Combining Generators of Adversarial Malware Examples to Increase Evasion Rate

M. Kozák, M. Jureček
{"title":"Combining Generators of Adversarial Malware Examples to Increase Evasion Rate","authors":"M. Kozák, M. Jureček","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2304.07360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antivirus developers are increasingly embracing machine learning as a key component of malware defense. While machine learning achieves cutting-edge outcomes in many fields, it also has weaknesses that are exploited by several adversarial attack techniques. Many authors have presented both white-box and black-box generators of adversarial malware examples capable of bypassing malware detectors with varying success. We propose to combine contemporary generators in order to increase their potential. Combining different generators can create more sophisticated adversarial examples that are more likely to evade anti-malware tools. We demonstrated this technique on five well-known generators and recorded promising results. The best-performing combination of AMG-random and MAB-Malware generators achieved an average evasion rate of 15.9% against top-tier antivirus products. This represents an average improvement of more than 36% and 627% over using only the AMG-random and MAB-Malware generators, respectively. The generator that benefited the most from having another generator follow its procedure was the FGSM injection attack, which improved the evasion rate on average between 91.97% and 1,304.73%, depending on the second generator used. These results demonstrate that combining different generators can significantly improve their effectiveness against leading antivirus programs.","PeriodicalId":74779,"journal":{"name":"SECRYPT ... : proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography. International Conference on Security and Cryptography","volume":"144 1","pages":"778-786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SECRYPT ... : proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography. International Conference on Security and Cryptography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.07360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Antivirus developers are increasingly embracing machine learning as a key component of malware defense. While machine learning achieves cutting-edge outcomes in many fields, it also has weaknesses that are exploited by several adversarial attack techniques. Many authors have presented both white-box and black-box generators of adversarial malware examples capable of bypassing malware detectors with varying success. We propose to combine contemporary generators in order to increase their potential. Combining different generators can create more sophisticated adversarial examples that are more likely to evade anti-malware tools. We demonstrated this technique on five well-known generators and recorded promising results. The best-performing combination of AMG-random and MAB-Malware generators achieved an average evasion rate of 15.9% against top-tier antivirus products. This represents an average improvement of more than 36% and 627% over using only the AMG-random and MAB-Malware generators, respectively. The generator that benefited the most from having another generator follow its procedure was the FGSM injection attack, which improved the evasion rate on average between 91.97% and 1,304.73%, depending on the second generator used. These results demonstrate that combining different generators can significantly improve their effectiveness against leading antivirus programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合对抗性恶意软件示例生成器以提高逃避率
反病毒开发人员越来越多地将机器学习作为恶意软件防御的关键组成部分。虽然机器学习在许多领域取得了前沿成果,但它也有一些弱点,这些弱点被几种对抗性攻击技术所利用。许多作者已经展示了对抗恶意软件示例的白盒和黑盒生成器,它们能够绕过恶意软件检测器,并取得了不同程度的成功。我们建议将现代发电机结合起来,以增加其潜力。结合不同的生成器可以创建更复杂的对抗性示例,更有可能逃避反恶意软件工具。我们在五个知名的生成器上演示了该技术,并记录了令人满意的结果。AMG-random和MAB-Malware生成器的最佳组合对顶级防病毒产品的平均逃避率为15.9%。这比只使用AMG-random和MAB-Malware生成器分别提高了36%和627%以上。从另一个生成器遵循其程序中受益最大的生成器是FGSM注入攻击,它将逃避率平均提高了91.97%至1,304.73%,具体取决于使用的第二个生成器。这些结果表明,结合不同的生成器可以显着提高其对领先的防病毒程序的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Illicit Darkweb Classification via Natural-language Processing: Classifying Illicit Content of Webpages based on Textual Information When the Few Outweigh the Many: Illicit Content Recognition with Few-Shot Learning SQLi Detection with ML: A data-source perspective Combining Generators of Adversarial Malware Examples to Increase Evasion Rate CAPoW: Context-Aware AI-Assisted Proof of Work based DDoS Defense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1