B. Turan, T. Daşlı, A. Erkol, I. Erden, Y. Basaran
{"title":"Diastolic Dyssynchrony in Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Relationship with Functional Recovery of Left Ventricle","authors":"B. Turan, T. Daşlı, A. Erkol, I. Erden, Y. Basaran","doi":"10.4250/jcu.2016.24.3.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Incidence of diastolic dyssynchrony (DD) and its impact on functional recovery of left ventricle (LV) after ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not known. Methods Consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent successful revascularization were prospectively enrolled. Echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging was performed within 48 hours of admission and at 6 months. LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), ejection fraction (EF), and left atrial volume index (LAVI) were calculated. Diastolic delay was calculated from onset of QRS complex to peak of E wave in tissue Doppler image and presented as maximal temporal difference between peak early diastolic velocity of 6 basal segments of LV (TeDiff). Study patients were compared with demographically matched control group. Results Forty eight consecutive patients (55 ± 10 years, 88% male) and 24 controls (56 ± 6 years, 88% male) were included. TeDiff was higher in STEMI than in controls (35.9 ± 19.9 ms vs. 26.3 ± 6.8 ms, p = 0.025). Presence of DD was higher in STEMI than controls (58% vs. 33%, p = 0.046) according to calculated cut-off value (≥ 29 ms). There was no correlation between TeDiff and change in EDVI, ESVI, and LAVI at 6 months, however TeDiff and change in EF at 6 months was positively correlated (r = 0.328, p = 0.023). Patients with baseline DD experienced remodeling less frequently compared to patients without baseline DD (11% vs. 38%, p = 0.040) during follow-up. Conclusion STEMI disrupts diastolic synchronicity of LV. However, DD during acute phase of STEMI is associated with better recovery of LV thereafter. This suggests that DD is associated with peri-infarct stunned myocardium that is salvaged with primary intervention as well as infarct size.","PeriodicalId":88913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound","volume":"83 1","pages":"208 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.3.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background Incidence of diastolic dyssynchrony (DD) and its impact on functional recovery of left ventricle (LV) after ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not known. Methods Consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent successful revascularization were prospectively enrolled. Echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging was performed within 48 hours of admission and at 6 months. LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), ejection fraction (EF), and left atrial volume index (LAVI) were calculated. Diastolic delay was calculated from onset of QRS complex to peak of E wave in tissue Doppler image and presented as maximal temporal difference between peak early diastolic velocity of 6 basal segments of LV (TeDiff). Study patients were compared with demographically matched control group. Results Forty eight consecutive patients (55 ± 10 years, 88% male) and 24 controls (56 ± 6 years, 88% male) were included. TeDiff was higher in STEMI than in controls (35.9 ± 19.9 ms vs. 26.3 ± 6.8 ms, p = 0.025). Presence of DD was higher in STEMI than controls (58% vs. 33%, p = 0.046) according to calculated cut-off value (≥ 29 ms). There was no correlation between TeDiff and change in EDVI, ESVI, and LAVI at 6 months, however TeDiff and change in EF at 6 months was positively correlated (r = 0.328, p = 0.023). Patients with baseline DD experienced remodeling less frequently compared to patients without baseline DD (11% vs. 38%, p = 0.040) during follow-up. Conclusion STEMI disrupts diastolic synchronicity of LV. However, DD during acute phase of STEMI is associated with better recovery of LV thereafter. This suggests that DD is associated with peri-infarct stunned myocardium that is salvaged with primary intervention as well as infarct size.
ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后舒张不同步(DD)的发生率及其对左心室(LV)功能恢复的影响尚不清楚。方法前瞻性纳入连续成功行血管重建术的STEMI患者。入院48小时内和6个月时进行超声心动图和组织多普勒成像。计算左室舒张末期容积指数(EDVI)、收缩末期容积指数(ESVI)、射血分数(EF)、左房容积指数(LAVI)。从QRS复音开始到组织多普勒图像E波峰值计算舒张延迟,并表示为左室6个基底段早期舒张速度峰值的最大时间差(TeDiff)。研究患者与人口统计学匹配的对照组进行比较。结果纳入48例患者(55±10岁,88%男性)和24例对照组(56±6岁,88%男性)。STEMI患者的TeDiff高于对照组(35.9±19.9 ms vs. 26.3±6.8 ms, p = 0.025)。根据计算的临界值(≥29 ms), STEMI患者的DD发生率高于对照组(58% vs. 33%, p = 0.046)。TeDiff与6个月时EDVI、ESVI、LAVI的变化无相关性,而TeDiff与6个月时EF的变化呈正相关(r = 0.328, p = 0.023)。在随访期间,基线DD患者的重塑频率低于无基线DD患者(11% vs 38%, p = 0.040)。结论STEMI破坏左室舒张同步性。然而,STEMI急性期的DD与其后较好的左室恢复相关。这表明,DD与通过初级干预挽救的梗死周围休克心肌以及梗死面积有关。