Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s Interruptions In Presidential Debates

Zuliati Rohmah, Alda Fitriani Suwandi
{"title":"Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s Interruptions In Presidential Debates","authors":"Zuliati Rohmah, Alda Fitriani Suwandi","doi":"10.30762/jeels.v8i1.224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research aims to investigate the types and functions of interruptions of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during the US presidential debates in 2016. Data collected from Donald Trump's and Hillary Clinton's speech in the debates were transcribed and analyzed to find types and functions of interruptions by both of the candidates. The results of the Conversational Analysis display that Donald Trump dominates the interruptions by applying a substantially greater number of interruptions consisting three different types of interruptions. Butting-in Interruptions were applied by both as the biggest number of interruptions. Data analysis also demonstrates that intrusive functions appear much more frequently compared to the collaborative functions of interruptions applied by the male and female presidential candidates. Discussion as to why such phenomena are noticeable in the data concludes the paper.","PeriodicalId":56238,"journal":{"name":"JEELS Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEELS Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i1.224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present research aims to investigate the types and functions of interruptions of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during the US presidential debates in 2016. Data collected from Donald Trump's and Hillary Clinton's speech in the debates were transcribed and analyzed to find types and functions of interruptions by both of the candidates. The results of the Conversational Analysis display that Donald Trump dominates the interruptions by applying a substantially greater number of interruptions consisting three different types of interruptions. Butting-in Interruptions were applied by both as the biggest number of interruptions. Data analysis also demonstrates that intrusive functions appear much more frequently compared to the collaborative functions of interruptions applied by the male and female presidential candidates. Discussion as to why such phenomena are noticeable in the data concludes the paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唐纳德·特朗普和希拉里·克林顿在总统辩论中插话
本研究旨在调查唐纳德·特朗普和希拉里·克林顿在2016年美国总统辩论中打断的类型和功能。从唐纳德·特朗普和希拉里·克林顿在辩论中的演讲中收集的数据进行转录和分析,以找出两位候选人打断的类型和功能。对话分析的结果显示,唐纳德·特朗普通过使用三种不同类型的打断来使用大量的打断。插入式干扰是两种干扰中数量最多的。数据分析还表明,与男性和女性总统候选人使用的干扰性协作功能相比,侵入性功能出现的频率要高得多。讨论了为什么这些现象在数据中是明显的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Indonesian EFL Teachers' Identity Construction in a Global Englishes Era Assessing The Feasibility of a Web-Based Interactive Writing Assessment (WISSE): An Evaluation of Media and Linguistic Aspects Listening to Students’ and Teachers’ Voices: Online Teaching Practices Leading to EFL Learners ' Demotivation Exploring Computer Science Students’ Skill In Translating Technology and Computer Terminologies The Effect of Collaborative Reasoning On Indonesian University Students’ Literacy and Argumentation Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1