Feasibility of a capnometry device for respiratory biofeedback in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

O. V. Grishin, V. Gultyaeva, M. Zinchenko, D. Uryumtsev, I. G. Zhilina, V. Grishin
{"title":"Feasibility of a capnometry device for respiratory biofeedback in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery","authors":"O. V. Grishin, V. Gultyaeva, M. Zinchenko, D. Uryumtsev, I. G. Zhilina, V. Grishin","doi":"10.1109/SIBIRCON.2015.7361843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Psychophysiological patient's state during hospital stay influences coronary arterial bypass graft (CABG) surgery outcomes. Biofeedback is used in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and anxiety disorders. The aim of the current study was to evaluate feasibility of respiratory biofeedback (RB) in patients undergoing CABG surgery during hospital stay. Methods: Before CABG surgery all patients (n=93, aged 40 to 77 years) were divided into three groups after performing capnography and trial course of RB. The first group (usual care or USU group, n=48) consisted of patients who refused additional psychological support and RB, the second group consisted of patients who agreed to get psychological support (PSY group, n=25), and the third group were patients who accepted RB with psychological support (RB group, n=20). The task of the RB training for the participants was to maintain end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide 10-20 % above the initial level. Results: RB was chosen by 21.5 % of the patients, psychological support was chosen by 26.9 % of the patients. Half of the patients (51.6 %) refused the offered additional programs. There were breathing frequency reduction and expiratory time increment in the RB group in contrast to other two groups at discharge. The RB group demonstrated a significantly shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (mean 9.5 [SE 1.0] days) than the USU group (13.9 [0.7]) and the PSY group (12.4 [0.8]). Conclusion: RB appears to be a feasible method of rehabilitation of the patients undergoing CABG surgery during hospital stay. Future randomized research is needed to examine effectiveness of the method.","PeriodicalId":6503,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON)","volume":"47 1","pages":"22-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBIRCON.2015.7361843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Psychophysiological patient's state during hospital stay influences coronary arterial bypass graft (CABG) surgery outcomes. Biofeedback is used in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and anxiety disorders. The aim of the current study was to evaluate feasibility of respiratory biofeedback (RB) in patients undergoing CABG surgery during hospital stay. Methods: Before CABG surgery all patients (n=93, aged 40 to 77 years) were divided into three groups after performing capnography and trial course of RB. The first group (usual care or USU group, n=48) consisted of patients who refused additional psychological support and RB, the second group consisted of patients who agreed to get psychological support (PSY group, n=25), and the third group were patients who accepted RB with psychological support (RB group, n=20). The task of the RB training for the participants was to maintain end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide 10-20 % above the initial level. Results: RB was chosen by 21.5 % of the patients, psychological support was chosen by 26.9 % of the patients. Half of the patients (51.6 %) refused the offered additional programs. There were breathing frequency reduction and expiratory time increment in the RB group in contrast to other two groups at discharge. The RB group demonstrated a significantly shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (mean 9.5 [SE 1.0] days) than the USU group (13.9 [0.7]) and the PSY group (12.4 [0.8]). Conclusion: RB appears to be a feasible method of rehabilitation of the patients undergoing CABG surgery during hospital stay. Future randomized research is needed to examine effectiveness of the method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉搭桥手术患者呼吸生物反馈测量装置的可行性
背景:患者住院期间的心理生理状态影响冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的手术效果。生物反馈被用于创伤后应激障碍和焦虑症的治疗。本研究的目的是评估呼吸生物反馈(RB)在接受CABG手术患者住院期间的可行性。方法:患者93例,年龄40 ~ 77岁,术前行血管造影及RB疗程后分为3组。第一组(常规护理组或USU组,n=48)为拒绝额外心理支持和RB的患者,第二组为同意接受心理支持的患者(PSY组,n=25),第三组为接受RB并提供心理支持的患者(RB组,n=20)。参与者的RB训练任务是保持二氧化碳的潮汐末分压比初始水平高10- 20%。结果:21.5%的患者选择RB, 26.9%的患者选择心理支持。一半的患者(51.6%)拒绝接受额外的治疗方案。与其他两组相比,RB组患者出院时呼吸频率降低,呼气时间增加。RB组术后住院时间(平均9.5 [SE 1.0]天)明显短于USU组(13.9[0.7])和PSY组(12.4[0.8])。结论:RB是冠脉搭桥患者住院期间康复的一种可行方法。需要进一步的随机研究来检验该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of organization and control of multielectrode neuro-electrostimulation device Digraph based medical treatment planning Feasibility of a capnometry device for respiratory biofeedback in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery Computer modeling of stress-strain state of the intact portion of the coronary artery with circular irregular stenosis Multiplex detection of IgG class antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii, Rubella virus, Cytomegalovirus and Herpes virus using a novel multiplex flow immunoassay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1