A civic rebalancing of British multiculturalism? An analysis of geography, history and citizenship education curricula

IF 3.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Review Pub Date : 2011-05-01 DOI:10.1080/00131911.2010.527924
Daniel Faas
{"title":"A civic rebalancing of British multiculturalism? An analysis of geography, history and citizenship education curricula","authors":"Daniel Faas","doi":"10.1080/00131911.2010.527924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws on history, geography and citizenship education curricula and six semi‐structured interviews with policy‐makers – three with officials from the Department for Children, Schools and Families, two from the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and one from the Office for Standards in Education. It argues that the governmental approach of a “civic rebalancing” of multiculturalism is reflected in education. The study also shows how history, geography and citizenship curricula reflect current policy discourses, emphasising community cohesion whilst sustaining the British legacy of multiculturalism and underplaying the notion of Europe. The article contributes to a larger debate on the ways in which curricula and policy‐makers balance cultural diversity and community cohesion, and considers democracy in the school as a potentially cohesive factor. It departs from standard two‐way comparisons of national versus European or national versus multicultural agendas in addressing how national, European and migration‐related agendas are intertwined.","PeriodicalId":47755,"journal":{"name":"Educational Review","volume":"385 1 1","pages":"143 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2010.527924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This article draws on history, geography and citizenship education curricula and six semi‐structured interviews with policy‐makers – three with officials from the Department for Children, Schools and Families, two from the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and one from the Office for Standards in Education. It argues that the governmental approach of a “civic rebalancing” of multiculturalism is reflected in education. The study also shows how history, geography and citizenship curricula reflect current policy discourses, emphasising community cohesion whilst sustaining the British legacy of multiculturalism and underplaying the notion of Europe. The article contributes to a larger debate on the ways in which curricula and policy‐makers balance cultural diversity and community cohesion, and considers democracy in the school as a potentially cohesive factor. It departs from standard two‐way comparisons of national versus European or national versus multicultural agendas in addressing how national, European and migration‐related agendas are intertwined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国多元文化主义的公民再平衡?地理、历史和公民教育课程分析
本文借鉴了历史、地理和公民教育课程,并对政策制定者进行了六次半结构化访谈,其中三次访谈来自儿童、学校和家庭部的官员,两次来自资格和课程管理局,一次来自教育标准办公室。它认为,政府对多元文化主义的“公民再平衡”方法反映在教育中。该研究还表明,历史、地理和公民课程如何反映当前的政策话语,强调社区凝聚力,同时保持英国的多元文化遗产,淡化欧洲的概念。这篇文章引发了一场关于课程和政策制定者如何平衡文化多样性和社区凝聚力的更大辩论,并认为学校的民主是一个潜在的凝聚力因素。在解决国家、欧洲和移民相关议程如何交织在一起的问题上,它偏离了国家与欧洲或国家与多元文化议程的标准双向比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Review
Educational Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Educational Review is a leading journal for generic educational research and scholarship. For over seventy years it has offered scholarly analyses of global issues in all phases of education, formal and informal. It publishes peer-reviewed papers from international contributors across a range of education fields and or perspectives including pedagogy and the curriculum, history, philosophy, psychology, sociology, international and comparative education and educational leadership. Articles offer original insights to formal and informal educational policy, provision, processes and practice and the experiences of all those involved in many countries around the world. The editors welcome high quality, original papers which encourage and enhance debate on social justice and critical enquiry in education, besides innovative new theoretical and methodological scholarship. The journal offers six editions a year. The Board invites proposals for special editions as well as commissioning them.
期刊最新文献
A structured review of the potential role of school leaders in making teaching more attractive Culture, power, and ideology: the purpose and value of physical education (PE) in alternative provision schools in England Uncovering home education in Italy: characteristics, motives, and pedagogic practices Educational performance pressure and mental ill-being: the case of Danish primary and lower secondary schools, 1975–2024 “Taking off the shackles”: the joy, freedom and gravitational pull of low-stakes curriculum innovation within a high-stakes assessment framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1