The Changing Management of Esophageal Carcinoma: Survival in a Population Cohort 1985-1994

T. Bates, A. Antoniou, R. Marshall, M. Harrison, E. Bassett
{"title":"The Changing Management of Esophageal Carcinoma: Survival in a Population Cohort 1985-1994","authors":"T. Bates, A. Antoniou, R. Marshall, M. Harrison, E. Bassett","doi":"10.2174/1874189400802010044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The management of esophageal carcinoma is changing but before the introduction of chemotherapy and multidisciplinary teams, surgery became more selective. The aim of this study was to confirm this trend and to examine survival in a total population cohort 1985-94. Results: Only a quarter of 413 patients had surgery but from 1989 even fewer were operated on but there were more long- term survivors: 1/51 v. 7/58 (p<0.05). Operative mortality fell from 12% to 6.9 % in the later period (N.S.) and survival post surgery was marginally improved, 15 v. 11 months p = 0.0502. The five year survival rate doubled from 7.8% to 17.2%. Conclusion: Few studies of esophageal cancer include all cases in a defined population. This carries a very poor prognosis but the present cohort shows a slight improvement with more selective surgery and this may serve as a benchmark against which modern multidisciplinary management might be compared.","PeriodicalId":87833,"journal":{"name":"The open clinical cancer journal","volume":"101 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open clinical cancer journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874189400802010044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of esophageal carcinoma is changing but before the introduction of chemotherapy and multidisciplinary teams, surgery became more selective. The aim of this study was to confirm this trend and to examine survival in a total population cohort 1985-94. Results: Only a quarter of 413 patients had surgery but from 1989 even fewer were operated on but there were more long- term survivors: 1/51 v. 7/58 (p<0.05). Operative mortality fell from 12% to 6.9 % in the later period (N.S.) and survival post surgery was marginally improved, 15 v. 11 months p = 0.0502. The five year survival rate doubled from 7.8% to 17.2%. Conclusion: Few studies of esophageal cancer include all cases in a defined population. This carries a very poor prognosis but the present cohort shows a slight improvement with more selective surgery and this may serve as a benchmark against which modern multidisciplinary management might be compared.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管癌治疗方法的改变:1985-1994年人群队列的生存率
背景:食管癌的治疗正在发生变化,但在引入化疗和多学科团队之前,手术变得更具选择性。本研究的目的是确认这一趋势,并检查1985- 1994年总人口队列的生存率。结果:413例患者中只有1/ 4的患者接受了手术治疗,而1989年以来,接受手术治疗的患者更少,但长期存活的患者较多:1/51 vs 7/58 (p<0.05)。术后死亡率从12%下降到6.9% (N.S.),术后生存率略有提高,15 vs 11个月p = 0.0502。5年生存率从7.8%增加到17.2%。结论:很少有食管癌的研究包括特定人群中的所有病例。这种情况预后很差,但目前的队列显示,通过更多的选择性手术,情况略有改善,这可以作为比较现代多学科管理的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human Papillomavirus Integration and its Role in Cervical Malignant Progression Psoas Abscess after Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Oral Mucositis, Pain and Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer who Received Chemoradiotherapy with or without Cetuximab Rare Tumors: An Appeal for Justice Redox Status and Ascorbic Acid in Carcinoma of Head and Neck is Correlated to Clinical Response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1