Evaluation of L2 Listening Comprehension: In Pursuit of New Measurement Units

IF 0.5 Q3 LINGUISTICS Psycholinguistics Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI:10.31470/2309-1797-2023-33-1-212-229
V. Shymko
{"title":"Evaluation of L2 Listening Comprehension: In Pursuit of New Measurement Units","authors":"V. Shymko","doi":"10.31470/2309-1797-2023-33-1-212-229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. Second language (L2) listening comprehension remains one of the most under researched problems in field largely due to the corresponding methodological difficulties. This study focuses on the development of such a measurement unit that considers the actual grammatical completeness and does not distort the factual semantics of the perceived text – listening comprehension unit. \nMethods and procedure of research. The concept of listening comprehension unit is developed based on a structural-ontological approach, which is a tool for systemic description of the multidisciplinary subject matter fields. To validate listening comprehension units, a study was carried out on a sample of 38 English L2 learners. Study participants were grouped according to their IELTS results, and listening comprehension unit scores were compared with idea unit ones. \nResults. The obtained empirical data were processed with One-way ANOVA test and proper results support the following conclusions. First, listening comprehension units can be used to measure and differentiate levels of L2 listening comprehension of short texts. Secondly, the study demonstrates a higher differential sensitivity of listening comprehension units compared to idea units in L2 listening comprehension levels diagnostics. \nConclusions. First, listening comprehension units can be used to measure and differentiate levels of L2 listening comprehension of short texts. Secondly, our study demonstrates a higher differential sensitivity of listening comprehension units compared to idea units in L2 listening comprehension levels diagnostics. In our opinion, another advantage of using listening comprehension units is that this tool also allows one to look differently at the semantic structure of the listening comprehension process. In turn, this might open new psycholinguistic, pedagogical and didactic perspectives in the field.","PeriodicalId":42961,"journal":{"name":"Psycholinguistics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2023-33-1-212-229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. Second language (L2) listening comprehension remains one of the most under researched problems in field largely due to the corresponding methodological difficulties. This study focuses on the development of such a measurement unit that considers the actual grammatical completeness and does not distort the factual semantics of the perceived text – listening comprehension unit. Methods and procedure of research. The concept of listening comprehension unit is developed based on a structural-ontological approach, which is a tool for systemic description of the multidisciplinary subject matter fields. To validate listening comprehension units, a study was carried out on a sample of 38 English L2 learners. Study participants were grouped according to their IELTS results, and listening comprehension unit scores were compared with idea unit ones. Results. The obtained empirical data were processed with One-way ANOVA test and proper results support the following conclusions. First, listening comprehension units can be used to measure and differentiate levels of L2 listening comprehension of short texts. Secondly, the study demonstrates a higher differential sensitivity of listening comprehension units compared to idea units in L2 listening comprehension levels diagnostics. Conclusions. First, listening comprehension units can be used to measure and differentiate levels of L2 listening comprehension of short texts. Secondly, our study demonstrates a higher differential sensitivity of listening comprehension units compared to idea units in L2 listening comprehension levels diagnostics. In our opinion, another advantage of using listening comprehension units is that this tool also allows one to look differently at the semantic structure of the listening comprehension process. In turn, this might open new psycholinguistic, pedagogical and didactic perspectives in the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二语言听力理解的评价:追求新的测量单位
目的。第二语言(L2)听力理解一直是该领域研究最多的问题之一,这主要是由于相应的方法上的困难。本研究的重点是开发这样一个测量单元,它考虑了实际的语法完整性,并且不会扭曲感知到的文本听力理解单元的事实语义。研究方法和程序。听力理解单元的概念是在结构本体论的基础上发展起来的,它是对多学科学科领域进行系统描述的工具。为了验证听力理解单元,对38名英语第二语言学习者进行了一项研究。研究参与者根据他们的雅思成绩进行分组,并将听力理解单元的分数与概念单元的分数进行比较。结果。对所得实证数据进行单因素方差分析,结果支持以下结论。首先,听力理解单元可以用来衡量和区分二语短文篇的听力理解水平。其次,在二语听力水平诊断中,听力理解单元的差异敏感性高于概念单元。结论。首先,听力理解单元可以用来衡量和区分二语短文篇的听力理解水平。其次,我们的研究表明,在二语听力水平诊断中,听力理解单元比概念单元具有更高的差异敏感性。在我们看来,使用听力理解单元的另一个好处是,这个工具还允许人们从不同的角度看待听力理解过程的语义结构。反过来,这可能会在该领域开辟新的心理语言学、教育学和教学视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psycholinguistics
Psycholinguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Source-Text Syntactic Characteristics on the Sight-Translation Strategies and Quality Метод незакінчених речень в міждисциплінарному дослідженні соціально-демографічних та лінгвокультурних особливостей засуджених за колабораційну діяльність Information and Psychological Security of the Media Space. Ukrainian Experience of Implementation of Psycholinguistic Component Into Media Education The Use of Jordanian Arabic Possessive Pronouns by Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder The Impact of Music on Verbal Memory: Evidence from Jordanian University Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1