Production, Physicochemical and Organoleptic Evaluation of Bread Made from Composite Wheat-Cassava Flour

IF 1.3 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Advances in Science and Technology-Research Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.107.29
E. F. Obojiofor, J. O. Okechukwu, E. Victor, RO Anikwenze
{"title":"Production, Physicochemical and Organoleptic Evaluation of Bread Made from Composite Wheat-Cassava Flour","authors":"E. F. Obojiofor, J. O. Okechukwu, E. Victor, RO Anikwenze","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.107.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cassava (Manihot esculenta crantz) varieties: TME 419 (419), TMS 98/0581(sweet), and UMUCASS 37 (yellow) were processed into flour. Comparative studies of their physicochemical and organoleptic properties were evaluated. Proximate composition was done using the standard method of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. The sensory analysis of the cassava flour varieties was evaluated by baking bread with its wheat blends using different ratios. Results obtained showed that the moisture, crude fiber, ash content, carbohydrate content and energy value of the three cassava flour varieties differ significantly (p≤0.05); while for crude protein, the values were not significantly different (p≥0.05). Also, the swelling power, boiling point, amylose, foam capacity, and emulsification capacity of each sample was significantly (p≤0.05) different with TME 419 cassava flour having the highest values in all but foam capacity. The combination levels for bread containing wheat and cassava varieties of 75% and 25%, respectively was found to be acceptable while, bread made from 100% TME 419 cassava flour was not acceptable due to its poor sensory attributes. It was found that the carbohydrate content of TMS 98/0581 was higher than the other cassava flour samples. Breads baked with 75% wheat flour and 25% cassava flour were accepted by the sensory panel in terms of appearance, taste and texture. These results showed that high quality cassava flour has potential to replace part of the wheat flour in the production of bread since there is a wide acceptance amongst the judges.","PeriodicalId":46357,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Science and Technology-Research Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"29 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Science and Technology-Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.107.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Cassava (Manihot esculenta crantz) varieties: TME 419 (419), TMS 98/0581(sweet), and UMUCASS 37 (yellow) were processed into flour. Comparative studies of their physicochemical and organoleptic properties were evaluated. Proximate composition was done using the standard method of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. The sensory analysis of the cassava flour varieties was evaluated by baking bread with its wheat blends using different ratios. Results obtained showed that the moisture, crude fiber, ash content, carbohydrate content and energy value of the three cassava flour varieties differ significantly (p≤0.05); while for crude protein, the values were not significantly different (p≥0.05). Also, the swelling power, boiling point, amylose, foam capacity, and emulsification capacity of each sample was significantly (p≤0.05) different with TME 419 cassava flour having the highest values in all but foam capacity. The combination levels for bread containing wheat and cassava varieties of 75% and 25%, respectively was found to be acceptable while, bread made from 100% TME 419 cassava flour was not acceptable due to its poor sensory attributes. It was found that the carbohydrate content of TMS 98/0581 was higher than the other cassava flour samples. Breads baked with 75% wheat flour and 25% cassava flour were accepted by the sensory panel in terms of appearance, taste and texture. These results showed that high quality cassava flour has potential to replace part of the wheat flour in the production of bread since there is a wide acceptance amongst the judges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小麦-木薯复合粉面包的生产、理化及感官评价
摘要:对木薯品种TME 419(419)、TMS 98/0581(甜)和UMUCASS 37(黄)进行面粉加工。对其理化性质和感官性质进行了比较研究。使用官方分析化学家协会的标准方法进行近似组成。以木薯粉为原料,用不同比例的小麦与木薯粉混合烘烤面包,对木薯粉的感官特性进行了评价。结果表明:3个木薯粉品种的水分、粗纤维、灰分含量、碳水化合物含量和能量值差异显著(p≤0.05);粗蛋白质含量差异不显著(p≥0.05)。各样品的膨胀力、沸点、直链淀粉、泡沫容量和乳化容量差异显著(p≤0.05),除泡沫容量外,TME 419木薯粉均最高。小麦和木薯品种面包的组合含量分别为75%和25%是可以接受的,而100% TME 419木薯粉的面包由于其较差的感官属性而不被接受。结果表明,tms98 /0581的碳水化合物含量高于其他木薯粉样品。用75%小麦粉和25%木薯粉烘烤的面包在外观、味道和质地上都被感官小组接受。这些结果表明,高质量的木薯粉有可能在面包生产中取代部分小麦粉,因为评委们普遍接受这种面粉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Science and Technology-Research Journal
Advances in Science and Technology-Research Journal ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
152
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of a Shock Freezing Concept with Additional Electromagnetic Field Exposure Literature Review of Applicable Ballistic Materials for Temporary Wooden Building Envelopes Utilization of Levoglucosan Production By-Products Development of a Performance-Based Specification Model of Combat Clothing for the Procurement Process in Estonia Manufacturing of Bioactive Biodegradable Scaffolds by Stereolithography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1