Estimation of children’s age based on dentition via panoramic radiography in Surabaya, Indonesia

Agung Sosiawan, An’nisaa Chusida, B. F. Prakoeswa, Arofi Kurniawan, Maria Istiqomah Marini, B. N. Rizky, Tito Krisna Gianosa, Najminoor Ramadhani Ridlo, Mumtaz Ramadhani Putra Pesat Gatra, Aspalilah Alias
{"title":"Estimation of children’s age based on dentition via panoramic radiography in Surabaya, Indonesia","authors":"Agung Sosiawan, An’nisaa Chusida, B. F. Prakoeswa, Arofi Kurniawan, Maria Istiqomah Marini, B. N. Rizky, Tito Krisna Gianosa, Najminoor Ramadhani Ridlo, Mumtaz Ramadhani Putra Pesat Gatra, Aspalilah Alias","doi":"10.20473/j.djmkg.v55.i3.p161-164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Age may be estimated using tooth eruption sequence and/or calcification stage. Because many factors may affect the time of eruption, the tooth calcification stage shows higher accuracy than the time of tooth eruption. Demirjian’s and Willems’ methods have been most commonly used for dental age estimation. Both Willems and Demirjian use the calcification stage as an indicator. Studies comparing these methods have shown varied results, as they have been performed on different populations. Purpose: This paper aims to analyse the estimation of children's age based on dentition via panoramic radiography in Surabaya, Indonesia. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using a purposive sampling method. One hundred digital panoramic radiographs of children between 6 and 15 years that match the inclusion criteria from the Airlangga University dental hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia were evaluated. One researcher analysed estimated dental age (EDA) three times in a one-week time-lapse using Demirjian’s and Willems’ methods. Statistical analysis was carried out using a Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. EDA was calculated using both Demirjian’s and Willems’ methods. Results: The mean chronological age (CA) was 10.57 ± 2.70 for males and 10.73 ± 2.84 for females. The mean difference between CA and EDA using the Demirjian and Willems methods was -0.57 ± 1.17 and 0.10 ± 0.96 for males and 0.58 ± 1.40 and 0.44 ± 0.94 for females. Conclusion: The results suggest that Willems’ method is more precise than Demirjian’s method in males and females and more suitable for children in Surabaya, Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":11034,"journal":{"name":"Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v55.i3.p161-164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Age may be estimated using tooth eruption sequence and/or calcification stage. Because many factors may affect the time of eruption, the tooth calcification stage shows higher accuracy than the time of tooth eruption. Demirjian’s and Willems’ methods have been most commonly used for dental age estimation. Both Willems and Demirjian use the calcification stage as an indicator. Studies comparing these methods have shown varied results, as they have been performed on different populations. Purpose: This paper aims to analyse the estimation of children's age based on dentition via panoramic radiography in Surabaya, Indonesia. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using a purposive sampling method. One hundred digital panoramic radiographs of children between 6 and 15 years that match the inclusion criteria from the Airlangga University dental hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia were evaluated. One researcher analysed estimated dental age (EDA) three times in a one-week time-lapse using Demirjian’s and Willems’ methods. Statistical analysis was carried out using a Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. EDA was calculated using both Demirjian’s and Willems’ methods. Results: The mean chronological age (CA) was 10.57 ± 2.70 for males and 10.73 ± 2.84 for females. The mean difference between CA and EDA using the Demirjian and Willems methods was -0.57 ± 1.17 and 0.10 ± 0.96 for males and 0.58 ± 1.40 and 0.44 ± 0.94 for females. Conclusion: The results suggest that Willems’ method is more precise than Demirjian’s method in males and females and more suitable for children in Surabaya, Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在印度尼西亚泗水,通过全景x线摄影估计儿童的牙列年龄
背景:年龄可以通过牙齿出牙顺序和/或钙化阶段来估计。由于影响牙出牙时间的因素很多,所以牙钙化阶段比牙出牙时间的准确性更高。Demirjian和Willems的方法最常用于牙齿年龄估计。Willems和Demirjian都使用钙化阶段作为指标。比较这些方法的研究显示了不同的结果,因为它们是在不同的人群中进行的。目的:分析印度尼西亚泗水地区全景x线摄影中基于牙列的儿童年龄估计。方法:采用有目的抽样方法进行横断面研究。对来自印度尼西亚泗水Airlangga大学牙科医院的100张符合纳入标准的6至15岁儿童的数字全景x光片进行了评估。一名研究人员利用Demirjian和Willems的方法,在一周的时间内分析了三次估计的牙齿年龄(EDA)。统计学分析采用配对t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验。EDA采用Demirjian和Willems的方法计算。结果:男性平均实足年龄(CA)为10.57±2.70,女性为10.73±2.84。采用Demirjian和Willems方法,男性CA和EDA的平均差值分别为-0.57±1.17和0.10±0.96,女性为0.58±1.40和0.44±0.94。结论:Willems的方法在男性和女性中比Demirjian的方法更精确,更适用于印度尼西亚泗水地区的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Musik Instrumental terhadap Kecemasan Pasien pada Tindakan Perawatan Gigi dan Mulut Peran Prostodonsia dalam Identifikasi Manusia: Aspek Terlupakan dalam Odontologi Forensik Relationship between Tooth Brushing Behavior and Dental Caries in Children at 27 Sungai Sapih Public Elementary School Kuranji, Padang City Gambaran Performed Treatment Index (PTI) pada Mahasiswa Profesi PSPDG di RSGM Universitas Sam Ratulangi Prevalensi Maloklusi pada Anak Usia 9-12 Tahun di Daerah Pesisir Kota Manado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1