The Assessment of Innovative Geotechnical Slope Repair Techniques

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering Pub Date : 2022-11-07 DOI:10.1680/jgeen.22.00143
M. Winter, I. Nettleton, R. Seddon, J. Codd
{"title":"The Assessment of Innovative Geotechnical Slope Repair Techniques","authors":"M. Winter, I. Nettleton, R. Seddon, J. Codd","doi":"10.1680/jgeen.22.00143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarises work to evaluate the effectiveness of innovative geotechnical slope repair techniques used on National Highways’ slopes. The techniques assessed were live willow poles, Electrokinetic Geosynthetics (EKG) and Fibre Reinforced Soil (FRS) used in place of conventional approaches to reduce the overall impact of various challenges including environmental constraints (habitat and visual), access and utility constraints, and to reduce the scale and/or cost of traffic management and traffic delays. Trials were undertaken over the last 20 years or so, but monitoring was generally limited to just a few years post-construction; longer term evaluation was not generally undertaken. The evaluated success, or otherwise, of the techniques led directly to recommendations for future use ranging from the development of willow pole design guidance and specification information, guidance on further EKG trials, and the cessation of use of FRS, primarily on environmental grounds but also acknowledging the construction difficulties encountered. A life cycle analysis shows significant carbon saving compared to rock fill replacement for each of the techniques. More generic lessons learnt from the trials and the practical application reported were used to produce guidance for future trials of innovative geotechnical repair techniques, including those for slopes.","PeriodicalId":54572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.22.00143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper summarises work to evaluate the effectiveness of innovative geotechnical slope repair techniques used on National Highways’ slopes. The techniques assessed were live willow poles, Electrokinetic Geosynthetics (EKG) and Fibre Reinforced Soil (FRS) used in place of conventional approaches to reduce the overall impact of various challenges including environmental constraints (habitat and visual), access and utility constraints, and to reduce the scale and/or cost of traffic management and traffic delays. Trials were undertaken over the last 20 years or so, but monitoring was generally limited to just a few years post-construction; longer term evaluation was not generally undertaken. The evaluated success, or otherwise, of the techniques led directly to recommendations for future use ranging from the development of willow pole design guidance and specification information, guidance on further EKG trials, and the cessation of use of FRS, primarily on environmental grounds but also acknowledging the construction difficulties encountered. A life cycle analysis shows significant carbon saving compared to rock fill replacement for each of the techniques. More generic lessons learnt from the trials and the practical application reported were used to produce guidance for future trials of innovative geotechnical repair techniques, including those for slopes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新土工边坡修复技术评价
本文综述了国道边坡创新土工修复技术的有效性评价工作。评估的技术是使用活柳杆、电动土工合成材料(EKG)和纤维增强土(FRS)来代替传统方法,以减少各种挑战的总体影响,包括环境限制(栖息地和视觉)、通道和公用事业限制,并减少交通管理的规模和/或成本,以及交通延误。在过去20年左右的时间里进行了试验,但监测通常仅限于建设后的几年;一般没有进行长期评价。这些技术的评估成功与否直接导致了对未来使用的建议,包括开发柳条杆设计指南和规范信息,指导进一步的心电图试验,以及停止使用FRS,主要是出于环境原因,但也承认遇到的施工困难。生命周期分析表明,与每一种技术的岩石填充替代相比,显著的碳节约。从试验和报告的实际应用中吸取的更一般的经验教训被用来为今后试验创新的土工修复技术(包括斜坡的土工修复技术)提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
68
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Geotechnical Engineering provides a forum for the publication of high quality, topical and relevant technical papers covering all aspects of geotechnical research, design, construction and performance. The journal aims to be of interest to those civil, structural or geotechnical engineering practitioners wishing to develop a greater understanding of the influence of geotechnics on the built environment.
期刊最新文献
A case history of monitoring a wide pile group Part I: geology, single pile analysis and testing, and monitoring data Torsional vibration of a tapered pile considering circumferential support of surrounding soil Applicability of construction dewatering techniques for randomly fractured rock Sensitivity investigation of drilling efficiency to operational parameters of a drifter Hyperbolic load-displacement analysis of helical and expanded piles: database approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1