Misconception Analysis: A Necessary Complement to Investigated the Causes of Students’ Misconception in Conducting Research and Development

E. J. Wicaksana, Aprizal Lukman, Jodion Siburian
{"title":"Misconception Analysis: A Necessary Complement to Investigated the Causes of Students’ Misconception in Conducting Research and Development","authors":"E. J. Wicaksana, Aprizal Lukman, Jodion Siburian","doi":"10.15294/usej.v10i1.42719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the need for the development of learning books in the form of research and development (R&D) model books to deal with student misconceptions in final project writing. This study analyzes student needs so that practical actions can be found in the early stages of developing research books. The development of R&D books that is carried out is expected to be able to deal with student misconceptions. Errors in understanding R&D are often experienced by students in the mentoring process which emphasizes the end result rather than the development process. The proposed solution is to use misconseption analysis (MA). This type of research is research and development or R&D (research and development) which refers to the ADDIE model with data analysis techniques using descriptive statistics. This stage is the initial stage of ADDIE, namely analysis. Data were obtained from 11 student respondents from a university consisting of three men and eight women. Based on the data collected, the results of student assumptions in understanding development research are not in accordance with actual understanding. The assumption data for students’ understanding of R&D development is 18.18% very understanding, 27.27% understanding, 36.36% quite understanding, 18.18% do not understand. 0.00% don’t understand. Whereas in fact the understanding of students in R&D development is 0.00% very understanding, 9.09% understands, 27.27% understands quite well, 36.36% does not understand, and 27.27% does not understand. The majority of students in research using the R&D method experience misconceptions. The concept that they believed was correct, it turned out that after being studied there were several mistakes or misunderstandings. Students do not get the main source of input in the mentoring process. The misconception is also caused by the fact that in writing a thesis, students have not received references that are studied in depth about the development model.","PeriodicalId":30735,"journal":{"name":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v10i1.42719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the need for the development of learning books in the form of research and development (R&D) model books to deal with student misconceptions in final project writing. This study analyzes student needs so that practical actions can be found in the early stages of developing research books. The development of R&D books that is carried out is expected to be able to deal with student misconceptions. Errors in understanding R&D are often experienced by students in the mentoring process which emphasizes the end result rather than the development process. The proposed solution is to use misconseption analysis (MA). This type of research is research and development or R&D (research and development) which refers to the ADDIE model with data analysis techniques using descriptive statistics. This stage is the initial stage of ADDIE, namely analysis. Data were obtained from 11 student respondents from a university consisting of three men and eight women. Based on the data collected, the results of student assumptions in understanding development research are not in accordance with actual understanding. The assumption data for students’ understanding of R&D development is 18.18% very understanding, 27.27% understanding, 36.36% quite understanding, 18.18% do not understand. 0.00% don’t understand. Whereas in fact the understanding of students in R&D development is 0.00% very understanding, 9.09% understands, 27.27% understands quite well, 36.36% does not understand, and 27.27% does not understand. The majority of students in research using the R&D method experience misconceptions. The concept that they believed was correct, it turned out that after being studied there were several mistakes or misunderstandings. Students do not get the main source of input in the mentoring process. The misconception is also caused by the fact that in writing a thesis, students have not received references that are studied in depth about the development model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
误解分析:对研究开发中学生误解原因调查的必要补充
本研究旨在分析以研发(R&D)模式书的形式开发学习性书籍的必要性,以解决学生在期末专题写作中的误解。本研究分析学生的需求,以便在开发研究性书籍的早期阶段找到实际行动。正在进行的研发书籍的开发希望能够解决学生的误解。在指导过程中,学生往往会经历对研发的错误理解,因为指导强调的是最终结果,而不是发展过程。建议的解决方案是使用误解分析(MA)。这种类型的研究是研究和发展或R&D(研究和发展),指的是使用描述性统计数据分析技术的ADDIE模型。这个阶段是ADDIE的初始阶段,即分析。数据来自一所大学的11名学生,其中3男8女。根据收集的数据,学生在理解发展研究中的假设结果与实际理解不一致。学生对研发发展理解的假设数据为:非常理解18.18%,理解27.27%,相当理解36.36%,不理解18.18%。0.00%的人不明白。而实际上学生对R&D发展的理解是0.00%非常理解,9.09%理解,27.27%理解得相当好,36.36%不理解,27.27%不理解。使用研发方法进行研究的大多数学生都有误解。他们认为是正确的概念,经过研究发现有几个错误或误解。在指导过程中,学生并不是输入的主要来源。造成这种误解的另一个原因是,学生在写论文时,没有收到关于发展模式的深入研究的参考文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Views and Experiences of Pre-Service Science Teachers on the Use of Technology in Teaching and Learning of Electric Concepts Promoting Students' Science Process Skills Through Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain Implementation Study of Local Wisdom Nyadran Sruwen Hamlet as Ethnoscience and Environmental Ethics Science Around Us: Development of a Community-based Science Curriculum for Local Preschools in the Philippines Comparative Effect of use of Graphic Organizers on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Organic Chemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1