{"title":"The influence of the relaxation of the electron energy distribution on the statistics of electron avalanches","authors":"W. Legler","doi":"10.1088/0508-3443/18/9/308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The distribution of sizes of electron avalanches produced in a gas by an electric field at high values of E/p is influenced by the relaxation processes in the electron energy distribution after an ionization. The description of this influence requires an ionization coefficient which depends on the avalanche size n as well as on the distance from the cathode. Lack of information on this dependence prevents a rigorous calculation of the avalanche distribution. Recently Cookson and Lewis suggested a solution of the problem by the introduction of an ionization coefficient depending on n only. The present work shows that this proposal must be rejected for physical reasons. An approximate solution previously given by the author, which is based on the concept of an `individual' ionization coefficient, is compared with the Polya distribution discussed by Cookson and Lewis and other authors.","PeriodicalId":9350,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Applied Physics","volume":"74 1","pages":"1275-1280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1967-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0508-3443/18/9/308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
Abstract
The distribution of sizes of electron avalanches produced in a gas by an electric field at high values of E/p is influenced by the relaxation processes in the electron energy distribution after an ionization. The description of this influence requires an ionization coefficient which depends on the avalanche size n as well as on the distance from the cathode. Lack of information on this dependence prevents a rigorous calculation of the avalanche distribution. Recently Cookson and Lewis suggested a solution of the problem by the introduction of an ionization coefficient depending on n only. The present work shows that this proposal must be rejected for physical reasons. An approximate solution previously given by the author, which is based on the concept of an `individual' ionization coefficient, is compared with the Polya distribution discussed by Cookson and Lewis and other authors.