{"title":"The Impact of the Covid Pandemic Public Policies in Chile on Consumption","authors":"Carlos Madeira","doi":"10.31389/eco.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using survey data, I simulate the counterfactual impact of the Chilean policies during the pandemic on household consumption. I (cid:133)nd that aggregate consumption would have fallen by 16.7% in the absence of public transfers and a quarantine (cid:135)exibilization policy. Consumption would still fall by 10.2% with a quarantine (cid:135)exibilization policy but without public transfers. Overall, with a quarantine (cid:135)exibilization and all the public transfers combined, household consumption was still 6.2% below its pre-pandemic period. Relative to a scenario with quarantine (cid:135)exibilization but without income transfers, I (cid:133)nd that the income, tax, monetary policy, expenses measures were the most progressive policies and increased total consumption by 2.2%, while the debt deferral and pension withdrawals increased consumption by 0.7% and 1.3%, respectively. The policies(cid:146)impact is highly heterogeneous, with 21.5% of the households increasing their individual consumption relative to its pre-pandemic level.","PeriodicalId":100390,"journal":{"name":"Economía Informa","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economía Informa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/eco.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Using survey data, I simulate the counterfactual impact of the Chilean policies during the pandemic on household consumption. I (cid:133)nd that aggregate consumption would have fallen by 16.7% in the absence of public transfers and a quarantine (cid:135)exibilization policy. Consumption would still fall by 10.2% with a quarantine (cid:135)exibilization policy but without public transfers. Overall, with a quarantine (cid:135)exibilization and all the public transfers combined, household consumption was still 6.2% below its pre-pandemic period. Relative to a scenario with quarantine (cid:135)exibilization but without income transfers, I (cid:133)nd that the income, tax, monetary policy, expenses measures were the most progressive policies and increased total consumption by 2.2%, while the debt deferral and pension withdrawals increased consumption by 0.7% and 1.3%, respectively. The policies(cid:146)impact is highly heterogeneous, with 21.5% of the households increasing their individual consumption relative to its pre-pandemic level.