Randomized controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of Pama-Dadru-Vicharchikahar Lepa topically in the management of Vicharchika (eczema)

Amol Mungale, Suryaprakash Jaiswal, Kirti B. Tikhat
{"title":"Randomized controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of Pama-Dadru-Vicharchikahar Lepa topically in the management of Vicharchika (eczema)","authors":"Amol Mungale, Suryaprakash Jaiswal, Kirti B. Tikhat","doi":"10.4103/jism.jism_16_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The worldwide prevalence of eczema ranges from 15% to 20%. The exact cause of eczema is unknown. The modern dermatology employs systemic and local administration of steroid for the management of eczema. Despite an initial response, maintenance therapies with the small dose of systemic and topical glucocorticoid usually produce hazardous ill effect. This study evaluates and compares the effect of both the systems of medicine to get safe and cost-effective treatment. Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Pama-Dadru-Vicharchikahar Lepa (PDVL) to mometasone furoate 0.1% in the treatment of Vicharchika. Materials and Methods: Patients who arrived to the OPD and IPD of the Department of Kayachikita, DMM Ayurved College, Yavatmal, possess Vicharchika’s classical signs and symptoms. In this study, 60 patients enrolled in two groups: 30 patients of group A treated with the local application of PDVL and similarly 30 patients of group B treated with the local application of mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment for 45 days with follow-up of 45 days. The data were compared: Wilcoxon signed rank test was used within each group, whereas the Mann–Whitney test was used between groups. Result: After 90 days of treatment with follow-up, it was found that in the trial group, PDVL, average % relief was 83.86%. In the control group, mometasone furoate 0.1%, average % relief was 79.69%. PDVL was found effective on % relief, safe, easy to administer, and cost-effective. Conclusion: The local application of PDVL is effective than mometasone furoate 0.1% in the management of Vicharchika to reduce Shyava Varna, whereas the local application of PDVL is not effective than mometasone furoate 0.1% topically in the management of Vicharchika to reduce Kandu, Pidika, Rukshata, Strava, Rajyo, Lohit Varna, Ruja, and Eczema Area And Severity Index score. CTRI Number: CTRI/2020/06/025982","PeriodicalId":16051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian System of Medicine","volume":"274 1","pages":"79 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian System of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jism.jism_16_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The worldwide prevalence of eczema ranges from 15% to 20%. The exact cause of eczema is unknown. The modern dermatology employs systemic and local administration of steroid for the management of eczema. Despite an initial response, maintenance therapies with the small dose of systemic and topical glucocorticoid usually produce hazardous ill effect. This study evaluates and compares the effect of both the systems of medicine to get safe and cost-effective treatment. Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Pama-Dadru-Vicharchikahar Lepa (PDVL) to mometasone furoate 0.1% in the treatment of Vicharchika. Materials and Methods: Patients who arrived to the OPD and IPD of the Department of Kayachikita, DMM Ayurved College, Yavatmal, possess Vicharchika’s classical signs and symptoms. In this study, 60 patients enrolled in two groups: 30 patients of group A treated with the local application of PDVL and similarly 30 patients of group B treated with the local application of mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment for 45 days with follow-up of 45 days. The data were compared: Wilcoxon signed rank test was used within each group, whereas the Mann–Whitney test was used between groups. Result: After 90 days of treatment with follow-up, it was found that in the trial group, PDVL, average % relief was 83.86%. In the control group, mometasone furoate 0.1%, average % relief was 79.69%. PDVL was found effective on % relief, safe, easy to administer, and cost-effective. Conclusion: The local application of PDVL is effective than mometasone furoate 0.1% in the management of Vicharchika to reduce Shyava Varna, whereas the local application of PDVL is not effective than mometasone furoate 0.1% topically in the management of Vicharchika to reduce Kandu, Pidika, Rukshata, Strava, Rajyo, Lohit Varna, Ruja, and Eczema Area And Severity Index score. CTRI Number: CTRI/2020/06/025982
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价Pama-Dadru-Vicharchikahar Lepa局部治疗湿疹疗效的随机对照临床研究
背景:世界范围内湿疹的患病率在15%到20%之间。湿疹的确切病因尚不清楚。现代皮肤病学采用全身和局部管理类固醇管理湿疹。尽管初始反应,维持治疗与小剂量全身和局部糖皮质激素通常产生危险的不良反应。本研究对两种药物系统的效果进行了评价和比较,以获得安全、经济的治疗。目的:比较pama - dadu - vicharchikahar Lepa (PDVL)与0.1%糠酸莫米松治疗Vicharchika的疗效。材料与方法:来到亚瓦塔马市DMM Ayurved College Kayachikita科的OPD和IPD的患者,都具有Vicharchika的经典体征和症状。本研究将60例患者分为两组,A组30例局部应用PDVL治疗,B组30例局部应用0.1%糠酸莫米松软膏治疗,疗程45 d,随访45 d。资料比较:组内采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验,组间采用Mann-Whitney检验。结果:治疗90 d后随访发现,试验组PDVL平均缓解%为83.86%。对照组使用糠酸莫米松0.1%,平均缓解率为79.69%。发现PDVL有效缓解%,安全,易于管理,成本效益高。结论:局部应用PDVL比0.1%糠酸莫米松更有效地减少了维查奇卡的Shyava Varna,而局部应用PDVL对维查奇卡减少Kandu、Pidika、Rukshata、Strava、Rajyo、Lohit Varna、Ruja以及湿疹面积和严重程度指数评分的效果不如0.1%糠酸莫米松。CTRI编号:CTRI/2020/06/025982
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Daivavayapashraya Treatment with special reference to Mantra chanting on memory in adolescent children: a nonpharmacological interventional study Pharmacognostical and pharmaceutical analysis of “Medhya Rasayana”: A herbal nootropic Ayurveda formulation Premature graying of hairs: Ayurveda perspective Critical review of the liquid media and methods used in the Hartala (orpiment) purifying process The status of fermented preparations in clinical practice: A charaka samhita review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1