Prospects for the Introduction of Automatic Registration of Intellectual Property Objects in the Customs Registry

A. Sorokin
{"title":"Prospects for the Introduction of Automatic Registration of Intellectual Property Objects in the Customs Registry","authors":"A. Sorokin","doi":"10.18572/2072-4322-2021-1-34-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. In the context of the transition to a digital economy, many processes at the level of federal executive bodies remain paper or only automated. Despite the system of interagency electronic interaction, electronic documents are often formed with the participation of officials. Thus, there is great potential to automate these processes, including through the provision of public services. Results. The main directions of development of the Federal Customs Service of Russia for the period until 2030 are considered. Directions related to customs protection of rights to intellectual property objects (IPO) are highlighted. Further materials are devoted to the absentee discussion of the prospects for the introduction of automatic provision of public services for the inclusion of IPO in the customs register of IPO. They are considered and classified for formalization (current and possible), nature and possibility of checking the information submitted when applying for the service. Three fundamentally possible models of automatic service provision are proposed. Their positive and negative aspects are shown. The potential results from the introduction of automatic registration of IPO in TROIS for all interested parties were evaluated. Methodology: the basis of the study is complex and systemic analysis, general scientific methods of cognition — analysis and synthesis, dialectical method, systematization and classification, process and system approaches, as well as a method of comparison. Discussion. The financial side of the proposed changes deserves a separate study. Any changes should be effective, which means a reasonable ratio of the effects obtained to the resources spent. Given the high level of uncertainty of the subject area, it is not possible to carry out such calculations. Also debatable is the question of which particular model of provision should be the basis of the automatic registration model: classical, currently in force, or modified and simplified, capable of providing full automation.","PeriodicalId":88929,"journal":{"name":"Marquette intellectual property law review","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marquette intellectual property law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4322-2021-1-34-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. In the context of the transition to a digital economy, many processes at the level of federal executive bodies remain paper or only automated. Despite the system of interagency electronic interaction, electronic documents are often formed with the participation of officials. Thus, there is great potential to automate these processes, including through the provision of public services. Results. The main directions of development of the Federal Customs Service of Russia for the period until 2030 are considered. Directions related to customs protection of rights to intellectual property objects (IPO) are highlighted. Further materials are devoted to the absentee discussion of the prospects for the introduction of automatic provision of public services for the inclusion of IPO in the customs register of IPO. They are considered and classified for formalization (current and possible), nature and possibility of checking the information submitted when applying for the service. Three fundamentally possible models of automatic service provision are proposed. Their positive and negative aspects are shown. The potential results from the introduction of automatic registration of IPO in TROIS for all interested parties were evaluated. Methodology: the basis of the study is complex and systemic analysis, general scientific methods of cognition — analysis and synthesis, dialectical method, systematization and classification, process and system approaches, as well as a method of comparison. Discussion. The financial side of the proposed changes deserves a separate study. Any changes should be effective, which means a reasonable ratio of the effects obtained to the resources spent. Given the high level of uncertainty of the subject area, it is not possible to carry out such calculations. Also debatable is the question of which particular model of provision should be the basis of the automatic registration model: classical, currently in force, or modified and simplified, capable of providing full automation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识产权物品海关自动登记的展望
的相关性。在向数字经济过渡的背景下,联邦行政机构层面的许多流程仍然是纸质的或仅仅是自动化的。尽管存在机构间电子交互系统,但电子文件往往是在官员参与下形成的。因此,实现这些过程自动化的潜力很大,包括通过提供公共服务。结果。审议了俄罗斯联邦海关到2030年的主要发展方向。重点介绍了与海关保护知识产权客体权利(IPO)有关的指示。进一步的材料专门用于缺席讨论引入自动提供公共服务以将IPO纳入IPO海关登记的前景。根据申请服务时提交的信息的形式化(当前的和可能的)、性质和检查的可能性对它们进行考虑和分类。提出了三种基本可行的自动服务提供模型。他们的积极和消极的方面显示。对所有利益相关方在TROIS引入IPO自动注册的潜在结果进行了评估。方法论:研究的基础是复杂而系统的分析,一般科学的认知方法——分析与综合,辩证方法,系统化与分类,过程与系统方法,以及比较方法。讨论。拟议改革的财政方面值得单独研究。任何改变都应该是有效的,这意味着所获得的效果与所花费的资源有一个合理的比例。鉴于主题领域的高度不确定性,不可能进行这样的计算。另一个值得争论的问题是,哪种特定的规定模式应作为自动登记模式的基础:是经典的、目前有效的,还是经过修改和简化的、能够提供完全自动化的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intellectual Property Institution in the Cultural-Historical and Strategic Mode Accounting of Intangible Assets and Their Reflection in Corporate Reporting in Conditions of Digital Transformation Artificial Intelligence in the Future Law Enforcement Officers Training System Roadmap for the Development of Competition in Science and Higher Education as a Tool to Eliminate Barriers to the Growth of Competitiveness of Russian Science on Global Markets Intellectual Property Issues in Video Games
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1