Mihai Voncila","doi":"10.18662/brain/14.2/445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of this research manuscript is to design, develop, and evaluate an artificial neural network architecture that is capable of emulating and predicting the dynamic interaction patterns manifested during the encounter between two distinct entities. This endeavor is primarily centered around computational learning and understanding of the associated physical impulses that emerge when these objects engage in contact, elucidating the complex physical interplays therein. This process incorporates the strategic use of an extant physics engine to generate the requisite training datasets, thereby providing a robust and comprehensive foundation for neural network training and subsequent performance evaluation. In order to scrutinize and substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed artificial neural network model, this investigation also embarks on a rigorous comparative analysis. The principal focus of this comparison is to juxtapose the results rendered by the trained neural network vis-a-vis those produced by the original physics engine. The goal here is to gauge the precision, reliability, and practicality of the trained model in accurately predicting the physical impulses, thereby demonstrating its potential to stand as a feasible alternative to the traditional physics engine. Despite the initial success of this endeavor, it is worth noting that the proposed neural network system managed to achieve a range of prediction rates, oscillating between 60% and 91%, contingent upon the specific test scenario. While these preliminary results are promising, they elucidate the necessity for further optimization and refinement to bolster the model's performance and prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":44081,"journal":{"name":"BRAIN-Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BRAIN-Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.2/445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this research manuscript is to design, develop, and evaluate an artificial neural network architecture that is capable of emulating and predicting the dynamic interaction patterns manifested during the encounter between two distinct entities. This endeavor is primarily centered around computational learning and understanding of the associated physical impulses that emerge when these objects engage in contact, elucidating the complex physical interplays therein. This process incorporates the strategic use of an extant physics engine to generate the requisite training datasets, thereby providing a robust and comprehensive foundation for neural network training and subsequent performance evaluation. In order to scrutinize and substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed artificial neural network model, this investigation also embarks on a rigorous comparative analysis. The principal focus of this comparison is to juxtapose the results rendered by the trained neural network vis-a-vis those produced by the original physics engine. The goal here is to gauge the precision, reliability, and practicality of the trained model in accurately predicting the physical impulses, thereby demonstrating its potential to stand as a feasible alternative to the traditional physics engine. Despite the initial success of this endeavor, it is worth noting that the proposed neural network system managed to achieve a range of prediction rates, oscillating between 60% and 91%, contingent upon the specific test scenario. While these preliminary results are promising, they elucidate the necessity for further optimization and refinement to bolster the model's performance and prediction accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经网络能增强物理模拟吗?
本研究手稿的主要目标是设计、开发和评估一个人工神经网络架构,该架构能够模拟和预测两个不同实体之间相遇时表现出的动态交互模式。这一努力主要集中在计算学习和理解当这些物体接触时出现的相关物理脉冲,阐明其中复杂的物理相互作用。这个过程结合了现有物理引擎的战略使用来生成必要的训练数据集,从而为神经网络训练和随后的性能评估提供了一个强大而全面的基础。为了检验和证实所提出的人工神经网络模型的有效性,本研究还进行了严格的比较分析。这种比较的主要焦点是将经过训练的神经网络呈现的结果与原始物理引擎产生的结果并列。这里的目标是衡量训练模型在准确预测物理脉冲方面的精度、可靠性和实用性,从而展示其作为传统物理引擎的可行替代方案的潜力。尽管这项努力取得了初步的成功,但值得注意的是,所提出的神经网络系统设法实现了一系列的预测率,在60%到91%之间波动,这取决于具体的测试场景。虽然这些初步结果很有希望,但它们阐明了进一步优化和改进以提高模型性能和预测精度的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
47.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychological Complications During Military Operations in Ukraine: Neurobiological Effects Results of the Implementation of a Comprehensive Socio-Psychological Program to Foster Professional Empathy Among Professionals in the Helping Professions Can Neural Networks Enhance Physics Simulations? National Strategy of Information Society in the Realities of Ukraine Document Image Binarization Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1