Rare Tumors: An Appeal for Justice

E. Bloustein
{"title":"Rare Tumors: An Appeal for Justice","authors":"E. Bloustein","doi":"10.2174/1874189401004010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While cancers with 40,000 or fewer diagnoses a year are considered rare, they make up about 25% of cancer mortalities. Despite this, rare cancers remain largely ignored by investigators because of insufficient research funding. Their neglect has been justified in the belief that a focus on common tumors will yield benefits for all tumors, including rare tumors. This however has not happened. One solution proposed to address this problem is to mobilize those diagnosed with rare tumors to advocate for research in rare tumors. But is it fair to place a burden of self-advocacy on some cancer patients but not on others? A better solution, proposed here, invokes a theory of justice developed by John Rawls, and offers an alternative statement of the ethical basis for involving human subjects in research and suggestions for restructuring the cancer research enterprise itself.","PeriodicalId":87833,"journal":{"name":"The open clinical cancer journal","volume":"5 4 1","pages":"3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open clinical cancer journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874189401004010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While cancers with 40,000 or fewer diagnoses a year are considered rare, they make up about 25% of cancer mortalities. Despite this, rare cancers remain largely ignored by investigators because of insufficient research funding. Their neglect has been justified in the belief that a focus on common tumors will yield benefits for all tumors, including rare tumors. This however has not happened. One solution proposed to address this problem is to mobilize those diagnosed with rare tumors to advocate for research in rare tumors. But is it fair to place a burden of self-advocacy on some cancer patients but not on others? A better solution, proposed here, invokes a theory of justice developed by John Rawls, and offers an alternative statement of the ethical basis for involving human subjects in research and suggestions for restructuring the cancer research enterprise itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罕见肿瘤:对正义的呼吁
虽然每年确诊人数少于4万的癌症被认为是罕见的,但它们占癌症死亡人数的25%左右。尽管如此,由于研究经费不足,研究人员在很大程度上仍然忽视了罕见癌症。他们的忽视是合理的,因为他们相信,对常见肿瘤的关注将对所有肿瘤,包括罕见肿瘤产生益处。然而,这并没有发生。针对这一问题的一个解决方案是动员那些被诊断患有罕见肿瘤的人来倡导对罕见肿瘤的研究。但是,把自我辩护的重担放在一些癌症患者身上,而不是其他人身上,这公平吗?这里提出了一个更好的解决方案,它援引了约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)提出的正义理论,并提供了另一种关于将人类受试者纳入研究的伦理基础的声明,以及重组癌症研究事业本身的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human Papillomavirus Integration and its Role in Cervical Malignant Progression Psoas Abscess after Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Oral Mucositis, Pain and Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer who Received Chemoradiotherapy with or without Cetuximab Rare Tumors: An Appeal for Justice Redox Status and Ascorbic Acid in Carcinoma of Head and Neck is Correlated to Clinical Response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1