Application of the ABET Student Outcome Scores to the Advancement of a Power Engineering Program: An Accomplished Experience

O. Ata
{"title":"Application of the ABET Student Outcome Scores to the Advancement of a Power Engineering Program: An Accomplished Experience","authors":"O. Ata","doi":"10.16920/jeet/2023/v36i3/23097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article describes the application of a systematic approach to an electric power technology engineering (EPTE) program that ensured highquality (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - ABET) preparation. It describes how the Electrical Engineering Department at Palestine Polytechnic University (PPU), in Palestine, prepared for the EPTE program by defining and reviewing objectives and outcomes through a well-designed quality improvement process, and then implementing these evaluation results to develop the program. By obtaining results from courses delivered in two consecutive semesters, which could be more widened to a cycle of two consecutive academic years, it was possible to identify all student outcomes (SOs) with performances that either improved or deteriorated against a set threshold level of 80%. The final scores showed a mixed performance. While some SOs fell shortly below the set 80% threshold to an average level of 70%, others either met or exceeded threshold expectations. A deterioration in student outcome SO1 score related to ability of students to formulate and solve complex engineering problems. The SO2 score would require the laboratory and theoretical instructors to provide more discussion lectures and homework, in regard to circuit, system or process design, implementation and verification. The SO5 score showed that students needed to function more effectively as a team, while SO6 score indicated that students needed to improve their skills in experimentation, interpretation and analysis of data. The good scores; SO3, SO4 and SO7 related to ability of students to communicate effectively, recognize professional ethics and acquire and apply new knowledge. Keywords: Academic accreditation; Program educational objectives; Student outcomes; Quality assurance; Electrical engineering.","PeriodicalId":52197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education Transformations","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education Transformations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36i3/23097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This article describes the application of a systematic approach to an electric power technology engineering (EPTE) program that ensured highquality (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - ABET) preparation. It describes how the Electrical Engineering Department at Palestine Polytechnic University (PPU), in Palestine, prepared for the EPTE program by defining and reviewing objectives and outcomes through a well-designed quality improvement process, and then implementing these evaluation results to develop the program. By obtaining results from courses delivered in two consecutive semesters, which could be more widened to a cycle of two consecutive academic years, it was possible to identify all student outcomes (SOs) with performances that either improved or deteriorated against a set threshold level of 80%. The final scores showed a mixed performance. While some SOs fell shortly below the set 80% threshold to an average level of 70%, others either met or exceeded threshold expectations. A deterioration in student outcome SO1 score related to ability of students to formulate and solve complex engineering problems. The SO2 score would require the laboratory and theoretical instructors to provide more discussion lectures and homework, in regard to circuit, system or process design, implementation and verification. The SO5 score showed that students needed to function more effectively as a team, while SO6 score indicated that students needed to improve their skills in experimentation, interpretation and analysis of data. The good scores; SO3, SO4 and SO7 related to ability of students to communicate effectively, recognize professional ethics and acquire and apply new knowledge. Keywords: Academic accreditation; Program educational objectives; Student outcomes; Quality assurance; Electrical engineering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ABET学生成绩分数在推进动力工程课程中的应用:一个成功的经验
摘要:本文描述了系统方法在电力技术工程(EPTE)项目中的应用,以确保高质量(工程技术认证委员会- ABET)的准备。它描述了巴勒斯坦理工大学(PPU)的电气工程系如何通过精心设计的质量改进过程定义和审查目标和结果,然后实施这些评估结果来开发项目,从而为EPTE项目做准备。通过获得连续两个学期的课程成绩,可以进一步扩大到连续两个学年的周期,可以确定所有学生的成绩(SOs),其表现在80%的设定阈值水平下有所改善或恶化。最后的成绩好坏参半。虽然一些SOs很快低于设定的80%阈值至70%的平均水平,但其他SOs达到或超过了阈值预期。学生成果SO1分数的下降与学生制定和解决复杂工程问题的能力有关。SO2分数将要求实验室和理论导师提供更多关于电路、系统或工艺设计、实现和验证的讨论讲座和作业。SO5分数表明学生需要更有效地进行团队合作,而SO6分数表明学生需要提高实验、解释和分析数据的技能。成绩好;SO3、SO4和SO7关系到学生有效沟通、职业道德认知、获取和应用新知识的能力。关键词:学术认证;项目教育目标;学生的结果;质量保证;电气工程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
期刊最新文献
Problem-Based Learning for Critical Reflections on Skill-based Courses Using DEAL Model Role of AICTE-IDEA Lab in Experiential Learning and Acquisition of Multidisciplinary Skills for Execution of Undergraduate Projects Fostering Higher-Order Thinking: Pedagogical Strategies in Engineering Education A Comprehensive Analysis on Effectiveness of Parameters in NIRF India Rankings 2023 for Top 100 Engineering Institutes Peer Learning and Research Culture Within Student Organizations in Engineering: Students' Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1