The Changing Vocabulary of Literature: On the Migration and Transformation of Literary Concepts in Europe (1900–1950) – an Introduction

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE ARCADIA Pub Date : 2015-11-01 DOI:10.1515/arcadia-2015-0019
P. Verstraeten, Bart Van den Bossche
{"title":"The Changing Vocabulary of Literature: On the Migration and Transformation of Literary Concepts in Europe (1900–1950) – an Introduction","authors":"P. Verstraeten, Bart Van den Bossche","doi":"10.1515/arcadia-2015-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The central premise of the series of essays presented here is that a full understanding of the wide range of factors in literary change should take into account and carefully analyze the interaction between transformations of literary repertoires on the one hand and contemporary conceptual meta-languages on the other. Therefore, each essay offers a comprehensive reflection on a set of terms or concepts that played a key role in literary discourse in the first half of the 20th century. Our initial list included notions such as rhetoric, revolution, image, poesie pure, abstraction, nobility, Kulturpessimismus, middlebrow, life, the organic, group, ecriture automatique, international, technique. Some of these are new coinages, specifically conceived to describe new literary phenomena, yet most are general notions with long histories, firmly rooted in everyday language and relevant to very diverse cultural and social domains. Nevertheless, our primary aim was to map the specific meanings these terms acquired in the literary field between roughly 1900 and 1950; precisely the fact that they are so broad and deeply rooted that makes them interesting cases for the re-articulation of literary vocabularies. The focus is on how these concepts function as building blocks within broader meta-literary discourses that try to describe, interpret, and evaluate phenomena of change in the period that is usually associated with modernist literature. The concepts are not primarily interpreted as components of elaborate and consistent (philosophical, social, artistic) theories, but as parts of a more or less widespread and a more or less elusive literary doxa, discussed by and/or shared by different participants in the process of literary communication (writers, critics, literary historians, publishers, readers, etc.), and contributing to the idea (or, more accurate: the various and often conflicting ideas) of literature at a given moment in history.","PeriodicalId":43010,"journal":{"name":"ARCADIA","volume":"76 1","pages":"245 - 251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCADIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2015-0019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The central premise of the series of essays presented here is that a full understanding of the wide range of factors in literary change should take into account and carefully analyze the interaction between transformations of literary repertoires on the one hand and contemporary conceptual meta-languages on the other. Therefore, each essay offers a comprehensive reflection on a set of terms or concepts that played a key role in literary discourse in the first half of the 20th century. Our initial list included notions such as rhetoric, revolution, image, poesie pure, abstraction, nobility, Kulturpessimismus, middlebrow, life, the organic, group, ecriture automatique, international, technique. Some of these are new coinages, specifically conceived to describe new literary phenomena, yet most are general notions with long histories, firmly rooted in everyday language and relevant to very diverse cultural and social domains. Nevertheless, our primary aim was to map the specific meanings these terms acquired in the literary field between roughly 1900 and 1950; precisely the fact that they are so broad and deeply rooted that makes them interesting cases for the re-articulation of literary vocabularies. The focus is on how these concepts function as building blocks within broader meta-literary discourses that try to describe, interpret, and evaluate phenomena of change in the period that is usually associated with modernist literature. The concepts are not primarily interpreted as components of elaborate and consistent (philosophical, social, artistic) theories, but as parts of a more or less widespread and a more or less elusive literary doxa, discussed by and/or shared by different participants in the process of literary communication (writers, critics, literary historians, publishers, readers, etc.), and contributing to the idea (or, more accurate: the various and often conflicting ideas) of literature at a given moment in history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学词汇的变化:欧洲文学观念的迁移与转变(1900-1950)导论
本文提出的一系列文章的中心前提是,要全面理解文学变化的各种因素,就必须考虑并仔细分析文学作品的转变与当代概念元语言之间的相互作用。因此,每篇文章都提供了对20世纪上半叶在文学话语中发挥关键作用的一组术语或概念的全面反思。我们最初列出的概念包括修辞学、革命、形象、纯粹诗歌、抽象、高贵、文化悲观主义、中产阶级、生活、有机、群体、自动文学、国际、技术。其中一些是新造的词,专门用来描述新的文学现象,但大多数是具有悠久历史的一般概念,牢牢扎根于日常语言中,与非常多样化的文化和社会领域有关。然而,我们的主要目的是绘制出这些术语在大约1900年至1950年间在文学领域获得的具体含义;正是由于它们如此广泛和根深蒂固,使得它们成为文学词汇重新表述的有趣案例。重点是这些概念如何在更广泛的元文学话语中作为构建块发挥作用,这些话语试图描述、解释和评估通常与现代主义文学相关的时期的变化现象。这些概念主要不是被解释为复杂和一致的(哲学、社会、艺术)理论的组成部分,而是作为或多或少广泛存在的和或多或少难以捉摸的文学教条的一部分,由文学交流过程中的不同参与者(作家、评论家、文学史学家、出版商、读者等)讨论和/或分享,并对思想(或者更准确地说:(历史上某一特定时期文学作品的)各种各样且常常相互矛盾的思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARCADIA
ARCADIA LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: arcadia provides a forum for internationally comparative studies that deal with literatures and liberal arts from all parts of the world. Current theories associated with these literatures and liberal arts are discussed. arcadia includes the columns: essays, miscellanea, reviews, submitted works and news.
期刊最新文献
Vera Zimmermann: Grenzenlos menschlich? Tierethische Positionen bei Elias Canetti, Marlen Haushofer und Brigitte Kronauer. Bielefeld: transcript, 2021. 274 S. Reimagining the Body Without Organs Through Exchange Value in Never Let Me Go Nizami, Profane Love and the Melancholy Tradition: Uncovering Amor Heroes in the Indian Princess’ Tale in Seven Beauties The stage-within-the-screen: Peter Brook’s film adaptation of King Lear Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1