Rights talk in a genocide: Myanmar as a lens for the problem of rights in Buddhist political thought

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY Politics Religion & Ideology Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/21567689.2023.2216137
Cory Sukala
{"title":"Rights talk in a genocide: Myanmar as a lens for the problem of rights in Buddhist political thought","authors":"Cory Sukala","doi":"10.1080/21567689.2023.2216137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With their integration into the global political world, the historically Buddhist countries of Southeast Asia have begun to augment, sometimes to the point of replacement, their traditional political structures with Westernized political institutions. Despite these formal changes, far less development has been made as a matter of underlying political theory. Though the language of contemporary Buddhist political thought and action is colored with talk of rights, it remains unclear how firmly this new orientation is founded. The consequences of this mixture of Western democratic political forms built upon an underlying foundation of Buddhist political theory can be seen in the developing human rights crisis in Myanmar. On the subject of the Muslim Rohingya, advocates of Burmese democracy, such as Aung San Suu Kyi, have seemingly found common cause with the military junta, with the country’s newly-minted democratic institutions proving themselves to be inadequate as a means of sustaining rights protections for the religious minority group. This paper examines the standing of rights-language in Buddhist political thought and how these concepts have thus far proven insufficient as a surrogate to similar conceptions in the liberal tradition as a foundation for political protections.","PeriodicalId":44955,"journal":{"name":"Politics Religion & Ideology","volume":"15 1","pages":"153 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Religion & Ideology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2023.2216137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT With their integration into the global political world, the historically Buddhist countries of Southeast Asia have begun to augment, sometimes to the point of replacement, their traditional political structures with Westernized political institutions. Despite these formal changes, far less development has been made as a matter of underlying political theory. Though the language of contemporary Buddhist political thought and action is colored with talk of rights, it remains unclear how firmly this new orientation is founded. The consequences of this mixture of Western democratic political forms built upon an underlying foundation of Buddhist political theory can be seen in the developing human rights crisis in Myanmar. On the subject of the Muslim Rohingya, advocates of Burmese democracy, such as Aung San Suu Kyi, have seemingly found common cause with the military junta, with the country’s newly-minted democratic institutions proving themselves to be inadequate as a means of sustaining rights protections for the religious minority group. This paper examines the standing of rights-language in Buddhist political thought and how these concepts have thus far proven insufficient as a surrogate to similar conceptions in the liberal tradition as a foundation for political protections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族灭绝中的权利对话:缅甸作为佛教政治思想中权利问题的一个镜头
随着融入全球政治世界,历史上信奉佛教的东南亚国家开始用西方化的政治制度来扩充,有时甚至达到取代传统政治结构的程度。尽管有这些形式上的变化,但作为潜在政治理论的问题,发展却少得多。尽管当代佛教政治思想和行动的语言带有权利的色彩,但尚不清楚这种新方向的建立有多牢固。这种建立在佛教政治理论基础之上的西方民主政治形式的混合,其后果可以从缅甸不断发展的人权危机中看到。在穆斯林罗辛亚人的问题上,昂山素季(Aung San Suu Kyi)等缅甸民主倡导者似乎找到了与军政府的共同目标,该国新成立的民主机构证明,它们不足以维持对这个宗教少数群体的权利保护。本文考察了权利语言在佛教政治思想中的地位,以及这些概念迄今为止如何被证明不足以替代自由主义传统中的类似概念,作为政治保护的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Official and underground: the survival strategy of the Catholic Church in Communist Czechoslovakia Why Islamists go green: politics, religion and the environment Why Islamists go green: politics, religion and the environment , by Emmanuel Karagiannis, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Series: Edinburgh Studies of the Globalized Muslim World, 2023, 240pp., £ 85.00 (hardback), ISBN: 9781399506229 Far-right reflexology: a periphery-to-centre approach for the study of the far-right Juxtaposing violent extremism and critical radicalism in Europe: the role of reflexive awareness in pursuit of religious purity and cultural essence Turkey under Erdoğan: how a country turned from democracy and the West Turkey under Erdoğan: how a country turned from democracy and the West , by Dimitar Bechev, Yale, Yale University Press, 2022, 280 pp., $28 (hardcover), ISBN: 9780300247886
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1