Comparative Effect of use of Graphic Organizers on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Organic Chemistry

Bashirat Titilope Imam, A. S. Olorundare
{"title":"Comparative Effect of use of Graphic Organizers on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Organic Chemistry","authors":"Bashirat Titilope Imam, A. S. Olorundare","doi":"10.15294/usej.v12i1.55511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of the use of concept map and mind map graphic organizers on students’ learning outcomes in organic chemistry. This research adopted a quasi-experimental design involving a 3X2 pre-test post-test non-randomized and non-equivalent control group design. The study is premised on the dual coding theory of cognition, and involved 183 respondents whom were purposively selected from three intact classes. Data for the study was gathered through an organic chemistry achievement test whose reliability was determined through a test retest method and a reliability index of 0.74 was obtained. Data was analyzed using t-test and Analysis of Covariance. Findings show that there was a significant difference between the achievement of students taught organic chemistry using concept map graphic organizers and those taught with the mind map graphic organizer (F(1,118)= 7.04, p<.05). Using t-test statistics, findings also indicated that there was no significant difference in the achievement of male and female students when exposed to either concept map (t(75)= .47, p = .63) or mind map graphic organizer (t(42)= .64, p = .52). Hence, it was concluded that mind map is a more effective tool for learning organic chemistry when compared to the concept map. Irrespective of students’ gender, either of concept map or a mind map can help improve students’ achievement in organic chemistry.","PeriodicalId":30735,"journal":{"name":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","volume":"487 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v12i1.55511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of the use of concept map and mind map graphic organizers on students’ learning outcomes in organic chemistry. This research adopted a quasi-experimental design involving a 3X2 pre-test post-test non-randomized and non-equivalent control group design. The study is premised on the dual coding theory of cognition, and involved 183 respondents whom were purposively selected from three intact classes. Data for the study was gathered through an organic chemistry achievement test whose reliability was determined through a test retest method and a reliability index of 0.74 was obtained. Data was analyzed using t-test and Analysis of Covariance. Findings show that there was a significant difference between the achievement of students taught organic chemistry using concept map graphic organizers and those taught with the mind map graphic organizer (F(1,118)= 7.04, p<.05). Using t-test statistics, findings also indicated that there was no significant difference in the achievement of male and female students when exposed to either concept map (t(75)= .47, p = .63) or mind map graphic organizer (t(42)= .64, p = .52). Hence, it was concluded that mind map is a more effective tool for learning organic chemistry when compared to the concept map. Irrespective of students’ gender, either of concept map or a mind map can help improve students’ achievement in organic chemistry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机化学教学中图形组织对学生学习效果的影响
本研究的目的是确定使用概念图和思维导图组织者对学生有机化学学习成果的比较有效性。本研究采用准实验设计,采用3X2前测后测非随机非等效对照组设计。本研究以认知的双重编码理论为前提,从三个完整的班级中有意选择了183名被调查者。本研究的数据通过有机化学成就测试收集,通过测试重测法确定其信度,得到信度指数为0.74。数据分析采用t检验和协方差分析。结果表明,使用概念图组织方式教学的学生与使用思维导图组织方式教学的学生在有机化学教学成绩上存在显著差异(F(1,118)= 7.04, p< 0.05)。使用t检验统计数据,研究结果还表明,当暴露于概念图(t(75)= .47, p = .63)或思维导图组织者(t(42)= .64, p = .52)时,男女学生的成绩没有显著差异。因此,与概念图相比,思维导图是一种更有效的有机化学学习工具。无论学生的性别如何,概念图或思维导图都有助于提高学生在有机化学方面的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Views and Experiences of Pre-Service Science Teachers on the Use of Technology in Teaching and Learning of Electric Concepts Promoting Students' Science Process Skills Through Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain Implementation Study of Local Wisdom Nyadran Sruwen Hamlet as Ethnoscience and Environmental Ethics Science Around Us: Development of a Community-based Science Curriculum for Local Preschools in the Philippines Comparative Effect of use of Graphic Organizers on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Organic Chemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1