Household Air Pollutionin Rural Western Kenya: A Major Public Health Challenge

C. Munyao, G. Simiyu, K. Kiptoo, John Chelal
{"title":"Household Air Pollutionin Rural Western Kenya: A Major Public Health Challenge","authors":"C. Munyao, G. Simiyu, K. Kiptoo, John Chelal","doi":"10.9790/2402-1107018796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of biomass fuels poses great threats to public health accounting for 32% of the total attributable burden of diseases due to Indoor Air Pollution (IAP) in Africa. Heavy reliance on biomass fuels for household energy in Kenya makes the country more vulnerable with 90% of the rural population relying on biomass fuels for domestic purposes. The objective of this study was to assess effectiveness of improved biomass cookstoves in reducing kitchen PM2.5 concentration in Western Kenya region. The data was collected through continuous real-time monitoring of kitchen pollution concentration for a period of 24 hours using UCB-PATS, CO monitors, questionnaires and time activity budgets. Data analysis was undertaken by performing ANOVA to test for their variations from WHO stipulated safe standards. The study found that at 95% CI, mean 24-hr kitchen CO and PM concentrations from all the stoves were significantly higher than the stipulated WHO threshold. Three-stone fire had the highest average 24-hour kitchen PM and CO emissions using firewood at 4272.414μg/m 3 (p = 0.000) and 75.4417ppm (p = 0.000), respectively, while Chepkube stove had the least at 682.646μg/m 3 (p = 0.000) and 8.7224ppm (p = 0.000), respectively. It was concluded that, improved biomass stoves provided an overall reduction in pollutant concentration compared to three-stone fire but the local innovation Chepkube stove that has been classified as ungraded stove had the highest pollutant reduction. In addition, indoor air pollution in rural areas is a real health risk. Consequently, it was recommended that programs aiming to reduce the adverse health impacts of CO and PM2.5 should focus on measures that result in larger reductions of PM2.5 emissions especially during burning and peak periods.","PeriodicalId":14546,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology","volume":"42 1","pages":"87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-1107018796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of biomass fuels poses great threats to public health accounting for 32% of the total attributable burden of diseases due to Indoor Air Pollution (IAP) in Africa. Heavy reliance on biomass fuels for household energy in Kenya makes the country more vulnerable with 90% of the rural population relying on biomass fuels for domestic purposes. The objective of this study was to assess effectiveness of improved biomass cookstoves in reducing kitchen PM2.5 concentration in Western Kenya region. The data was collected through continuous real-time monitoring of kitchen pollution concentration for a period of 24 hours using UCB-PATS, CO monitors, questionnaires and time activity budgets. Data analysis was undertaken by performing ANOVA to test for their variations from WHO stipulated safe standards. The study found that at 95% CI, mean 24-hr kitchen CO and PM concentrations from all the stoves were significantly higher than the stipulated WHO threshold. Three-stone fire had the highest average 24-hour kitchen PM and CO emissions using firewood at 4272.414μg/m 3 (p = 0.000) and 75.4417ppm (p = 0.000), respectively, while Chepkube stove had the least at 682.646μg/m 3 (p = 0.000) and 8.7224ppm (p = 0.000), respectively. It was concluded that, improved biomass stoves provided an overall reduction in pollutant concentration compared to three-stone fire but the local innovation Chepkube stove that has been classified as ungraded stove had the highest pollutant reduction. In addition, indoor air pollution in rural areas is a real health risk. Consequently, it was recommended that programs aiming to reduce the adverse health impacts of CO and PM2.5 should focus on measures that result in larger reductions of PM2.5 emissions especially during burning and peak periods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚西部农村家庭空气污染:一项重大公共卫生挑战
生物质燃料的使用对公共卫生构成巨大威胁,占非洲室内空气污染所致疾病总可归因负担的32%。肯尼亚家庭能源对生物质燃料的严重依赖使该国更加脆弱,90%的农村人口依靠生物质燃料用于家庭目的。本研究的目的是评估改进的生物质炉灶在降低肯尼亚西部地区厨房PM2.5浓度方面的有效性。数据是通过使用UCB-PATS、CO监测仪、问卷调查和时间活动预算对厨房污染浓度进行连续24小时实时监测而收集的。通过方差分析进行数据分析,以检验其与世卫组织规定的安全标准的差异。研究发现,在95%置信区间内,所有炉灶产生的24小时厨房CO和PM平均浓度明显高于世卫组织规定的阈值。使用柴火的三石炉的厨房24小时PM和CO平均排放量最高,分别为4272.414μg/m 3 (p = 0.000)和75.4417ppm (p = 0.000),而Chepkube炉的最低,分别为682.646μg/m 3 (p = 0.000)和8.7224ppm (p = 0.000)。结论是,与三石炉相比,改进的生物质炉提供了污染物浓度的总体降低,但被归类为未分级炉的当地创新Chepkube炉的污染物减少量最高。此外,农村地区的室内空气污染是一个真正的健康风险。因此,建议旨在减少CO和PM2.5对健康不利影响的计划应侧重于能够大幅减少PM2.5排放的措施,特别是在燃烧和高峰时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Food Adulteration and Contamination-A Catastrophe Remediaton of pesticide-polluted River using Anabaena and Nostoc spp. Household Air Pollutionin Rural Western Kenya: A Major Public Health Challenge Chef’s Perception on Nutrition and Health Seasonal variations in zooplankton with reference to physicochemical conditions in temple pond at Thiruvottiyur, Chennai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1