Merit Aid, Student Mobility, and the Role of College Selectivity

R. Chakrabarti, Joydeep Roy, Joydeep Roy
{"title":"Merit Aid, Student Mobility, and the Role of College Selectivity","authors":"R. Chakrabarti, Joydeep Roy, Joydeep Roy","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2335480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we investigate the role of college selectivity in mobility decisions (both in-state and out-of-state) of freshmen students following Georgia’s HOPE scholarship program. How did HOPE affect the selectivity of colleges attended by Georgia’s freshmen students? Did it induce Georgia’s freshmen students who would have otherwise attended more selective out-of-state colleges to instead attend less selective in-state ones? Or was there movement to more selective ones, both in-state and out-of-state? Using student residency and enrollment data from IPEDS and selectivity data from Barron’s and Peterson’s, we find that in the aftermath of HOPE, Georgia freshmen attended relatively more selective colleges overall. Disaggregating further, we find that Georgia freshmen attending in-state colleges attended more selective ones. Georgia freshmen attending out-of-state colleges were also more likely to attend more selective colleges, most likely due to an increase in the reservation price to go to out-of-state colleges following HOPE. Our results are robust to a variety of sensitivity checks and have important policy implications. In particular, Peltzman had observed in his classic 1973 paper that in-kind subsidies can induce individuals to invest in less quality-adjusted human capital than they might otherwise. The fact that Georgia freshmen attended relatively more selective colleges in the post-HOPE period allays, to some extent, the concern that state merit aid programs can adversely affect long-term outcomes and human capital formation.","PeriodicalId":84751,"journal":{"name":"Field staff reports","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field staff reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2335480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the role of college selectivity in mobility decisions (both in-state and out-of-state) of freshmen students following Georgia’s HOPE scholarship program. How did HOPE affect the selectivity of colleges attended by Georgia’s freshmen students? Did it induce Georgia’s freshmen students who would have otherwise attended more selective out-of-state colleges to instead attend less selective in-state ones? Or was there movement to more selective ones, both in-state and out-of-state? Using student residency and enrollment data from IPEDS and selectivity data from Barron’s and Peterson’s, we find that in the aftermath of HOPE, Georgia freshmen attended relatively more selective colleges overall. Disaggregating further, we find that Georgia freshmen attending in-state colleges attended more selective ones. Georgia freshmen attending out-of-state colleges were also more likely to attend more selective colleges, most likely due to an increase in the reservation price to go to out-of-state colleges following HOPE. Our results are robust to a variety of sensitivity checks and have important policy implications. In particular, Peltzman had observed in his classic 1973 paper that in-kind subsidies can induce individuals to invest in less quality-adjusted human capital than they might otherwise. The fact that Georgia freshmen attended relatively more selective colleges in the post-HOPE period allays, to some extent, the concern that state merit aid programs can adversely affect long-term outcomes and human capital formation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奖学金、学生流动性和大学选择性的作用
在本文中,我们研究了大学选择性在乔治亚州HOPE奖学金项目新生流动决策(州内和州外)中的作用。HOPE是如何影响佐治亚大学新生入学的选择性的?它是否诱使乔治亚州的新生们去选择更严格的州外大学,而不是选择不那么严格的州内大学?还是有更多选择性的学校,州内和州外都有?使用IPEDS的学生居住和入学数据以及Barron 's和Peterson 's的选择性数据,我们发现,在HOPE之后,乔治亚州的新生总体上进入了相对更有选择性的大学。进一步细分,我们发现乔治亚州的新生在州立大学就读时,进入的是更有选择性的大学。乔治亚州外大学的新生也更有可能进入更有选择性的大学,这很可能是由于在HOPE之后,州外大学的预留价格增加了。我们的结果对各种敏感性检查都是稳健的,并且具有重要的政策含义。特别是,佩尔兹曼在他1973年的经典论文中观察到,实物补贴可能会诱使个人投资于质量调整程度较低的人力资本。在某种程度上,乔治亚州新生在“后希望”时期进入了相对更有选择性的大学,这一事实减轻了人们对州奖学金计划可能对长期成果和人力资本形成产生不利影响的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pandemics Change Cities: Municipal Spending and Voter Extremism in Germany, 1918-1933 Time-varying inflation risk and the cross section of stock returns Supervising large, complex financial companies: What do supervisors do? Merit Aid, Student Mobility, and the Role of College Selectivity Belief updating among college students: Evidence from experimental variation in information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1