Oral Mucositis, Pain and Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer who Received Chemoradiotherapy with or without Cetuximab

O. Nicolatou‐Galitis, T. Sarri, K. Dardoufas, V. Kouloulias, Xenophon Vakalis, A. Polychronopoulou, D. Demenagas, A. Sotiropoulou-Lontou
{"title":"Oral Mucositis, Pain and Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer who Received Chemoradiotherapy with or without Cetuximab","authors":"O. Nicolatou‐Galitis, T. Sarri, K. Dardoufas, V. Kouloulias, Xenophon Vakalis, A. Polychronopoulou, D. Demenagas, A. Sotiropoulou-Lontou","doi":"10.2174/1874189401004010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal of work: To compare the severity of oral mucositis, pain and xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients, who received radiotherapy with cisplatin and cetuximab to that of patients who received radiotherapy with cisplatin alone. Patients: Forty-nine head and neck cancer patients entered the study. Twenty-five patients (Group A) received radiotherapy and cisplatin. Twenty-four patients (Group B) received radiotherapy, cisplatin, and cetuximab. Methods: Oral mucositis was recorded weekly, according to EORTC/RTOG criteria. Pain and xerostomia were assessed using a 10cm visual analogue scale. Antifungal and antiviral treatment and prophylaxis were administered during RT to both groups. Results: During chemoradiotherapy, severe mucositis, pain and xerostomia were observed in 60%, 64% and 52% respectively in Group A, while the same symptoms were observed in 79%, 58% and 29% respectively in Group B. The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. At the end of chemoradiotherapy, severe mucositis, pain and xerostomia were recorded in 24%, 32% and 32% in Group A and 37%, 21% and 17% respectively in Group B. The differences between the two groups were, again, statistically not significant. Neither significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to the use of antifungal and antiviral treatment, radiotherapy interruptions and weight loss. In both groups, oral mucositis, pain and xerostomia were significantly reduced at the end of radiotherapy as compared to those during RT, following the anti-infectious treatment and prophylaxis. Conclusion: Cetuximab, added to cisplatin/radiotherapy, did not increase the severity of oral mucositis, pain and xerostomia, in head and neck cancer patients, with limitations of the study design and its limited number of patients.","PeriodicalId":87833,"journal":{"name":"The open clinical cancer journal","volume":"20 77 1","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open clinical cancer journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874189401004010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Goal of work: To compare the severity of oral mucositis, pain and xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients, who received radiotherapy with cisplatin and cetuximab to that of patients who received radiotherapy with cisplatin alone. Patients: Forty-nine head and neck cancer patients entered the study. Twenty-five patients (Group A) received radiotherapy and cisplatin. Twenty-four patients (Group B) received radiotherapy, cisplatin, and cetuximab. Methods: Oral mucositis was recorded weekly, according to EORTC/RTOG criteria. Pain and xerostomia were assessed using a 10cm visual analogue scale. Antifungal and antiviral treatment and prophylaxis were administered during RT to both groups. Results: During chemoradiotherapy, severe mucositis, pain and xerostomia were observed in 60%, 64% and 52% respectively in Group A, while the same symptoms were observed in 79%, 58% and 29% respectively in Group B. The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. At the end of chemoradiotherapy, severe mucositis, pain and xerostomia were recorded in 24%, 32% and 32% in Group A and 37%, 21% and 17% respectively in Group B. The differences between the two groups were, again, statistically not significant. Neither significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to the use of antifungal and antiviral treatment, radiotherapy interruptions and weight loss. In both groups, oral mucositis, pain and xerostomia were significantly reduced at the end of radiotherapy as compared to those during RT, following the anti-infectious treatment and prophylaxis. Conclusion: Cetuximab, added to cisplatin/radiotherapy, did not increase the severity of oral mucositis, pain and xerostomia, in head and neck cancer patients, with limitations of the study design and its limited number of patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受西妥昔单抗或不含西妥昔单抗放化疗的头颈癌患者的口腔黏膜炎、疼痛和口干
工作目的:比较顺铂联合西妥昔单抗放疗与单用顺铂放疗的头颈癌患者口腔黏膜炎、疼痛、口干的严重程度。患者:49名头颈癌患者进入研究。25例患者(A组)接受放疗和顺铂治疗。24例患者(B组)接受放疗、顺铂和西妥昔单抗治疗。方法:按EORTC/RTOG标准每周记录口腔黏膜炎。采用10cm视觉模拟量表评估疼痛和口干。两组均在RT期间给予抗真菌和抗病毒治疗和预防。结果:放化疗期间,A组出现严重黏膜炎、疼痛、口干的比例分别为60%、64%、52%,b组出现严重黏膜炎、疼痛、口干的比例分别为79%、58%、29%,两组比较差异无统计学意义。放化疗结束时,A组严重黏膜炎、疼痛、口干发生率分别为24%、32%、32%,b组分别为37%、21%、17%,两组差异均无统计学意义。在抗真菌和抗病毒治疗的使用、放疗中断和体重减轻方面,两组之间没有发现显著差异。两组患者在接受抗感染治疗和预防后,放疗结束时口腔黏膜炎、疼痛和口干较放疗期间明显减少。结论:在顺铂/放疗的基础上加用西妥昔单抗不会增加头颈癌患者口腔黏膜炎、疼痛和口干的严重程度,存在研究设计的局限性和患者数量的有限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human Papillomavirus Integration and its Role in Cervical Malignant Progression Psoas Abscess after Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Oral Mucositis, Pain and Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer who Received Chemoradiotherapy with or without Cetuximab Rare Tumors: An Appeal for Justice Redox Status and Ascorbic Acid in Carcinoma of Head and Neck is Correlated to Clinical Response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1