Comparision of Intubating Conditions at 60 Seconds with Different Doses of Rocuronium Using the Timing Principle

Arun Kumar, S. Suchetha
{"title":"Comparision of Intubating Conditions at 60 Seconds with Different Doses of Rocuronium Using the Timing Principle","authors":"Arun Kumar, S. Suchetha","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the intubating conditions with rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg (2*ED 95) and 0.9 mg/kg (3*ED 95) at 60 s using the timing principle. Methods: 60 patients were divided into 2 groups of 30 each. Group A received 0.9 mg/kg and group B received 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium. Intubation was done at 60 s. The Train of four monitoring was done at the adductor pollicis muscle. The TOF count at intubation and time to loss of TOF were noted and compared. Results: Intubating conditions were excellent 13 (65%) in group A compared to 9 (45%) in group B. The TOF count at intubation was not statistically significant (p=0.677) between the groups whereas time to loss of TOF (p=0.03) were significant between the groups. Conclusion: Clinically acceptable intubating conditions were found in both groups but the conditions were better with group A in comparision with group B.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the intubating conditions with rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg (2*ED 95) and 0.9 mg/kg (3*ED 95) at 60 s using the timing principle. Methods: 60 patients were divided into 2 groups of 30 each. Group A received 0.9 mg/kg and group B received 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium. Intubation was done at 60 s. The Train of four monitoring was done at the adductor pollicis muscle. The TOF count at intubation and time to loss of TOF were noted and compared. Results: Intubating conditions were excellent 13 (65%) in group A compared to 9 (45%) in group B. The TOF count at intubation was not statistically significant (p=0.677) between the groups whereas time to loss of TOF (p=0.03) were significant between the groups. Conclusion: Clinically acceptable intubating conditions were found in both groups but the conditions were better with group A in comparision with group B.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剂量罗库溴铵60秒插管情况的定时比较
目的:应用定时原则评价0.6 mg/kg (2*ED 95)和0.9 mg/kg (3*ED 95) 60s罗库溴铵的插管情况。方法:60例患者分为2组,每组30例。A组给予0.9 mg/kg, B组给予0.6 mg/kg罗库溴铵。60秒插管。在政策内收肌处进行四组监测。记录并比较插管时TOF计数和TOF消失的时间。结果:插管条件良好,A组13例(65%),b组9例(45%),插管时TOF计数组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.677), TOF消失时间组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.03)。结论:两组患者均有临床可接受的插管条件,但A组插管条件优于B组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Sutured on the Pulmonary Trunk and Relevant Clinical Consequences Study in a Simulated Scenario of the Influence of Training and Personality in the Resolution of Critical Situations in Anaesthesiology Residents Pulmonary Thrombosis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Theory, Evidence, and Clinical Relevance to Resource-Limited Settings Management of Cerebropontine Angle Tumors on Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Facilitating Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Retrospective Observational Study Efficacy of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block as Analgesic Modality in Clavicle Fractures: Exploring New Horizons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1